Re: [VOTE] Branching Change for 4.0 Freeze

2018-07-13 Thread Sumanth Pasupuleti
+1 nb On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 6:58 PM Jaydeep Chovatia wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 2:46 PM sankalp kohli > wrote: > > > Hi, > > As discussed in the thread[1], we are proposing that we will not > branch > > on 1st September but will only allow following merges into trunk. > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Branching Change for 4.0 Freeze

2018-07-13 Thread Jaydeep Chovatia
+1 On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 2:46 PM sankalp kohli wrote: > Hi, > As discussed in the thread[1], we are proposing that we will not branch > on 1st September but will only allow following merges into trunk. > > a. Bug and Perf fixes to 4.0. > b. Critical bugs in any version of C*. > c. Testing

Re: [VOTE] Branching Change for 4.0 Freeze

2018-07-13 Thread Roopa
+ 1 Thanks, Roopa Tangirala > On Jul 13, 2018, at 1:38 PM, Nate McCall wrote: > > +1 > I appreciate Gary's points, but if it's not working and/or we have a > specific issue, we'll address it. > > > > >> On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 9:46 AM, sankalp kohli >> wrote: >> Hi, >>As discussed

Re: [VOTE] Branching Change for 4.0 Freeze

2018-07-13 Thread Nate McCall
+1 I appreciate Gary's points, but if it's not working and/or we have a specific issue, we'll address it. On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 9:46 AM, sankalp kohli wrote: > Hi, > As discussed in the thread[1], we are proposing that we will not branch > on 1st September but will only allow following

Re: [VOTE] Branching Change for 4.0 Freeze

2018-07-13 Thread Jonathan Haddad
+1, I've come around on this, I think the long and short term benefits will be worth it. On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 11:17 AM Vinay Chella wrote: > > +1 nb > > Regards, > Vinay Chella > > > On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 11:15 AM Michael Shuler > wrote: > > > +0 > > > > There are pros and cons. I do hope

Re: [VOTE] Branching Change for 4.0 Freeze

2018-07-13 Thread Vinay Chella
+1 nb Regards, Vinay Chella On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 11:15 AM Michael Shuler wrote: > +0 > > There are pros and cons. I do hope the pros work out and the cons aren't > too impactful. I thought about just abstaining, but figured a "meh, > whatever" vote was at least worth voicing. > > Michael >

Re: [VOTE] Branching Change for 4.0 Freeze

2018-07-13 Thread Michael Shuler
+0 There are pros and cons. I do hope the pros work out and the cons aren't too impactful. I thought about just abstaining, but figured a "meh, whatever" vote was at least worth voicing. Michael On 07/11/2018 04:46 PM, sankalp kohli wrote: > Hi, > As discussed in the thread[1], we are

Re: [VOTE] Branching Change for 4.0 Freeze

2018-07-13 Thread Ben Bromhead
+1 nb On Fri, Jul 13, 2018, 09:40 Jordan West wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 5:02 AM, J. D. Jordan > wrote: > > > -0 (non-binding) as well for similar reasons to Gary. > > > > > On Jul 12, 2018, at 8:23 AM, Gary Dusbabek > wrote: > > > > > > -0 > > > > > > I'm not

Re: [VOTE] Branching Change for 4.0 Freeze

2018-07-13 Thread Jordan West
+1 (non-binding) On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 5:02 AM, J. D. Jordan wrote: > -0 (non-binding) as well for similar reasons to Gary. > > > On Jul 12, 2018, at 8:23 AM, Gary Dusbabek wrote: > > > > -0 > > > > I'm not interested in sparking a discussion on this, because a) it has > > already happened

Re: [VOTE] Branching Change for 4.0 Freeze

2018-07-13 Thread J. D. Jordan
-0 (non-binding) as well for similar reasons to Gary. > On Jul 12, 2018, at 8:23 AM, Gary Dusbabek wrote: > > -0 > > I'm not interested in sparking a discussion on this, because a) it has > already happened and b) it seems I am in a minority. But thought I should > at least include the