Jorg Heymans wrote:
Ross Gardler wrote:
-1 over at Forrest one of our devs is experimenting with the Ajax block.
We have a demo in our forthcoming Dispatcher (aka views). Moving Ajax
into the CForms block would prevent us from using it since we don't want
to bundle CForms for fear of
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Also, please don't forget the ajax block. It is needed by forms. ;-)
Is ajax really a block on it's own ? I mean i know it can be plugged
into cforms to make forms ajax aware, but is it useable by other blocks
as well ? I'm not really uptodate with this stuff, just
Jorg Heymans wrote:
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Also, please don't forget the ajax block. It is needed by forms. ;-)
Is ajax really a block on it's own ? I mean i know it can be plugged
into cforms to make forms ajax aware, but is it useable by other blocks
as well ? I'm not really uptodate
Ross Gardler wrote:
-1 over at Forrest one of our devs is experimenting with the Ajax block.
We have a demo in our forthcoming Dispatcher (aka views). Moving Ajax
into the CForms block would prevent us from using it since we don't want
to bundle CForms for fear of confusing the boundaries
Jorg Heymans wrote:
snip/
Also: are we carrying forward all blocks to 2.2 or is this the time
where we ditch the obscure, rarely used and blocks that don't really
deserve to be a block blocks? I'ld say we choose the 10 most often used
and well known blocks and let the users voice their
Upayavira skrev:
Jorg Heymans wrote:
snip/
Also: are we carrying forward all blocks to 2.2 or is this the time
where we ditch the obscure, rarely used and blocks that don't really
deserve to be a block blocks? I'ld say we choose the 10 most often used
and well known blocks and let the users
Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
Upayavira skrev:
I would also ask whether we should consider replacing the serializers in
core with those in the serializer block.
Better move the current core serializers to an own block. IMO we
should have a core that only contains the minimal infrastructure and
Upayavira wrote:
Jorg Heymans wrote:
snip/
Also: are we carrying forward all blocks to 2.2 or is this the time
where we ditch the obscure, rarely used and blocks that don't really
deserve to be a block blocks? I'ld say we choose the 10 most often used
and well known blocks and let the
Upayavira wrote:
I would also ask whether we should consider replacing the serializers in
core with those in the serializer block.
Why would you replace single class which works in 99% of cases with 4Mb of code?
Vadim
