Pier Fumagalli wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
Ah i see now where my extra comments in msg18202 came from:
I refererred to an additional file called copyright.txt
which must have had extra restrictions. Don't know if
that is still the same today.
The copyright.txt just states that it's (C)
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@cocoon.apache.org/msg18202.html
Darn... I wish you found that when I posted the license before
committing...
http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@cocoon.apache.org/msg34406.html
The License that Pier shows in
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
On 10 Sep 2005, at 20:17, Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Ralph Goers wrote:
Ralph Goers wrote:
I seem to remember reading on legal-discuss that the nuclear
clause is incompatible with the ASL. If true, any components
with such a license can not be disctributed with
On 11 Sep 2005, at 08:07, Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
On 10 Sep 2005, at 20:17, Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Darn... I wish you found that when I posted the license before
committing...
http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@cocoon.apache.org/msg34406.html
Yep. I am really sorry
Ralph Goers wrote:
Ralph Goers wrote:
I seem to remember reading on legal-discuss that the nuclear clause
is incompatible with the ASL. If true, any components with such a
license can not be disctributed with our code or reside in SVN.
Ralph
Faulty memory. The only reference I could
On 10 Sep 2005, at 20:17, Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Ralph Goers wrote:
Ralph Goers wrote:
I seem to remember reading on legal-discuss that the nuclear
clause is incompatible with the ASL. If true, any components
with such a license can not be disctributed with our code or
reside in SVN.
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Ralph Goers wrote:
Ralph Goers wrote:
I seem to remember reading on legal-discuss that the nuclear
clause is incompatible with the ASL. If true, any components
with such a license can not be disctributed with our code or
reside in SVN.
David Crossley wrote:
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Ralph Goers wrote:
Ralph Goers wrote:
I seem to remember reading on legal-discuss that the nuclear
clause is incompatible with the ASL. If true, any components
with such a license can not be disctributed with our
On 11 Sep 2005, at 01:19, David Crossley wrote:
I found it!
http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@cocoon.apache.org/msg18202.html
Darn... I wish you found that when I posted the license before
committing...
http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@cocoon.apache.org/msg34406.html
The License that Pier
On 11 Sep 2005, at 01:23, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
We have a Legal VP now :-)
Pier, if you want to use that code, send a comment to Cliff.
Skolnick or Wooley?
Also, we could also tell sun to remove that clause or to relicense
under CDDL.
Nah, just make some mock classes and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: pier
Date: Fri Sep 9 05:56:29 2005
New Revision: 279762
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=279762view=rev
Log:
Adding SCHEMATRON (ISO and non) grammar identifiers for Gianugo.
Importing Sun's MSV (it has an Apache license)
Added:
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: pier
Date: Fri Sep 9 05:56:29 2005
New Revision: 279762
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=279762view=rev
Log:
Adding SCHEMATRON (ISO and non) grammar identifiers for Gianugo.
Importing Sun's MSV (it has an Apache license)
Added:
Ralph Goers wrote:
I seem to remember reading on legal-discuss that the nuclear clause
is incompatible with the ASL. If true, any components with such a
license can not be disctributed with our code or reside in SVN.
Ralph
Faulty memory. The only reference I could find was at
13 matches
Mail list logo
