: AW: [RESULT][VOTE] Retire 2.1/3.0 and keep 2.x
+1
Cédric
Le 23/01/2024 à 17:25, Christofer Dutz a écrit :
Yeah … I also think that possibly making them read-only (and additionally
prefixing them with a “retired/” prefix should be enough.
Chris
Von: Cédric Damioli <mailto:cdami...@apache.
@cocoon.apache.org
*Betreff: *Re: AW: [RESULT][VOTE] Retire 2.1/3.0 and keep 2.x
Why should retired branches be deleted ?
Shouldn't they instead be somehow put in read-only state but kept
available for anyone needing them ?
My 2 cents,
Cédric
Le 09/01/2024 à 14:40, Christofer Dutz a écrit :
So, I guess
Yeah … I also think that possibly making them read-only (and additionally
prefixing them with a “retired/” prefix should be enough.
Chris
Von: Cédric Damioli
Datum: Freitag, 12. Januar 2024 um 20:48
An: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: [RESULT][VOTE] Retire 2.1/3.0 and keep 2.x
Why