Stefano Mazzocchi dijo:
Gump wrote:
main:
[mkdir] Created dir:
/home/gump/workspaces2/public/workspace/cocoon/build/cocoon-04112004/blocks/ojb/mocks
[javac] Compiling 7 source files to
/home/gump/workspaces2/public/workspace/cocoon/build/cocoon-04112004/blocks/ojb/mocks
[javac]
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
snip/
In the (often cited on this list) article: Enforcing Strict Model
View Separation in Template Engines, by Terence Parr
http://www.cs.usfca.edu/~parrt/papers/mvc.templates.pdf, a number of
rules for strict separation between model and view are
Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
What that means is that a convertor should be able to do the following
conversions:
- string+locale -- object : parsing request parameters
- object+locale -- string : producing the value of an input
- object+locale+channel -- xml fragment : producing the output view
for
Hi all,
I have a problem with the new portal engine. I have several coplets,
placed under different tabs. Most of the coplets (if not all) are flow
applications, just like the coplets under the App tab in the portal
sample.
Some of these flow applications use CForms, and these coplets are the
I've send this message earlier this morning, but it didn't seem that it
made it to the dev-list. So I'll send it again, sorry for anyone who
receives this more than once...
Hi all,
I have a problem with the new portal engine. I have several coplets,
placed under different tabs. Most of the
Repost from users@,
Can anyone explain me why
${mystring.substring(mystring.indexOf('abc'))} works,
${mystring.substring(mystring.indexOf('abc') - 3)} works
but
${mystring.substring(mystring.indexOf('abc') + 3 )} *not* ?
Note that the 3 is irrelevant here, the match occurs somewhere in the
middle
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Leszek Gawron wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
This is an interesting idea, which could be even more useful if the
convertors were able not only to produce strings, but also XML
snippets for output-only data. For example, we may want an email
address to be rendered as a a
Leszek Gawron wrote:
Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
What that means is that a convertor should be able to do the
following conversions:
- string+locale -- object : parsing request parameters
- object+locale -- string : producing the value of an input
- object+locale+channel -- xml fragment : producing
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Michael Gerzabek wrote:
Of course you can do. When you declare a sitemap flow function call
like above your flow method must be declared like
function myJavaFlowMethod( foo ) {
}
and a print( foo ); within this method should show bar in your
Console.
I strongly suggest
Giacomo Pati wrote:
On Tue, 2 Nov 2004, Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Giacomo Pati wrote:
Ok, guys, lets see if we can find a consensus for this issue.
The issues have been:
- Excalibur Event package is deprecated. We need a replacement of those
functionalities we are in need for the core (scheduling
To whom it may satisfy...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project cocoon-block-proxy *no longer* has an issue.
The current state of this project
On Fri, 5 Nov 2004, Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Giacomo Pati wrote:
A thread pool consists of:
- max. # of threads that run simultaneously
- a possible queue to stack up ready to run Runnables
If you have a lot of short living Runnables at low priority (logically)
you'd prefere to have a thread pool
On Fri, 2004-11-05 at 14:02 +0100, Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
If I would be able to choose convertors I might decide IN VIEW ITSELF
that that specific model value should be coloured/pretty
printed/rendered according to some specific logic. As long as this
logic has read-only access to
Hi all,
Why are repeaters not ValidationErrorAware? I have the requirement that
my repeater contains at least 1 row. I can check that with a JavaScript
validator, but where can I set the error? Should Repeater implement
ValidationErrorAware for this kind of use cases?
Bart.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31012.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32083.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32083.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32083.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32083.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32083.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Gump wrote:
To whom it may satisfy...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project cocoon-block-proxy *no longer* has an issue.
It worked!! :-)
Gosh,
Jonas Ekstedt wrote:
On Fri, 2004-11-05 at 14:02 +0100, Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
If I would be able to choose convertors I might decide IN VIEW ITSELF
that that specific model value should be coloured/pretty
printed/rendered according to some specific logic. As long as this
logic has
Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
Seem like an excelent idea to me. I think it could be analog to the use
of the class attribute in HTML to give hints to CSS about styling.
We could have something like:
${month/balance?class=financialValue}
The comparison to CSS class is adequate in this situation. Very
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32083.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31297.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Tim Larson wrote:
Sorry for this late answer, I was out of office today (woke up a 5am to
go to the airport :-/ )
I have given further thought to some issues that were raised
and this has changed my opinion on branching cforms into the
whiteboard, and caused me to also want to clarify some other
Bart Molenkamp wrote:
Hi all,
Why are repeaters not ValidationErrorAware? I have the requirement that
my repeater contains at least 1 row. I can check that with a JavaScript
validator, but where can I set the error? Should Repeater implement
ValidationErrorAware for this kind of use cases?
A
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Michael Gerzabek wrote:
Of course you can do. When you declare a sitemap flow function call
like above your flow method must be declared like
function myJavaFlowMethod( foo ) {
}
and a print( foo ); within this method should show bar in your
Console.
On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 09:58:43PM +0100, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Tim Larson wrote:
Sorry for this late answer, I was out of office today (woke up a 5am to
go to the airport :-/ )
No problem, we all have different schedules to juggle.
Thank you very much for taking the time to consider and
(I just sent this to the user list but Tim suggested I send it here as well)
Hey all --
I have a situation where I have a generator calling a cocoon:// source,
and I would like to be able to return a value to the calling pipeline.
My current solution is for the called pipeline to put this value
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32083.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Thu, 2004-11-04 at 23:42 +0100, Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
I prefer the request processor idea to the current form population where
each widget reads it data from the request object. The current scheme
makes CForms unecesarily bound to the request parameter model of input
data. With a
Hi Steven:
What about a Session Attribute? Is this a solution? Can you explain more
whta are you trying to do and maybe we can findanother solution. ;-)
Best regards,
Antonio Gallardo
Steve Krulewitz dijo:
(I just sent this to the user list but Tim suggested I send it here as
well)
Hey all
Hi:
just updatedcocoon 2.2 and it fails:
cocoon-block-javaflow-compile:
Compiling 28 source files to
/home/agallardo/svn/cocoon-2.2/build/cocoon-2.2.0-dev/blocks/javaflow/dest
/home/agallardo/svn/cocoon-2.2/src/blocks/javaflow/java/org/apache/cocoon/components/flow/java/JavaInterpreter.java:40:
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project cocoon has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects 55
ups! sorry... forgot to add the utils. fixed!
cheers
--
Torsten
36 matches
Mail list logo
