Re: [DISCUSS] Cassandra and future Java

Personally I don’t mind dropping support for previsous java versions. On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 6:33 AM J. D. Jordan wrote: > +1 for “Option 3: both 8 + 11” it shouldn’t be too hard to maintain code > wise, and leaves people’s options open. > > -Jeremiah > > > On May

Re: [DISCUSS] Cassandra and future Java

+1 for “Option 3: both 8 + 11” it shouldn’t be too hard to maintain code wise, and leaves people’s options open. -Jeremiah > On May 25, 2018, at 6:31 AM, Robert Stupp wrote: > > I'd like to bring up the C*/Java discussion again. It's been a while since > we've discussed this.

[DISCUSS] Cassandra and future Java

I'd like to bring up the C*/Java discussion again. It's been a while since we've discussed this. To me it sounds like there's still the question about which version(s) of Java we want to support beginning with C* 4.0. I assume, that it's legit (and probably very necessary) to assume that