AW: AW: AW: [RESULT][VOTE] Retire 2.1/3.0 and keep 2.x

2024-01-23 Thread Christofer Dutz
: AW: [RESULT][VOTE] Retire 2.1/3.0 and keep 2.x +1 Cédric Le 23/01/2024 à 17:25, Christofer Dutz a écrit : Yeah … I also think that possibly making them read-only (and additionally prefixing them with a “retired/” prefix should be enough. Chris Von: Cédric Damioli <mailto:cdami...@apache.

Re: AW: AW: [RESULT][VOTE] Retire 2.1/3.0 and keep 2.x

2024-01-23 Thread Cédric Damioli
@cocoon.apache.org *Betreff: *Re: AW: [RESULT][VOTE] Retire 2.1/3.0 and keep 2.x Why should retired branches be deleted ? Shouldn't they instead be somehow put in read-only state but kept available for anyone needing them ? My 2 cents, Cédric Le 09/01/2024 à 14:40, Christofer Dutz a écrit : So, I guess

AW: AW: [RESULT][VOTE] Retire 2.1/3.0 and keep 2.x

2024-01-23 Thread Christofer Dutz
Yeah … I also think that possibly making them read-only (and additionally prefixing them with a “retired/” prefix should be enough. Chris Von: Cédric Damioli Datum: Freitag, 12. Januar 2024 um 20:48 An: dev@cocoon.apache.org Betreff: Re: AW: [RESULT][VOTE] Retire 2.1/3.0 and keep 2.x Why