Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 9:15 PM, Star Guo st...@ceph.me wrote:
+1 , wait for it.
Best Regards,
Star Guo
===
+2 :)
On 28 May 2015 at 17:21, Andrei Mikhailovsky and...@arhont.com wrote:
+1 for this
- Original Message -
From: Logan Barfield
submitting a pull
request.
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 9:18 PM, Star Guo st...@ceph.me wrote:
Hi everyone,
Since I have test cloudstack 4.4.2 + kvm + rbd, deploy an instance is so
fast apart from the first deployment because copy template from secondary
In the New Features section I would suggest clarifying that the
Baremetal Provisioning for Advanced Networks feature is only supported
by VMware, at least according to the spec page.
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya
changing something on the VR? If so I would think adding the code to
handle that task would be relatively easy.
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 3:20 AM, Sanjeev N sanj...@apache.org wrote:
As Erik mentioned, we can add nic from VPC network to existing vms so
these in myself and committing
them. I just wanted to see what the community thought first.
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
make to the project for ease of upgrades, support, etc.
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 12:58 PM, ilya ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Logan
For sometime now, idea was kicked around of extending VR services where it
can take custom configurations
? Or is there another way to set up a
site-to-site VPN using the existing network?
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 8:23 AM, Andrei Mikhailovsky and...@arhont.com wrote:
Ilya, i have followed the instructions on ceph website and it worked
perfectly well. The only addition is to enable rbd caching in the ceph.conf
Andrei
- Original Message
Our current deployment is KVM with Ceph RBD primary storage. We have
rbd_cache enabled, and use cache=none in Qemu by default.
I've been running some tests to try to figure out why our write speeds
with FreeBSD are significantly lower than Linux. I was testing both
RBD and local SSD storage,
We're running FreeBSD with VirtIO. Disk is VirtIO in the libvirt
config, and shows up as a 'vtbd' device in /dev. I'm kind of stumped
on where the performance discrepancy could be coming from.
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Wido den Hollander w
purposes. In other words, the HA tag is not required for HA
to work.
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
Seems to me, that I'm about to issue something similar to: update
cloud.vm_instance set ha = 0 where
natively supports snapshotting, which is what this discussion
is about.
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
I should have also commented on KVM (since that was the hypervisor called
out in the initial e
that it was supported where
it needs to be.
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
For example, Punith from CloudByte sent out an e-mail yesterday that was
very similar to this thread, but he
Volume Snapshots should probably really be
called Backups. So having snapshot functionality, and a convert
snapshot to backup/template would be a good move.
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 9:16 AM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
BIG +1
My team
a different thread.
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote:
On 16-02-15 15:38, Logan Barfield wrote:
I like this idea a lot for Ceph RBD. I do think there should still be
support for copying snapshots to secondary
., being
able to stop/restart/manually start tasks) would be awesome, if it's
feasible.
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote:
On 16-02-15 13:16, Andrei Mikhailovsky wrote:
I had similar issues at least two or thee
to change if needed.
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 1:54 AM, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/30/2015 04:43 PM, Logan Barfield wrote:
Hi Wido,
I didn't see the format information for snapshots
in a reasonable time frame (end of Feb)?
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/02/2015 05:14 PM, Logan Barfield wrote:
Hi Wido,
I just ran a few tests
file to get the format information instead of
pulling it from the database, though I'm not sure if that's even
possible.
Does anyone else have any thoughts or suggestions?
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote
.
Thoughts?
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
to the use QCOW2
destFile.setFormat(PhysicalDiskFormat.QCOW2); will work fine. I can
submit a patch for that, but I wanted to make sure there wasn't some
other reason for the RAW output first.
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl
.
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:54 PM, Sanjeev Neelarapu
sanjeev.neelar...@citrix.com wrote:
Which version of CS it is? I remember the similar issue in 4.2 and I think it
got fixed in later versions.
-Sanjeev
-Original Message-
From: Logan
isn't any help here.
Is there a reason for this weirdness?
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
creating it from a snapshot or volume. Only allowing
cross-zone templates when registering them from a URL is stupid.
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 5:36 PM, ilya musayev
ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com wrote:
As you know, when template is imported as all
, other than manually editing the database and
restarting the management server.
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 4:48 PM, Logan Barfield lbarfi...@tqhosting.com wrote:
I'm setting up a test zone for a multi-site deployment, and I've thus
far been unable
.
- Site 3: Thinks all sites are up.
In the above case the least harmful thing would be to push site 3 to the
other two, but since all three sites have different data it may just hang
instead.
This is going to drive me nuts. :D
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 12:57
go down (hence our interest in HA), but having a whole
datacenter's worth of customer VMs rebooting at once would be a nightmare.
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Simon Weller swel...@ena.com wrote:
Regions are designed to be completely separate from
From: Logan Barfield lbarfi...@tqhosting.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2015 1:45 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Multi-Datacenter Deployment
We are currently running a single location CloudStack deployment:
- 1 Hardware firewall
- 1 Mangement
We are currently running a single location CloudStack deployment:
- 1 Hardware firewall
- 1 Mangement/Database Server
- 1 NFS staging store (for S3 secondary storage)
- Ceph RBD for primary storage
- 4 Hypervisors
- 1 Zone/Pod/Cluster
We are looking to expand our deployment to other datacenters,
a particular attackers IP or subnet. Right now you have
to set up a second level firewall on the VM itself for this.
Would it be feasible to add a Deny option to the firewall API?
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 11:49 PM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi
jayapalreddy.ur
During initial deployment we went with a simpler network design by letting
secondary storage traffic run over the management network. We would like
to offload secondary storage to a separate network, and are trying to
figure out the best method of doing so.
Based on the recommendations in the
Thanks for the confirmation. I probably won't get around to actually
messing with it until January, so maybe someone else will chime in for more
verification.
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
My guess
I am attempting to increase the size of our NFS staging store because we
have several customers that want to create snapshots of 1TB+ disks.
Is it possible to simply add a second staging store to a zone to increase
the capacity? Or would I need to add a larger staging store, then remove
the old
Currently in the UI and API it can be difficult to tell what exactly a
particular firewall rule is being used for. I know that it is currently
possible to add tags to firewall rules, but that seems suboptimal from an
ease-of-use standpoint.
Would it be feasible to add a comment or description
Andrei,
Ubuntu 14.04 LTS works fine as a hypervisor host with the obvious exception
of the StatsCollector. There is already a JIRA issue open for this that's
being worked on: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3383
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014
I don't think there was ever a way to manage SSH Keypairs via the UI, at
least not in the last couple of years. Can you send a screenshot?
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 6:32 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
It's probably a bug, the UI has been a bit messed
to it in
Jenkins.
Is there a more recent release for this, or has anyone been keeping up
with the IPv6 support in 4.4/4.5?
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
I'm all for making the password reset system more secure, as long as it
isn't required. I don't think the risk is substantial for isolated
networks, and being forced to reconfigure every template would be a big
hassle.
I do agree that SSH Key injection should also be available in the GUI.
It's a
) that would continue to function with the current reset
scripts.
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
wrote:
+1 what Nux said - I'm aware of many web developers NOT knowing what the
SSH keys are at all, and thus not using
,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Matthew Midgett
clouds...@trick-solutions.com.invalid wrote:
1+ from me for XenServer root disk resize for template deployments!
I'm going with Nux on the single partition scheme and I want my root disk
under 2GB as most all
I don't know what the current procedure is for this, but I'd like to
get 3a52a83faeaa72a8488b2db1253fef6d3308d708
from master in the 4.5 branch if possible.
Sounds good. I've been running this in production since July without any
issues, so it shouldn't conflict with anything that I'm aware of.
Wido, if you can respond here once it's in I'd appreciate it.
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:08 PM, David Nalley da
Much appreciated Rohit.
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
wrote:
Hi Logan,
On 01-Dec-2014, at 11:57 pm, Logan Barfield lbarfi...@tqhosting.com
wrote:
3a52a83faeaa72a8488b2db1253fef6d3308d708
Thanks
I've noticed this happen several times as well. Usually when it does I'll
notice the same volume come up no matter what instance I'm looking at, and
like you mentioned the only fix is a full page refresh.
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 4:53 AM, Andrija
Hi Daan,
There are a few that I wouldn't mind seeing cherry picked for a 4.4.2 to
4.5. I'll try to post them here by the end of the day.
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 4:30
. That being the case I'd
suggest a solution that has worked for us in the past: set the weight equal
to the memory amount (in MB).
Thoughts?
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
Hi,
Basically I'm annoyed with the CPU
with, while retaining the flexibility of a custom option.
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
I am not entirely sure if 1 vs 2 = 1 vs 1000. It might be that the one
with 1000 will get 1000 more prio to CPU compared to the one
,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
Personally, I'd propose the defaults should be values proportional or
equal to the cores number (that's how openstack does it).
Anyway, all this doesn't matter as long as no developer is listening
This is a feature we would like to see as well.
Does KVM have native support for VM/Memory snapshotting? If so what are
the barriers to getting this implemented?
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
wrote:
Anybody
Has anyone else had any luck replicating this issue?
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Logan Barfield lbarfi...@tqhosting.com
wrote:
Hi Jayapal,
Can you try destroying/redeploying the Virtual Router after the IP
reservation is set up? I didn't
Hi Jayapal,
Can you try destroying/redeploying the Virtual Router after the IP
reservation is set up? I didn't encounter the issue until I restarted the
network with 'cleanup' checked.
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 2:08 AM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi
,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
Yeah, that doesn't give all of the information though. I'll file an
enhancement to add this functionality to the listDomains call I suppose.
Until next year I guess we'll need to hack in a workaround.
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Nitin Mehta
We have a cluster that is dedicated to a specific domain, and that domain
has resource limits set.
What would be the best way to display the currently utilized resources to
the user of that domain?
It's fairly easy with an API call to get the Max for each resource, but
so far I've been unable to
Hi Saksham,
Thanks, I'll give that a shot.
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 1:25 AM, Saksham Srivastava
saksham.srivast...@citrix.com wrote:
Logan,
The reason why reservation is not enabled in create stage is the case of
External network devices.
When
shouldn't be
the norm; in other words operations teams (not development, not devops,
actual sysadmins) shoulnd't need to wait on the developers to apply fixes
or changes.
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Leo Simons lsim...@schubergphilis.com
wrote:
On Oct 3
hacking work arounds into the deployment logic?
(ex: Check network for 10.1.1.10, if it doesn't exist deploy the VM on
that IP, if it already exists deploy it wherever.)
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
Hi Marcus,
I'll give that a shot. I didn't know if those parameters specified the
network CIDR or the guest CIDR.
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
Do startip and endip createNetwork parameters not work
Specifying IPs doesn't work, and in the network details I see that
specifyipranges is set to false.
I should probably note that this is using Advanced Networking with an
Isolated Guest Network.
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Logan Barfield lbarfi
created/online, or that a VM has been deployed on
the network? If it's just a Virtual Router check, is there a way to force
the Virtual Router to be created when creating the network, instead of
having it deploy when the first VM is created?
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Mon
the templates to be patched more easily (i.e. make changes and save the
template).
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Alex Brett alex.br...@citrix.com wrote:
On 03 October 2014 13:52, Adrian Lewis [adr...@alsiconsulting.co.uk]
wrote:
The only solution I can
to
prefer implicitly dedicated resources if they exist for the account.
Does this sound like a reasonable change to make to work around the issue
in the short term, or should a different approach be tried?
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 5:24 AM, Saksham Srivastava
not considering?
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
snapshot instead of being copied from secondary storage every time.
Thoughts?
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Logan Barfield lbarfi...@tqhosting.com
wrote:
The change I mentioned appears to fix the resize error. Resizing the root
disk with deployVM
Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Logan Barfield lbarfi...@tqhosting.com
wrote:
Wido,
Excellent. As long as it passes testing we'll be golden.
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl
wrote
5GB in size.
Resizing the volume manually via virsh seems to work fine. I'll look
through it again tomorrow.
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Logan Barfield lbarfi...@tqhosting.com
wrote:
Just an FYI, RBD resizing still fails because libvirt
fails.
In CLOUDSTACK-6181 there was some discussion regarding RBD support, and it
was signed off on by Wido (who appears to be the only contributor actively
supporting Ceph in CloudStack). Was the mentioned functionality just never
implemented, or am I overlooking something?
Thank You,
Logan
).
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote:
On 07/22/2014 09:53 PM, Logan Barfield wrote:
I was testing on a recent 4.4 build today and noticed that volume resizing
for RBD volumes is not working as intended
Wido,
Excellent. As long as it passes testing we'll be golden.
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote:
On 07/22/2014 10:13 PM, Logan Barfield wrote:
Wido,
I appreciate the confirmation. Would you mind
Daan,
Could you please cherry pick this commit from master to 4.4?
Commit: 736bf540e8ef759a101d221622c64f3b3c3ed425
CLOUDSTACK-6938: Cannot create template from snapshot when using S3 storage
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
71 matches
Mail list logo
