On Nov 16, 2007 8:43 AM, Vadim Gritsenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey all,
Cocoon branch and trunk demos on zones are up and running.
http://cocoon.zones.apache.org/demos/trunk/
http://cocoon.zones.apache.org/demos/21branch/
(branch was broken because of removed svn externals; trunk
Great!
Thanks Vadim.
Regards,
Jeroen Reijn
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Hey all,
Cocoon branch and trunk demos on zones are up and running.
http://cocoon.zones.apache.org/demos/trunk/
http://cocoon.zones.apache.org/demos/21branch/
(branch was broken because of removed svn externals; trunk
Hey all,
Cocoon branch and trunk demos on zones are up and running.
http://cocoon.zones.apache.org/demos/trunk/
http://cocoon.zones.apache.org/demos/21branch/
(branch was broken because of removed svn externals; trunk was not set up)
Vadim
Peter Hunsberger wrote:
In some random exploration I discovered that the image-op to grayscale
example produced a stack trace:
http://cocoon.zones.apache.org/demos/trunk/cocoon-imageop-sample/logo2.png/grayscale
Also the rotation examples on the image-op page result in a pure black image.
Vadim Gritsenko pisze:
Hey all,
Cocoon branch and trunk demos on zones are up and running.
http://cocoon.zones.apache.org/demos/trunk/
http://cocoon.zones.apache.org/demos/21branch/
(branch was broken because of removed svn externals; trunk was not set up)
Many, many thanks Vadim
Carsten Ziegeler pisze:
I know that this has been discussed in the past, but nevertheless do we
really think that urls like
http://cocoon.apache.org/2.2/1290_1_1.html
are suited for a top web framework of the 21st century? 1290_1_1 has
absolutely no meaning. So what can be done about it?
On Nov 16, 2007 9:07 AM, Vadim Gritsenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Hunsberger wrote:
In some random exploration I discovered that the image-op to grayscale
example produced a stack trace:
http://cocoon.zones.apache.org/demos/trunk/cocoon-imageop-sample/logo2.png/grayscale
I know that this has been discussed in the past, but nevertheless do we
really think that urls like
http://cocoon.apache.org/2.2/1290_1_1.html
are suited for a top web framework of the 21st century? 1290_1_1 has
absolutely no meaning. So what can be done about it?
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
Vadim Gritsenko pisze:
Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote:
Vadim Gritsenko pisze:
So it's easy to fix as soon as we establish which version Cocoon
should use, any idea if it should
be 1.3.x or 2.0.x ?
It should be xml-apis 1.3.x. IIUC, xmlParserAPIs 2.0 is some old stuff.
Vadim, I tried to fix
Vadim Gritsenko pisze:
Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote:
Vadim Gritsenko pisze:
Thanks for explanation. I'm not sure if I'm going to have a free time
to merge XInclude and Include
transformers but could we at least deprecate CInclude?
I hope nobody is going to have any objections.
Feel free
10 matches
Mail list logo