Thanks for writing this up, very useful!
Cheers,
Leo
On 18 Mar 2015, at 08:17, Gaurav Aradhye gaurav.arad...@clogeny.com wrote:
Hello all,
Last year after improving Marvin framework, we have been continuously
spending time in improving old test cases which are written in old style or
Hey folks,
integration.smoke.test_regions.TestRegions.test_createRegion
has been failing for a while now with
CloudstackAPIException: Execute cmd: addregion failed, due to:
errorCode: 530, errorText:Problem with getting the ec attribute
see i.e.
On Jan 2, 2015, at 2:59 AM, Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie wrote:
Just out of interest...
Why do we use the embedded jetty for development purposes and then shipping
on tomcat?
I don't know _the_ answer but _an_ answer is that it used to be that embedded
jetty was much leaner than embedded
/22511/#review64033
---
On June 12, 2014, 12:31 p.m., Leo Simons wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22511
Hey hey,
Thinking as an administrator, I definitely don't want release notes (or upgrade
paths themselves, or other documentation that contains procedures that have
huge impact) that have not been tested.
If I'm running cloudstack 2.2.14, and I want to upgrade to 4.4.2, and I ask on
the users
Hey hey,
Ooh, interesting topic. I'm going to top-post because I want to focus on the
big picture!
* Apache HTTPD provides 8+ years of support for old releases.
* Tomcat provides 6+ years of support for N-2 release.
* Ant provides 12+ years of backward compatiblity, so far.
(details below)
I
Hey Edison, all,
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/05bec59c1498dbcfb8a1089c86855fd3b433ea58
breaks our internal build with
+ qemu-img convert -o compat=0.10 -f raw -c -O qcow2 raw.img \
systemvmtemplate-systemvm-persistent-config-4.5.0.124-kvm.qcow2
Unknown option
Hi Min, hi Koushik,
Cloudstack is shouting at me:
NO EVENT PUBLISH CAN BE WRAPPED WITHIN DB TRANSACTION!
(full stack trace below). I've learned this is happening on our
systemvm-persistent-config feature branch because it has commit
ffaabdc13fde0f0f7b2667a483006e2a4b805f63 but it does not
On 11/18/14 5:52 AM, Leo Simons lsim...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
Hi Min, hi Koushik,
Cloudstack is shouting at me:
NO EVENT PUBLISH CAN BE WRAPPED WITHIN DB TRANSACTION!
(full stack trace below). I've learned this is happening on our
systemvm-persistent-config feature branch
On Nov 11, 2014, at 11:16 PM, Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie wrote:
I did not I will check them out. Does it matter for tooling?
No, using (say) GPL licensed or commercially licensed build tools is fine. The
only thing we don't want is really crazy tool licenses that place some kind of
claim
Hey Mike,
In git you accomplish these kinds of things with merge strategies. There’s a
lot to choose from. What you’re describing sounds a bit like a variant on the
“theirs” strategy. You can also do a recursive merge with a “theirs” conflict
resolution choice, and there’s many other options.
Hi Raja,
Ian ran into this a few days ago. Great to see you reproduce it :). I don’t
remember the exact details, but there’s something about openswan that is broken
for some kernels on some platforms in debian 7.6.
Upgrading to debian 7.7 fixes it:
On Oct 14, 2014, at 10:44 AM, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not familiar with Apache policies in this regard, but is there any way
we could establish a set of official / supported mirrors that all answer on
the same DNS address?
I.e. so that we only have to document one url
Hey folks,
The machine building systemvms was originally set up elsewhere (@citrix?).
It had been down for a few months so a few weeks ago Hugo put a new temporary
one in place in our infrastructure.
Before that setup can become permanent (we’re happy to host this) we have to do
some work to
Hey Erik,
On Oct 13, 2014, at 12:21 PM, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Leo Simons lsim...@schubergphilis.com
wrote:
Hey folks,
The machine building systemvms was originally set up elsewhere (@citrix?).
It had been down for a few months so a few
Hey Ian,
So, I upgraded my devcloud4 to latest and rebuilt all the things. For the
advanced profile, after bringing it all up, the tiny linux template wasn’t
becoming ready, sticking to status No route to host”.
After a bunch of head-scratching and debugging, it turned out I had to run
On Oct 3, 2014, at 4:03 PM, Alex Brett alex.br...@citrix.com wrote:
On 03 October 2014 13:52, Adrian Lewis [adr...@alsiconsulting.co.uk] wrote:
The only solution I can think of is to 'apt-get update bash' on every
system VM but clearly these get fired up dynamically. Is it possible to
boot the
Hey folks,
http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html
“””
NOTICE should contain only the following text, adapted with the product's name
and copyright dates:
Apache [PRODUCT_NAME]
Copyright [-20XX] The Apache Software Foundation
This product includes software developed at
The Apache
)
Leo Simons (1):
Note downloading of source releases exists.
INSTALL.md | 11 ++-
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/INSTALL.md b/INSTALL.md
index 9924ba9..3c2a338 100644
--- a/INSTALL.md
+++ b/INSTALL.md
@@ -40,12 +40,21 @@ Start the MySQL service
* NOTICE is missing copyright statement (see other e-mail)
* CHANGES.md does not list changes from 4.4.0 to 4.4.1
(list _is_ at
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-release-notes/en/latest/fixed_issues.html
)
* INSTALL.md states to get source code from git (see other
On Sep 26, 2014, at 6:43 AM, Edison Su edison...@citrix.com wrote:
Highlights the improvements on marvin I made in these days on pytest branch:
1. Switch test framework from nose to pytest, while also maintain the
back-compatibility for existing test cases.
pytest is more flexible than
Hey hey,
On Sep 23, 2014, at 11:50 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
wrote:
Hi David,
On 23-Sep-2014, at 8:31 pm, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
Where was the merge request for this huge merge to master? (it was
Hey Ian,
On Sep 24, 2014, at 2:04 AM, Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie wrote:
I noticed the filename of the generated systemvms changed on
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-systemvm64-master/
They now include a [0-9]* before the hypervisor name representing the build
number.
That’s one of
On Sep 24, 2014, at 11:26 AM, Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie wrote:
The general concept is one of traceable and repeatable builds.
In the context of jenkins.buildacloud.org I would disagree with this. Only
two build jobs are ever kept. When a time arises when you need to figure
out what commit
On Sep 24, 2014, at 5:33 PM, Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie wrote:
Aren’t they published to S3 somewhere? It’d probably be better if users
fetch systemvms from S3……
Both not a clue what the S3 urls are though.
Based on
Hey all,
High time for an overview/update on this...
Refactoring of the systemvm build process
@see https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/16
This should be about ready to merge now. Rohit helped port to buildacloud.org
and is now testing it on KVM, and will apply the pull if those
Hi Daan,
Per Rohit’s suggestion on
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/15
can you merge
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/17
for CS 4.4?
cheers,
Leo
On Sep 1, 2014, at 4:53 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
By my possibly slightly incorrect count we now have 158 branches in our
repo. Those include master and old release branches but also a lot of
obsolete ones.
Should we clean? (+1 implied)
+1
Should an RM be
On Aug 30, 2014, at 3:15 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
You can ask/make the recommendation that the foundation disable force
pushes across all branches of all repositories at the foundation. That
may actually make a lot of sense. But I don't know that everyone will
agree. (I tend to
On Aug 22, 2014, at 6:45 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
This is, by-the-way, why active committers should want to become PMC
members, to get the binding votes aligned to who is doing the work. The
ratio PMC member / committer in this project scares me.
I am curious why it scares
Hey folks!
Open source means chaos.
Chaos is ok.
Community over code.
Consensus can and should be reached lazily.
Decisions should and will be made by the people who do the work.
Vetoes are a last resort.
Neither lack of consensus nor prevalence of vetoes can block progress.
Revolution is
On Aug 19, 2014, at 11:06 PM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 19, 2014, at 4:38 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote:
Hi Sebastien,
On 19-Aug-2014, at 10:17 pm, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:
The fact that we basically have none, pushes me to argue
Hey folks,
Glad to see all the attention on this topic. Let’s do more testing! :-)
CI that we have internally
--
At schuberg philis we have a “cloudstack integration test” (CIT) environment.
It’s grown and evolved incrementally over time along with our use of
Hey Rohit,
On Aug 6, 2014, at 9:08 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote:
The proposal thread warriors Rajani, Daan, Leo and others can comment and
advise [on git flow]?
Hah, “thread warrior, I like that :-)
Cloudstack right now has, erm, some challenges when it comes to continuous
Hey folks,
As part of
https://github.com/schubergphilis/cloudstack/tree/feature/systemvm-persistent-config
We tried using chef [1] solo as a convergence tool [2] for systemvm config
changes, and along with that serverspec [3] for testing, which is pretty
standard practice while using
On Aug 7, 2014, at 8:40 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com
wrote:
(Like most of the internet...) I strongly believe using cherry picks as the
basic
tool for (release) branch management is one of the worst choices you can
make.
But. Please. Can. We. Just. Stop. Cherry.
:cloud-marvin
Thanks,
Leo Simons
of setup.py. Currently, only
cloudstackAPI is the one which marvin relies upon while building cs through
mvn, otherwise we can remove that dependency as well, its in plan. Any
upload of marvin to external package download system will tie this
dependency on pom.xml.
Leo Simons wrote:
Yep
/#comment86794
I am unsure whether this --allow-external should be there. I needed it
yesterday, but not today, and I can't figure out what changed.
- Leo Simons
On Aug. 5, 2014, 8:43 a.m., Leo Simons wrote:
---
This is an automatically
Hey folks,
Since Daan volunteered me to do some docs, I’ve updated Rohit’s page at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Git
with additional details.
I went back through all the e-mails on the subject to find questions/concerns,
addressed the ones I think have consensus
On Jul 31, 2014, at 10:34 AM, Santhosh Edukulla santhosh.eduku...@citrix.com
wrote:
Iam not sure if it is already available, so i added a simple wiki with few
notes for new submission and review process at the link below.
/diff/
Testing
---
Commands that work now for me include:
mvn -X -Pdeveloper,marvin.sync -Dendpoint=localhost -pl :cloud-marvin
python setup.py install
python setup.py develop
mvn -P developer -pl :cloud-marvin
Thanks,
Leo Simons
://reviews.apache.org/r/24238/#review49460
---
On Aug. 4, 2014, 4:08 p.m., Leo Simons wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r
On Jul 31, 2014, at 12:55 AM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote:
I suppose it would work like this:
1. In the original model, every release branch would be deleted after merge
into develop and master branch. There is no release/4.4.1 or release/4.5
branch.
2. Say we don't follow original
On Jul 31, 2014, at 12:28 PM, Rajani Karuturi rajani.karut...@citrix.com
wrote:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Git#Git-ProposedGitflowbasedCheck-inProcess
...
is up for a vote:
+1
- Leo
On Jul 30, 2014, at 1:14 AM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote:
The issue with current development process?
1. Cherry-pick is needed for RM to choose stable fix commit after code
freeze to enforce quality.
2. Bug fix to current release branch need to be checked in both release
branch and
On Jul 29, 2014, at 5:45 AM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote:
I am trying to catch up, by reading the thread and checking what's gitflow
etc, but could someone already familiar with the topic give an overview of
the issue?
For example, we can start by asking these questions:
1. What's the
Hey Pierre-Luc,
The content of the .zip is just the .vhd, and they are the same.
$ cd ~/Downloads; mkdir foo; cd foo
$ unzip ../systemvmtemplate-4.4.0-hyperv.vhd.zip
Archive: ../systemvmtemplate-4.4.0-hyperv.vhd.zip
inflating: systemvmtemplate-4.4.0-3-hyperv.vhd
$ ls -al
On Jul 24, 2014, at 8:39 AM, Rajani Karuturi rajani.karut...@citrix.com wrote:
here is what i propose:
1. rename 'master' to 'develop’
2. branch a new 'master' from '4.4’
3. branch 'RELEASE-4.5' from the develop
4. merge 'RELEASE-4.5' to master once the release voting is done.
I like this
and then master, but I don’t see that happening
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Leo Simons lsim...@schubergphilis.com
wrote:
branch twodiff size big diff chunks
branch one
4.3 4.4 11MBhyperv,netscaler,server,engine
4.4 4.4-forward2MB
On Jul 24, 2014, at 1:19 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
Leo, are you prepared to write up a how-to cwiki page?
Sure, though it would be good to get a few provisional +1s before spending a
lot of time drawing pretty pictures :)
Also, I don’t seem to have edit permissions on
Hey folks,
With 4.4.0 tagged, is now an opportune time to go and implement this?
I would enthousiastically +1 and get crackin', but I’m not a committer so its
not that practical for me to volunteer!
I wanted to point out atlassian’s description of gitflow
(mostly for schuberg philis internal, but CC to cloudstack as fyi in case
someone is following our github)
Hey folks,
Just discussing with Daan. Now that we’re figuring out our plan for writing the
code a bit, I think we have to reflect that in source code management.
First, for reference,
the changes (it is a lot of changes)
From: Leo Simons lsim...@schubergphilis.com
Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Date: Friday, July 18, 2014 at 7:42 AM
To: int-toolkit int-tool...@schubergphilis.com, dev@cloudstack.apache.org
dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: rfc
Hey folks,
https://github.com/schubergphilis/cloudstack/commit/f125f1564e8921def00dc0235ecca51470a2a22e
https://github.com/schubergphilis/cloudstack/tree/f125f1564e8921def00dc0235ecca51470a2a22e/tools/appliance
This started out as wanting the systemvm build to take
Heya,
On 7/3/14, 4:11 PM, Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 02:59:55PM +0200, Hugo Trippaers wrote:
On to the actual point behind my comment, ASF policy is not very clear
about when we can or can¹t put anything in our code that points to
something with a
+1! I’ve been slowly trying to figure out which part of the public marvin
test infrastructure we can run against our test infrastructure (and then,
later on, add our own tests to the public set…).
Having some kind of a defined set of “these tests belong with and pass
against 4.4.0 (in the citrix
Hey Ian,
Nice work! I got this working on my home PC on the weekend [1].
The readme on github could probably do with pointers to how to set up the
host-only network which is also used for devcloud:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/DevCloud#DevCloud-Se
Then hand-clicked in the web browser, and followed the wizard to create a new
zone using the simulator hpv. (hosts must be named starting with sim for
discovery to work).
Then, re-set database, skipped the wizard and created zone/cluster/host/etc
manually.
Thanks,
Leo Simons
Hey folks,
On 6/11/14, 6:36 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
Yeah, I am concerned about 4.4 getting farther behind schedule, as well,
but I agree with David that we should not cancel it.
I know it might be a pain, but I wonder if the RM would be willing to
nag
people every
Hey folks,
I had a fun day trying to follow
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Marvin+-+Testing+wit
h+Python
I¹m on the master branch. I believe that the recent change
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/20a31b43d6c0b395c7f2c449ce2f486
install. Not tested on linux but
this is common portability error so _should_ be fine.
Thanks,
Leo Simons
62 matches
Mail list logo
