Hi Ralph,
Ralph Goers wrote at Mittwoch, 15. April 2009 03:18:
[snip]
Commons Logging's Log method has very few methods - 2 variations for
each of the 6 log levels and then the is methods.
By contrast, SLF4J supports many more variations of these, primarily
because it supports Markers
Ralph Goers wrote at Mittwoch, 15. April 2009 03:18:
By contrast, SLF4J supports many more variations of these, primarily
because it supports Markers (which I will refer to in a moment). In
addition, SLF4J supports a message syntax that in many cases
eliminates the need to wrap all the
On Apr 14, 2009, at 11:40 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Yes and no, since it was never the goal of CL to add additional
functionality, but to provide a facade for the lowest common set of
functionality (and originally it was Log4J that prevented the
addition of
the trace level ;-).
See, we
On Apr 15, 2009, at 12:08 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
Ralph Goers wrote at Mittwoch, 15. April 2009 03:18:
By contrast, SLF4J supports many more variations of these, primarily
because it supports Markers (which I will refer to in a moment). In
addition, SLF4J supports a message syntax that
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com wrote:
More and more of them are supporting SLF4J. Heck, even Apache projects are
switching.
IMO, that decision is fine, if the Apache project delivers, for
example, a complete container like Tomcat. But a component should
Ralph Goers wrote at Mittwoch, 15. April 2009 09:20:
On Apr 14, 2009, at 11:40 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Yes and no, since it was never the goal of CL to add additional
functionality, but to provide a facade for the lowest common set of
functionality (and originally it was Log4J that
Jochen Wiedmann wrote at Mittwoch, 15. April 2009 09:32:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com
wrote:
More and more of them are supporting SLF4J. Heck, even Apache projects
are switching.
IMO, that decision is fine, if the Apache project delivers, for
I think Ceki's comment at the end is quite pertinent. But in the end, my
reaction to that article is pretty much, I'd love to see a real world
example of someone doing that. I doubt you'll find many.
Some people argue that logging itself can be evil because logging too
much almost hides
On 2009-04-14, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
Open and unscheduled Issues are:
* COMPRESS-62 Need many more test cases to check that can read
real archives
* COMPRESS-64 Are the public finish() methods ArchiveOutputStream
implementations necessary and safe?
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Commons Wiki for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by ChristianGrobmeier:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CompressRoadmap
The comment on the change is:
added issues for 1.0
On Apr 15, 2009, at 1:01 AM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Jochen Wiedmann wrote at Mittwoch, 15. April 2009 09:32:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com
wrote:
More and more of them are supporting SLF4J. Heck, even Apache
projects
are switching.
IMO, that
On Apr 15, 2009, at 1:51 AM, Torsten Curdt wrote:
I think Ceki's comment at the end is quite pertinent. But in the
end, my
reaction to that article is pretty much, I'd love to see a real
world
example of someone doing that. I doubt you'll find many.
Some people argue that logging itself
On Apr 15, 2009, at 12:22 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
On Apr 15, 2009, at 12:08 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
Ralph Goers wrote at Mittwoch, 15. April 2009 03:18:
By contrast, SLF4J supports many more variations of these, primarily
because it supports Markers (which I will refer to in a moment).
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community
Yes. AOP that actually works is the nirvana that folks who love to talk
about logging dream about.
Hm ...not sure what you are implying here ...but it felt quite real to
me when we used it :)
Anyway!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
The Changeset design seems to me to be a bit assymetric at present.
ADD changes are just added to the Set of changes; however if a DELETE
is requested, then the existing set is scanned for matching additions
and any such are deleted.
I'm not sure that is very useful - why would an application
On Apr 15, 2009, at 4:28 AM, Torsten Curdt wrote:
Yes. AOP that actually works is the nirvana that folks who love to
talk
about logging dream about.
Hm ...not sure what you are implying here ...but it felt quite real to
me when we used it :)
Anyway!
My experience with AOP logging
On 15/04/2009, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
If there is a usecase for add then delete, then it seems to me that
there is likely to be a use case for delete then add. The current code
only supports the former.
Did you see ChangeSetTest.testDeletePlusAdd() ?
Yes.
Is
My experience with AOP logging solutions is limited but from what I've seen
it is possible to use AOP mechanisms to enable logging but I haven't seen
any that allow you to enable and then disable logging as desired while the
application is running.
Well, that depends what is injected by the
Hi,
I would like to ask for commons-vfs project SVN commit permission.
Looking for 2.0 version to be released.
At Apache I took part in FTPServer development before, also several patches
were submitted to axis2, commons-dpcp, commons-jxpath projects.
http://www.linkedin.com/in/vlsergey
(nick on
Oh, I`m so sorry to pick up this issue impatiently. I thought that
discussion was over but it wasn`t. Now, the discussion is still progressing
at Incubator mailing.
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Min Cha minslo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all.
Unfortunately, Commons Incubator proposal seems not
I see you still listed as a committer on FTPServer and you have an
ICLA on file.
I've been actively working trying to get a 2.0 release and would
welcome the help. What specifically do you want to do? There a few
challenging Jira issues that were found by findbugs and checkstyle
still
I'm all for Sergey to have sandbox access and a branch in the sandbox
to work on the FTP code there.
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com wrote:
I see you still listed as a committer on FTPServer and you have an ICLA on
file.
I've been actively working
23 matches
Mail list logo
