Stefano, taken off list because I think that thread's got long enough already!
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:19:56 +0100, Stefano Mazzocchi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And contrary to what appears to be your belief, we replied as an effort
to tune-down your 'blue sky' approach to a more let's fix what's
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:24:48 +0800, Niclas Hedhman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you want a little bit of 'peer review', and some infrastructure both in
form of subversion as well as 'real-block capable container', you are most
welcome over at Digital Product Meta Library.
Do you have a URL for
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:31:50 -0600, Peter Hunsberger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You told a whole lot of people that you thought their baby was ugly,
what did you expect?
Yep, I can see why that would get to people. Wasn't the intention
though, I promise. I'm extremely proud of what Cocoon has
Hi Stefano,
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 17:01:41 +0100, Stefano Mazzocchi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Russell wrote:
So, let me know what you think! Am I mad? Is this a bad/good idea?
What have I missed? Is this something we should take further, or just
a distraction?
Paul,
first of all, I
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 03:04:08 +0800, Niclas Hedhman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
But I am also with you that SilkWorm is a far too big step, which never will
get enough momentum to fly around here. But it IS fun to speculate, discuss
wild ideas and so on... All kids are setting out to
Hi all, long time no see!
First of all, a bit of a pre-emptive apology. Some of you might
remember me, but a lot of you probably don't. I was involved in Cocoon
back in the early days of Cocoon 2, but I got a job working for a
company that didn't use it, and so fell out of the loop. That said,
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 19:26:44 -0500, Stefano Mazzocchi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ralph Goers wrote:
I believe what you are suggesting would require that the Cocoon build be
converted to use Maven. While I personally would welcome that, this has
been discussed before and for some reason
fixes on RC1? Or are you
coming from 2.x? In which case, yes, it's a pretty serious update ;)
Paul
--
Paul Russell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
On 7 Jun 2004, at 19:37, Jeremy Quinn wrote:
On 7 Jun 2004, at 18:18, Paul Russell wrote:
Reading Jeremy's mail, it sounds like this is part test, and part
'BasicCronJob'. Can I suggest that we split the two things apart?
Create a BasicCronJob which is configurable to call an arbitrary
pipeline
it here and now. I could try and implement a WebDAV layer
underneath it, but the trouble is, I'm really on spare time at the
moment -- my 'day job' is nothing to do with Java whatsoever these
days, unfortunately. Damn those mergers and take-overs :/
Paul
--
Paul Russell
[EMAIL PROTECTED
an arbitrary
pipeline, and optionally log the results, and a separate TestCronJob
which is there specifically for testing?
Incidentally, has anyone looked at using JUnit tests for testing things
like this?
Paul
--
Paul Russell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic
separate
modules with their own code trees etc, so this may be a prior art.
Thoughts?
Paul
--
Paul Russell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
to a meeting this morning, but I wanted to join at 12:00.
Carsten
--
Paul Russell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
13 matches
Mail list logo
