Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
In the current #{$cocoon/request/request/protocol} thread we (again)
discuss problems with the environment access in JXTG. The problems
comes from that we have copied part of the servlet api in our
environment abstraction and that it contains methods of the type
Object
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
As Vadim pointed out in an earlier discussion this is done in Java
faces:
http://java.sun.com/j2ee/javaserverfaces/1.1_01/docs/api/javax/faces/context/ExternalContext.html
So what I propose is that we extend o.a.c.environment.Request with:
Map
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
In the current #{$cocoon/request/request/protocol} thread we (again)
discuss problems with the environment access in JXTG. The problems
comes from that we have copied part of the servlet api in our
environment abstraction and that it contains
Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
In the current #{$cocoon/request/request/protocol} thread we (again)
discuss problems with the environment access in JXTG. The problems
comes from that we have copied part of the servlet api in our
environment abstraction
Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
The case of parameters however should be considered carefully, as
ServletRequest provides getParameterMap() since servlet 2.4 (or 2.3?).
Having it named getParameter() in our environment may be confusing for
people used to the servlet API.
That
Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
As Vadim pointed out in an earlier discussion this is done in Java
faces:
http://java.sun.com/j2ee/javaserverfaces/1.1_01/docs/api/javax/faces/context/ExternalContext.html
So what I propose is that we extend
In the current #{$cocoon/request/request/protocol} thread we (again)
discuss problems with the environment access in JXTG. The problems comes
from that we have copied part of the servlet api in our environment
abstraction and that it contains methods of the type Object
getAttribute(String),
Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
In the current #{$cocoon/request/request/protocol} thread we (again)
discuss problems with the environment access in JXTG. The problems comes
from that we have copied part of the servlet api in our environment
abstraction and that it contains methods of the type Object
Leszek Gawron wrote:
Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
In the current #{$cocoon/request/request/protocol} thread we (again)
discuss problems with the environment access in JXTG. The problems
comes from that we have copied part of the servlet api in our
environment abstraction and that it contains
Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
As Vadim pointed out in an earlier discussion this is done in Java
faces:
http://java.sun.com/j2ee/javaserverfaces/1.1_01/docs/api/javax/faces/context/ExternalContext.html
So what I propose is that we extend o.a.c.environment.Request with:
Map getAttributes();
Map
10 matches
Mail list logo
