Hi
I wanted to start working on extending the paging mechanism to support
memory based limits. My question is whether such a change requires a CEP or
discussion in Jira is enough?
Thanks,
- - -- --- - -
Jacek Lewandowski
I'd like to add a CEP for pluggable SSTable format but I don't have permission
to create one - could anybody help me with that?
Jacek
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
For additional commands,
I'd like to start a discussion about SSTable format API proposal (CEP-17)
Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-17056
CEP:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/CEP-17%3A+SSTable+format+API
Thanks,
Jacek
With the flat structure it turns into properties file - would it be
possible to support both formats - nested yaml and flat properties?
- - -- --- - -
Jacek Lewandowski
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 10:08 PM Caleb Rackliffe
wrote:
> If it's nested, "track_warning
to maintain the old format (no "if then else" approach)
- - -- --- - -----
Jacek Lewandowski
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 12:53 AM bened...@apache.org
wrote:
> > I may be wrong here, but the CEP directly calls out making this api
> public for people who wish to replace
Awesome !
- - -- --- - -
Jacek Lewandowski
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 6:02 PM Brandon Williams wrote:
> TL;DR: https://butler.cassandra.apache.org
>
> Butler is a (soon to be OSS) companion system that tracks and
> integrates Jenkins and Jira, created
I am just wondering how to represent in properties things like lists of
non-scalar values?
- - -- --- - -
Jacek Lewandowski
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 5:16 PM Joseph Lynch wrote:
> Isn't one of the primary reasons to have a YAML configuration instead
> of a prop
We still have yq, mentioned a couple of posts earlier which does even more
than grep, so i suppose it could satisfy both camps :)
- - -- --- - -
Jacek Lewandowski
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 6:13 PM Joseph Lynch wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 9:00 AM Bowen Song wr
.
- - -- --- - -
Jacek Lewandowski
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 9:01 PM David Capwell
wrote:
> If this gets descoped to test only (can break all interfaces in a minor)
> then my support concerns are no longer valid; I am cool with the CEP scoped
> only to improving testing
>
&
I'm in
- - -- --- - -
Jacek Lewandowski
On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 7:34 AM Berenguer Blasi
wrote:
> I'm in as well
>
> On 14/11/21 14:55, Joshua McKenzie wrote:
> > Sign me up.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 4:38 PM David Capwell
David,
I apologize I did not mention those things explicitly. All the places where
sstable files are accessed directly would have to be refactored.
Regarding TableMetrics - currently it includes many metrics, some of them
are unrelated to sstables at all, but there are metrics which are specific
to limit work in GA releases to bug fixes exclusively. It remains
> to be seen if this holds.
Are there any precise requirements for supported upgrade and downgrade
paths?
Thanks
- - -- --- - ---- -
Jacek Lewandowski
On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 4:07 PM bened...@apache
the code which occurs intermittently under some rare conditions
- - -- --- - -
Jacek Lewandowski
On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 7:46 AM Berenguer Blasi
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we already have a way to confirm flakiness on circle by running the test
> repeatedly N times. Like
+1
- - -- --- - -
Jacek Lewandowski
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 4:48 PM Brandon Williams wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 7:45 AM Mick Semb Wever wrote:
> >
> > Proposing the test build of in-jvm dtest API 0.0.11 for release.
> >
Hi,
In short, we are discussing UUID based sstable generation identifiers in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-17048.
The question which somehow hold us is support for downgrading. Long story
short, when we generate new sstables with uuid based ids, they are not readable
by
Though, the user is unable to test the new feature without enabling it. And
when it is enabled, the user is unable to revert it.
- - -- --- - -
Jacek Lewandowski
On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 12:54 PM Bowen Song wrote:
> Personally, I would prefer a transition per
to force users to migrate, I don’t think there’s any rush, and the
> > important thing to avoid is providing users no version buffer to escape new
> > bugs – if a major version later we force upgrade, then they have a whole
> > range of major versions to downgrade to that still support th
I'm testing startup checks and expect them to fail in a certain scenario but
the test just exists because when a startup check fails, Cassandra calls
System.exit.
It is possible to create CassandraDaemon with "runManaged" constructor arg
which prevents System.exit and make the code throw
Yes, I implemented that as mentioned above - cassandra.yaml option,
disabled by default, description explaining the reason and consequences.
- - -- --- - -
Jacek Lewandowski
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 3:58 PM David Capwell
wrote:
> > should we let users enable t
Congratulations !!!
- - -- --- - -
Jacek Lewandowski
On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 8:49 AM Mick Semb Wever wrote:
>
> Congrats Aleksandr! 拾
>
> On Wed, 16 Mar 2022 at 14:16, Benjamin Lerer wrote:
>
>> The PMC members are pleased to announce that Ale
?
- - -- --- - -
Jacek Lewandowski
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 1:52 AM Dinesh Joshi wrote:
> Benedict, I agree. We should not be rigid about applying any style.
> stylechecks are meant to bring uniformity in the codebase. I assure you
> what I am proposing is neither rigid nor curbs th
e. I do not know why they are as they are.
>
>
>
> > - define continuation indent - currently it is 0 characters
>
>
>
> An opening brace introduces any necessary indentation (from the start of
> the line, which is perfect for legibility). I am somewhat inlined to
> decla
otherwise this
effort may have little effect. For the transition, perhaps checkstyle could
run on CircleCI just for the modified files?
Thanks,
jacek
- - -- --- - -----
Jacek Lewandowski
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 1:10 PM Josh McKenzie wrote:
> we should ad
/ changed code.
thanks
- - -- --- - -
Jacek Lewandowski
On Sun, Mar 20, 2022 at 8:55 PM Mick Semb Wever wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 15 Mar 2022 at 11:46, Ruslan Fomkin
> wrote:
>
>> …
>> I support Jacek’s request to have each argument on a separate
Although I like in-jvm DTests for many scenarios, I can see that they do
not test the production code as it is. They use a separate
implementation of instance initialization and thus they test the test
server rather than the real node. Other than that, it can be problematic to
test upgrades when
Mick, is the documentation / website ok?
If so, +1
Best Regards,
- - -- --- - -
Jacek Lewandowski
czw., 7 wrz 2023 o 12:58 Brandon Williams napisał(a):
> +1
>
> Kind Regards,
> Brandon
>
> On Mon, Sep 4, 2023 at 3:26 PM Mick Semb Wever wrote:
>
Ok, +1
czw., 7 wrz 2023, 21:33 użytkownik Mick Semb Wever napisał:
>
>
> On Thu, 7 Sept 2023 at 13:53, Jacek Lewandowski <
> lewandowski.ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Mick, is the documentation / website ok?
>>
>
>
> Can you elaborate on what is ok
accordingly to
participate in the remaining work.
Thanks,
- - -- --- - -
Jacek Lewandowski
pt., 27 paź 2023 o 10:26 Benjamin Lerer napisał(a):
> I would be interested in testing Maxim's approach. We need more visibility
> on big features and their progress to impro
Which tests exactly?
- - -- --- - -
Jacek Lewandowski
On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 8:39 AM Erick Ramirez
wrote:
> Johannes, I've copied the Dev ML to hopefully get a wider audience. Cheers!
>
> On Wed, 1 Jun 2022 at 21:25, Johannes Weißl wrote:
>
>> Hello
:
InetAddress.getLocalHost()
If this is not the case, please share some small reproduction example, I'll
try to figure it out
Thanks,
- - -- --- - -
Jacek Lewandowski
On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 8:49 PM Johannes Weißl wrote:
> Hi Jacek,
>
> The unit tests are from the company I work
+1
- - -- --- - -
Jacek Lewandowski
On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 6:59 AM Berenguer Blasi
wrote:
> +1
> On 8/7/22 18:42, Jeremiah D Jordan wrote:
>
> 4.0.4 went out mid May, so +1 from me for cutting 4.0.5 soon/now.
>
> Should we get into a habit of releas
n of everywhere replication strategy,
doesn't it?
- - -- --- - -
Jacek Lewandowski
On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 9:19 AM Sam Tunnicliffe wrote:
>
>
>
> On 5 Sep 2022, at 22:02, Henrik Ingo wrote:
>
> Mostly I just wanted to ack that at least someone read th
+1
- - -- --- - -
Jacek Lewandowski
On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 11:18 AM Benjamin Lerer wrote:
> +1
>
> Le ven. 21 oct. 2022 à 10:27, Miklosovic, Stefan <
> stefan.mikloso...@netapp.com> a écrit :
>
>> +1
>>
>>
+1
- - -- --- - -
Jacek Lewandowski
On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 11:38 AM Andrés de la Peña
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, 30 Sept 2022 at 09:26, Benjamin Lerer wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Le ven. 30 sept. 2022 à 08:11, Miklosovic, Stefan <
>>
with version (X-1)* and X*
(which means that all the minor future versions X. Perhaps we could make
some commitment to change major sstable format only with new major release?
What do you think?
Thanks
- - -- --- - -
Jacek Lewandowski
like the mentioned compactor would get
wrong order.
I suggest creating a ticket and fix the upgrader code by explicitly
ordering sstables by their id. The comparator for SSTableId is available in
SSTableIdFactory.COMPARATOR.
Thanks,
- - -- --- - -
Jacek Lewandowski
On Tue
Will it work with Java17?
czw., 12 sty 2023, 12:56 użytkownik Brandon Williams
napisał:
> +1
>
> Kind Regards,
> Brandon
>
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 2:02 PM Miklosovic, Stefan
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi list,
> >
> > the test for (1) is using mockito-inline dependency for mocking static
> methods as
Hi,
The feature looks useful to me
Could you add the pull request address to the ticket and summarize the
features it is going to provide?
Thank you,
- - -- --- - -
Jacek Lewandowski
On Fri, Dec 9, 2022 at 10:13 AM Claude Warren, Jr via dev <
dev@cassandra.apache.
+1
- - -- --- - -
Jacek Lewandowski
On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 2:00 PM Branimir Lambov wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'd like to propose CEP-25 for approval.
>
> Proposal:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/CEP-25%3A+Trie-inde
+1 for the proposal !
btw. regarding tests - perhaps we will have to let Python DTests run with
either new or old format
thanks
- - -- --- - -
Jacek Lewandowski
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 3:06 PM Benedict wrote:
> Yes of course, this was absolutely just a qu
/index.html but for
unreleased
Cassandra version or a blog post, so that the syntax is known to the users
and they can quickly get into speed, hopefully
reporting any problems soon.
- - -- --- - -
Jacek Lewandowski
On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 at 17:52, Benedict wrote:
> That’s f
I've experimentally added
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-16984 to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-18306 (post 4.0 cleanup)
- - -- --- - -
Jacek Lewandowski
pt., 10 mar 2023 o 09:56 Berenguer Blasi
napisał(a):
> +1 deprecate + remo
Is there a ticket for that?
- - -- --- - -
Jacek Lewandowski
czw., 9 mar 2023 o 20:27 Mick Semb Wever napisał(a):
>
>
> On Thu, 9 Mar 2023 at 18:54, Brandon Williams wrote:
>
>> I think if we reach consensus here that decides it. I too vote to
>
people are
still on 3.11 and we should not make their life harder when they consider
upgrading directly to 5.0. Though clear rules for that would help the users
and us.
thanks,
- - -- --- - -
Jacek Lewandowski
wt., 14 mar 2023 o 15:36 C. Scott Andreas napisał(a):
>
Congrats Josh!
- - -- --- - -
Jacek Lewandowski
czw., 23 mar 2023 o 09:32 Berenguer Blasi
napisał(a):
> Congrats Josh!
> On 23/3/23 9:22, Mick Semb Wever wrote:
>
> It is time to pass the baton on, and on behalf of the Apache Cassandra
> Project Manag
I vote for removing it entirely.
thanks
- - -- --- - -
Jacek Lewandowski
czw., 9 mar 2023 o 18:07 Miklosovic, Stefan
napisał(a):
> Derek,
>
> I have couple more points ... I do not think that extracting it to a
> separate repository is "win".
Lewandowski
czw., 9 mar 2023 o 18:08 Jacek Lewandowski
napisał(a):
> I vote for removing it entirely.
>
> thanks
> - - -- --- - -----
> Jacek Lewandowski
>
>
> czw., 9 mar 2023 o 18:07 Miklosovic, Stefan
> napisał(a):
>
>> Derek,
>>
>&
Is it possible to deprecate it in the 4.1.x patch release? :)
- - -- --- - -
Jacek Lewandowski
czw., 9 mar 2023 o 18:11 Brandon Williams napisał(a):
> This is my feeling too, but I think we should accomplish this by
> deprecating it first. I don't expect an
+1
pon., 13 mar 2023, 20:36 użytkownik Miklosovic, Stefan <
stefan.mikloso...@netapp.com> napisał:
> Yes, I was waiting for CASSANDRA-18125 to be in.
>
> I can release 4.1.1 to staging tomorrow morning CET if nobody objects that.
>
> Not sure about 4.0.9. We released 4.0.8 just few weeks ago. I
A bit of organization - I've created
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-18300 epic to track tickets
related to the downgradability. Please add the tickets you are aware of.
thanks
- - -- --- - -
Jacek Lewandowski
czw., 23 lut 2023 o 17:47 Benedict napisał
I suppose it can be easy for the existing feature branches if they have a
single commit. Don't we need to adjust each commit for multi-commit feature
branches?
śr., 22 lut 2023, 19:48 użytkownik Maxim Muzafarov
napisał:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I have created an issue CASSANDRA-18277 that may help
Running upgrade tests backwards is great idea which does not require extra
work.
For stats metadata it already supports writing in previous serialization
version
We need a small fix in compression metadata and that's it.
A flag with the write format version is probably LHF.
Maybe let's try,
gonna merge it this week.
I'm also open for doing some follow-up work if something is missing or
something more is needed.
Thanks,
- - -- --- - -
Jacek Lewandowski
ranges, like one impl for ma-nz, other for oa+, etc. without having a
confusing implementation with a lot of conditional blocks. Old formats in
such case could be maintained separately from the main code and easily
switched any time.
thanks
- - -- --- - -
Jacek Lewandowski
I'll do
- - -- --- - -
Jacek Lewandowski
czw., 30 mar 2023 o 22:09 Miklosovic, Stefan
napisał(a):
> Hi list,
>
> we are looking for one more committer to take a look at this patch (1, 2).
>
> It looks like there is a lot to go through because of
While for someone who already knows Cassandra keyspace is something
natural, for newcomers it is yet another concept to understand.
If namespace is used in PostgreSQL, it sounds even better to me.
Thanks,
- - -- --- - -
Jacek Lewandowski
wt., 4 kwi 2023 o 19:07 Rahul
+1
- - -- --- - -
Jacek Lewandowski
wt., 4 kwi 2023 o 15:01 Berenguer Blasi
napisał(a):
> +1
> On 4/4/23 14:36, J. D. Jordan wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Apr 4, 2023, at 7:29 AM, Brandon Williams
> wrote:
>
>
> +1
>
> On Tue, Apr 4,
config, like simple 1, so that
creating a names boils down to a simply CREATE
KEYSPACE|SCHEMA|DATABASE|NAMESPACE ;
thanks,
- - -- --- - -
Jacek Lewandowski
czw., 6 kwi 2023 o 04:09 guo Maxwell napisał(a):
> either KEYSPACE or DATABASE or SCHEMA is better than NAMESP
of validation whether that
effort is justified.
btw. We have recently agreed to keep support for M sstables format (3.0 -
3.11).
thanks,
- - -- --- - -
Jacek Lewandowski
czw., 13 kwi 2023 o 21:59 Mick Semb Wever napisał(a):
> Yes, this would be great. Right now us
+1
- - -- --- - -
Jacek Lewandowski
wt., 7 lut 2023 o 10:12 Benjamin Lerer napisał(a):
> +1
>
> Le mar. 7 févr. 2023 à 06:21, a écrit :
>
>> +1 nb
>>
>> On Feb 6, 2023, at 9:05 PM, Ariel Weisberg wrote:
>>
>> +1
&
Congrats !!!
- - -- --- - -
Jacek Lewandowski
czw., 2 lut 2023 o 19:10 Melissa Logan napisał(a):
> Congrats, Patrick!
>
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 9:58 AM Benjamin Lerer wrote:
>
>> The PMC members are pleased to announce that Patrick Mc
Josh, that answers my question exactly; thank you.
I will not implement limiting the result set in CQL (that is, by LIMIT
clause) and stay with just paging. Whether the page size is defined in
bytes or rows can be determined by a flag - there are many unused bits for
that.
So my other question -
y 2 effort and define packages in
>> the primary codebase where changes take place and multiplex (on a smaller
>> scale) their respective packages of unit tests in the future if we see
>> problems in this area.
>>
>> Flakey tests are a giant pain in the ass and a huge d
., 12 lip 2023 o 14:52 Jacek Lewandowski
napisał(a):
> Would it be re-opening the ticket or creating a new ticket with "revert of
> fix" ?
>
>
>
> śr., 12 lip 2023 o 14:51 Ekaterina Dimitrova
> napisał(a):
>
>> jenkins_jira_integration
>> <http
Isn't novnodes a special case of vnodes with n=1 ?
We should rather select a subset of tests for which it makes sense to run
with different configurations.
The set of configurations against which we run the tests currently is still
only the subset of all possible cases.
I could ask - why don't
; just gotten sidetracked by things and also realized how little I've
>> actually modified locally since I just run most of the linting against
>> delta'ed files only to keep my changed work in compliance. Still a very
>> noisy mess when SpotBugs is run against the entire codebase
eturned to the user when the full row
> is queried without transformation. For all the other case the difference
> can be really significant. For a group by queries doing a count(*), the
> approach suggested will return a page size that is totally off with what
> was requested.
>
> Le
>>> I'm not saying what you've proposed is bad, in fact, we're not
>>> currently doing the pipeline I'm talking about, but adding an
>>> additional endpoint is something we should consider very carefully as
>>> it may create some difficulties for Maven/G
Perhaps pre-commit checks should include mostly the typical configuration
of Cassandra rather than some subset of possible combinations. Like it was
said somewhere above - test with the default number of vnodes, test with
the default compression settings, and test with the default heap/off-heap
rina
>>>
>>> On Thu, 29 Jun 2023 at 10:52, Josh McKenzie
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I really prefer separate tasks than flags. Flags are not listed in the
>>> help message like "ant -p" and are not auto-completed in t
a separate
thread on that topic soon.
thanks
- - -- --- - -
Jacek Lewandowski
pt., 26 maj 2023 o 04:08 Dinesh Joshi napisał(a):
> Leaving the naming aside (the hardest part of any software), I am
> generally positive about your idea. A protocol version bu
+and+authorization
thanks,
- - -- --- - -
Jacek Lewandowski
the resultset, or we instead want to use this
>> mechanism to limit the amount of memory used internally for the data and
>> prevent problems (assuming restricting size and rows number can be used
>> simultaneously in a way that we stop when we reach any of the specified
>> limits).
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-11745
>>
>> thanks,
>> - - -- --- - -
>> Jacek Lewandowski
>>
>
then is
> is really confusing and can be a problem for some usecases. We have users
> keeping their session open and the page information to display page of data.
>
> Le lun. 12 juin 2023 à 09:08, Jacek Lewandowski <
> lewandowski.ja...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
>> Hi,
&g
SANDRA-11745
thanks,
- - -- --- - ---- -----
Jacek Lewandowski
With or without outputting JavaDoc to HTML, there are some errors which we
should maybe fix. We want to keep the documentation, but there can be
syntax errors which may prevent IDE generating a proper preview. So, the
question is - should we validate the JavaDoc comments as a precommit task?
Can
and do not even touch Ant commands directly
Checks can take time; to optimize that, they could be enforced locally to
verify only the modified files in the same way as we currently determine
the tests to be repeated for CircleCI.
Thanks
- - -- --- - -
Jacek Lewandowski
consistently by adding a Git hook.
Do you think we can encounter some particular problems with this approach?
Maxim, this is a great idea, and I fully support it - but this does not
address the issues I've raised there.
- - -- --- - -
Jacek Lewandowski
pon., 26 cze 2023 o 14:05
That would work as well Brandon, basically what is proposed in
CASSANDRA-18618, that is "check" target, actually needs to build the
project to perform some verifications - I suppose running "ant check"
should be sufficient.
- - -- --- - ---- -----
Jacek Lewand
Yes, I've mentioned that there is a property we can set to skip checkstyle.
Currently such a goal is "artifacts" which basically validates everything.
- - -- --- - -----
Jacek Lewandowski
pon., 26 cze 2023 o 13:09 Mike Adamson napisał(a):
> While I
nd eclipse-warnings
There is an additional flag "no-check" to disable checks in the "jar"
target.
Will not introduce any Git hook.
wt., 27 cze 2023 o 18:35 Jacek Lewandowski
napisał(a):
> With git you can always opt-out by adding --no-verify flag to either push
> or commi
>
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 3:22 AM Jacek Lewandowski
> wrote:
> >
> > So given all the feedback, I'm going to do the following:
> >
> > "jar" will depend on "check" target
> > "build-project", "build-test" and "te
Additional question is whether we want to run the checks against the whole
project or just against the file changes between the feature branch and the
target release branch?
- - -- --- - -
Jacek Lewandowski
pt., 16 cze 2023 o 13:09 Aleksey Yeshchenko napisał
Later, we may enable more checks than just leaked resources to improve the
code gradually.
- - -- --- - -
Jacek Lewandowski
pt., 16 cze 2023 o 13:48 Ekaterina Dimitrova
napisał(a):
> Got so excited that I forgot to say which of the two options exactly I
>
recognize the sender and know the content is
>> safe.
>>
>>
>>
>> not running it automatically with the targets which devs usually run
>> locally.
>>
>> The checks tend to have an opt-out, such as -Dno-checkstyle=true… so its
>> really
not be the best one is valid, and we
should rather think about pre-commit
- - -- --- - -
Jacek Lewandowski
wt., 27 cze 2023 o 09:25 Miklosovic, Stefan
napisał(a):
> I am doing all git-related operations in the console / bash (IDEA
> terminal, alt+f12 in IDEA). I know ID
With git you can always opt-out by adding --no-verify flag to either push
or commit
I really prefer separate tasks than flags. Flags are not listed in the help
message like "ant -p" and are not auto-completed in the terminal. That
makes them almost undiscoverable for newcomers.
Want to have jar
śr., 14 lut 2024 o 17:30 Josh McKenzie napisał(a):
> When we have failing tests people do not spend the time to figure out if
> their logic caused a regression and merge, making things more unstable… so
> when we merge failing tests that leads to people merging even more failing
> tests...
>
>
I fully understand you. Although I have that luxury to use more containers,
I simply feel that rerunning the same code with different configurations
which do not impact that code is just a waste of resources and money.
- - -- --- - -
Jacek Lewandowski
czw., 15 lut 2024
h and minimally require precommit tests for that configuration.
>> Assignees and reviewers can determine if additional test variants are
>> required based on the patch scope.
>>
>> Nightly and prerelease tests can be run to catch any issues outside the
>> standard
Great summary Josh,
>
>- JDK-based test suites on highest supported jdk using other config
>
> Do you mean a smoke test suite by that ^ ?
- - -- --- - -----
Jacek Lewandowski
czw., 15 lut 2024 o 18:12 Josh McKenzie napisał(a):
> Would it make sens
Brandon, that should be doable with the current filters I think - that is,
select only those tests which do not support vnodes. Do you know about such
in-jvm dtests as well?
- - -- --- - -
Jacek Lewandowski
czw., 15 lut 2024 o 18:21 Brandon Williams napisał
to let the
administrators enable/disable and reconfigure authentication without a
restart so we could discuss whether such transitional mode would be needed
at all in that case.
Thanks,
- - -- --- - -
Jacek Lewandowski
wt., 13 lut 2024 o 07:04 Jeff Jirsa napisał
We should conclude this discussion by answering Branimir's original
question.* I vote for merging that and exposing issues to the CI.*
For pre-commit optimization I've opened
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-19406 epic and we should
add exact tasks there to make this valuable
Let's not start another thread and discuss that directly on the ticket.
- - -- --- - -
Jacek Lewandowski
wt., 20 lut 2024 o 11:31 Berenguer Blasi
napisał(a):
> Hi All,
>
> after the recent discussion that came up in CASSANDRA-18753's discuss
> thre
Congrats Brad!
- - -- --- - -
Jacek Lewandowski
czw., 22 lut 2024 o 01:29 Štefan Miklošovič
napisał(a):
> Congrats Brad, great work in the Python department :)
>
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 9:46 PM Josh McKenzie
> wrote:
>
>> The Apache Cas
We should not block merging configuration changes given it is a valid
configuration - which I understand as it is correct, passes all config
validations, it matches documented rules, etc. And this provided latest
config matches those requirements I assume.
The failures should block release or we
Obviously +1
Thank you Alex
pt., 22 gru 2023, 16:45 użytkownik Sumanth Pasupuleti <
sumanth.pasupuleti...@gmail.com> napisał:
> +1, thank you for your efforts in bringing Harry in-tree. Anything that
> improves the testing ecosystem for Cassandra, particularly around complex
> scenarios / edge
no such merge (I pushed this branch also
to my personal fork:
https://github.com/jacek-lewandowski/cassandra/commits/cassandra-5.0)
I am really curious about what went wrong as I want to avoid that in the
future
- - -- --- - -
Jacek Lewandowski
niedz., 17 gru 2023 o 05:00
less well justified, which it may be -
> just not immediately obvious to me.
>
> On 11 Dec 2023, at 08:33, Jacek Lewandowski
> wrote:
>
>
> Nobody referred so far to the idea of moving to JUnit 5, what are the
> opinions?
>
>
>
> niedz., 10 gru 2023 o 11:03
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
