Re: [DISCUSS] Cassandra and future Java

2018-05-30 Thread kurt greaves
I suppose so, I guess just highlighting that we shouldn't bother dedicating much testing resources to 4.0 on 11. I will note however that if we wanted to start making changes to support 11 it'd have to be (as Robert alluded to) based off an incomplete 11 as I'm assuming we'd make no further

Re: [DISCUSS] Cassandra and future Java

2018-05-30 Thread Stefan Podkowinski
That's probably not far off what Robert suggested: "The idea here is to default to Java 8, but the code also runs on 11" "Initially, only the combination of C* 4.0 + Java 8 would be labeled as "stable" and the combination of C* 4.0 + Java 11 as "experimental"." If Robert wants to go ahead

Re: secondary index table - tombstones surviving compactions

2018-05-30 Thread Jordan West
Hi Roman, I was able to reproduce the issue you described. I filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-14479. More details there. Thanks for reporting! Jordan On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 12:06 AM, Roman Bielik < roman.bie...@openmindnetworks.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I apologise for a

Re: [DISCUSS] Cassandra and future Java

2018-05-30 Thread kurt greaves
So for anyone that missed it, Java 11 will be released in September 2018. I'd prefer we target one Java release only. This is purely because we don't have the capacity or capability to test both releases. We hardly do a good enough job as it is of testing and lumping another JVM into the mix is