[DBCP] Commons DBCP : new release ?

Hi, I'm member of Linux Debian Java packaging team. We are currently slowly graduating to OpenJDK-6 as default JVM and Commons DBCP 1.2.X doesn't currently build with its JDBC4 API. I know that current trunk (1.3.X ?) build and run fine as I'm using it at work for load testing but I want to

Re: [vfs] VFS.getManager and FileCache

Hi Mario, coming back to this now again ... ;-) Mario Ivankovits wrote at Donnerstag, 6. August 2009 17:36: Hi! Using weak ref as default seems not too bad. However, since the file objects have just their parent cached it might lead to much more file system access then now as a parent

[net] trunk vs branches

Hi, over in Ant land we've received a bug report that Ant's ftp task wouldn't compile against commons-net 2,0 because the IMAGE_FILE_TYPE constant was removed from the FTP class. Given that trunk still has that constant, is trunk in net sort of obsolete and we should consider one of the branches

Re: [DBCP] Commons DBCP : new release ?

Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: Hi, I'm member of Linux Debian Java packaging team. We are currently slowly graduating to OpenJDK-6 as default JVM and Commons DBCP 1.2.X doesn't currently build with its JDBC4 API. I know that current trunk (1.3.X ?) build and run fine as I'm using it at work

Re: [JEXL] functional directions

Rahul Akolkar wrote: I say we keep it simple ... Fine with me. Rahul Akolkar wrote: Using that comparison, the place where JEXL excelled was to fill the gap that JSP EL had in terms of assignments, method invocations and a generally more seamless bridging to Java objects in the

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration-test (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community

Re: [JEXL] functional directions

Thanks for being crystal clear. :-) -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-JEXL--functional-directions-tp24937743p24953662.html Sent from the Commons - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-fmt-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jelly-tags-fmt-test has an issue affecting its community

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community

Re: [DBCP] Commons DBCP : new release ?

Hi, On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 06:24:38 -0400, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: We do not have an ETA, but we are close. Watch this list for release plans, RCs, etc. Reports on any issues that you may have observed running the code in trunk would be most appreciated. We are not using any

Re: [DBCP] Commons DBCP : new release ?

Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: Hi, On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 06:24:38 -0400, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: We do not have an ETA, but we are close. Watch this list for release plans, RCs, etc. Reports on any issues that you may have observed running the code in trunk would be most

Re: [DBCP] Commons DBCP : new release ?

Hi, On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 06:24:38 -0400, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: We do not have an ETA, but we are close. Watch this list for release plans, RCs, etc. Reports on any issues that you may have observed running the code in trunk would be most appreciated. We are not using