On 27 May 2005, at 17:52, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
That's what I'm after. So you see a roadmap whereby first you work on
easy kernel installation -then- play semantics.
Correct. The other way around would make the goal even harder to
bootstrap. No advancement in an open source software
Hi
On 26 May 2005, at 14:42, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Do you see a point where they'll be
able to put together semi-complex webapps in LEGO style?
Dude, can you read?
http://cocoon.apache.org/ [very first paragraph]
Patently I cannot ;-)
[nobody is responding because that's like asking:
David Casal wrote:
That's what I'm after. So you see a roadmap whereby first you work on
easy kernel installation -then- play semantics.
Correct. The other way around would make the goal even harder to
bootstrap. No advancement in an open source software happens if you
don't capture some
Hi again,
On 25 May 2005, at 10:39, David Casal wrote:
If you read this far, I owe you a beer. Please get creative with your
answers, comic-book style.
*tumbleweed*
Any suggestions as to whether I should post these questions on a new
thread, or perhaps in cocoon-users, or just not in the
David Casal wrote:
Hi again,
On 25 May 2005, at 10:39, David Casal wrote:
If you read this far, I owe you a beer. Please get creative with your
answers, comic-book style.
*tumbleweed*
Any suggestions as to whether I should post these questions on a new
thread, or perhaps in cocoon-users,
David Casal wrote:
Do you see a point where they'll be
able to put together semi-complex webapps in LEGO style?
Dude, can you read?
http://cocoon.apache.org/ [very first paragraph]
:-)
[nobody is responding because that's like asking: do you see a future of
open source for this project? WTF
Unico Hommes wrote:
...
Exactly my thinking. In fact the reason I asked is that I was thinking
of starting a Maven2 plugin for cocoon. I've been looking at the
emerging Maven2 effort that is due to come out this summer and I think
its going to be a killer. IIUC I can just start that in the
Hello all,
I apologise in advance for interrupting the thread and introducing
possibly unnecessary noise. Please tell me to go away if you find this
inappropriate.
For those of you who don't know who I am, I was the musician at GT2003.
That doesn't entitle me to pester you like this, but I
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Unico Hommes wrote:
...
Exactly my thinking. In fact the reason I asked is that I was thinking
of starting a Maven2 plugin for cocoon. I've been looking at the
emerging Maven2 effort that is due to come out this summer and I think
its going to be a killer. IIUC I can
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Unico Hommes wrote:
...
Exactly my thinking. In fact the reason I asked is that I was thinking
of starting a Maven2 plugin for cocoon. I've been looking at the
emerging Maven2 effort that is due
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Unico Hommes wrote:
...
Exactly my thinking. In fact the reason I asked is that I was thinking
of starting a Maven2 plugin for cocoon. I've been looking at the
emerging Maven2 effort that is due to come out this summer
Unico Hommes wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
Unico Hommes wrote:
Nice to see you back Unico!
Thanks Reinhard! Lurker mode is off now, but still have some catching up
to do. One of the things I'd been meaning to find out is what is the
status of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
Unico Hommes wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
Unico Hommes wrote:
Nice to see you back Unico!
Thanks Reinhard! Lurker mode is off now, but still have some catching up
to
Unico Hommes wrote:
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
hmmm, IMO yes ;-) Some others want to use Maven. As said in some former
discussions, it will not matter which build system will build a COB as
long as it follows the (to be done) COB specification (block.xml,
directory structure). I generated Ant
14 matches
Mail list logo
