Re: Review of Cassandra actions

2016-11-06 Thread Mark Struberg
Benedict, you ride the 'bla said blub', bääh.. since at least 5 replies. Yes the discussion was heated on both sides. But Chris didn't say anything since many posts. And his reply was sharp but really not totally personal. Can we now come back to a more technical discussion again please? Some

Re: DataStax role in Cassandra and the ASF

2016-11-05 Thread Mark Struberg
s. > > > > > > > > > >On 5 November 2016 at 13:30, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid> wrote: > >Having a bit insight how the board operates (being PMC-chair for 2 other TLPs) >I can ensure you that the board did handle this very cleanly! >>

Re: Moderation

2016-11-05 Thread Mark Struberg
Russel, I don't read that out of Chris' answer. He just tried to show how community development might look like if done a bit more openly. Do you mind going back to Chris' original reply and re-read it again? I've not interpreted it as anyone trying to make you look bad. Au contraire! txs and

Re: DataStax role in Cassandra and the ASF

2016-11-05 Thread Mark Struberg
Having a bit insight how the board operates (being PMC-chair for 2 other TLPs) I can ensure you that the board did handle this very cleanly! A few things really should FIRST get handled in private. This is the same regardless whether it's about board oversight or you as a PMC. An example is