Probably first user-question since many years ;-)

2023-12-13 Thread Christofer Dutz
Hi all, as we’re thinking of giving 2.3 another try … I’m trying to make the ideas I had a bit more concrete … As some of you might know, I’m working mainly in the Industrial IoT area … here we have loads of data in odd data-structures and in general industial IoT consists of converting one

Re: [VOTE] Retire 2.1/3.0 and keep 2.x

2023-12-13 Thread Francesco Chicchiriccò
On 13/12/23 15:00, Cédric Damioli wrote: Hi, Following and according to last weeks' discussions, it seems that the general consensus would be to retire 2.1 (too old to be maintained) and 3.0 (too alpha to be maintained), and keep 2.x around for now. If I try to summarize what have been said,

AW: [VOTE] Retire 2.1/3.0 and keep 2.x

2023-12-13 Thread Christofer Dutz
+1 (non-binding) Chris Von: Cédric Damioli Datum: Mittwoch, 13. Dezember 2023 um 15:00 An: dev@cocoon.apache.org Betreff: [VOTE] Retire 2.1/3.0 and keep 2.x Hi, Following and according to last weeks' discussions, it seems that the general consensus would be to retire 2.1 (too old to be

[VOTE] Retire 2.1/3.0 and keep 2.x

2023-12-13 Thread Cédric Damioli
Hi, Following and according to last weeks' discussions, it seems that the general consensus would be to retire 2.1 (too old to be maintained) and 3.0 (too alpha to be maintained), and keep 2.x around for now. If I try to summarize what have been said, refocusing on a single product would