Re: [pool] GKOP test failures

2011-05-13 Thread markt
Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: I saw this Failed tests: testMaxTotalInvariant(org.apache.commons.pool2.impl.TestGenericKeyedObjectPool): Thread failed: 2 java.lang.IllegalStateException: Returned object not currently part of this pool at

Re: [OGNL] Random first thoughts

2011-05-13 Thread Henri Yandell
What about Luke Blanshard? Has he signed a CLA? Hen On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote: Hi Hen, as you noticed, Olivier already resolved the bigger part of the issues; about licensing: Drew - the project owner - donated OGNL to ASF under a signed

Re: [jci] preparing for jci 1.1 release

2011-05-13 Thread Torsten Curdt
Thanks for checking, Christian.  I have moved my code base from my old version of jci 1.1 to the trunk and everything looks good.  I did have trouble building the trunk, because the fam module is not included in the module list.  I have opened JCI-66 to address that.  I will take a look at

Re: [OGNL] Random first thoughts

2011-05-13 Thread Simone Tripodi
I wasn't able to reach Luke, AFAIK he's super busy (he works at Google) :( I would have loved to learn something from him! At least we have Drew in the PPMC. we're waiting for root@ for creating the account for him. Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Fri,

Re: [OGNL] Random first thoughts

2011-05-13 Thread Henri Yandell
So how do we relicense Drew's contributions from BSD to AL 2.0? On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 12:25 AM, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote: I wasn't able to reach Luke, AFAIK he's super busy (he works at Google) :( I would have loved to learn something from him! At least we have Drew in

Re: svn commit: r1102580 - /incubator/ognl/trunk/pom.xml

2011-05-13 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hello, I wonder if we could move most of those reporting plugins to a profile called reporting. When working on documentation, the site generation is long for only a typo fix :-). Btw the use of the reporting must be use/mandatory when pushing a release. FYI I have setup a sonar analysis which

Re: svn commit: r1102580 - /incubator/ognl/trunk/pom.xml

2011-05-13 Thread Henri Yandell
Fine by me. :) On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 12:30 AM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote: Hello, I wonder if we could move most of those reporting plugins to a profile called reporting. When working on documentation, the site generation is long for only a typo fix :-). Btw the use of the

Re: [OGNL] Random first thoughts

2011-05-13 Thread Antonio Petrelli
2011/5/13 Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com So how do we relicense Drew's contributions from BSD to AL 2.0? Henri probably in this sentence you mistook Drew with Luke. Drew signed a software grant, so now the code is Apache's. Antonio

Re: [jci] preparing for jci 1.1 release

2011-05-13 Thread Torsten Curdt
Hm ... going through the issues. We really need to drop the javac support. It was a hack. But releasing it as is will be a bit of a pain as it depends on an old jvm to just pass the tests. Maybe we should shoot for a 2.0 after all and clean things up. *sigh* On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 09:06,

Re: [OGNL] Random first thoughts

2011-05-13 Thread Henri Yandell
Ack; sorry. Juggling a baby. So how do we relicense Luke's contributions from BSD to AL 2.0? Hen On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Antonio Petrelli antonio.petre...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/5/13 Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com So how do we relicense Drew's contributions from BSD to AL 2.0?

Re: svn commit: r1102638 - /incubator/ognl/trunk/pom.xml

2011-05-13 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hello, I wonder why we need this repository, is it mandatory ? Perso don't like to see that : http://mc-repo.googlecode.com/svn/maven2/releases/org/apache/maven/plugins/maven-idea-plugin/ :-) I imagine some issues if the guy push here some other hackish maven plugins. 2011/5/13

Re: [jci] preparing for jci 1.1 release

2011-05-13 Thread sebb
On 13 May 2011 08:47, Torsten Curdt tcu...@vafer.org wrote: Hm ... going through the issues. We really need to drop the javac support. It was a hack. But releasing it as is will be a bit of a pain as it depends on an old jvm to just pass the tests. Is it really not possible to implement

[OGNL] unable to instantiate TabCharacter

2011-05-13 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi all guys, while fixing the reporting, re-enabling the commented report plugins, I got this error: [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-site-plugin:3.0-beta-3:site (default-site) on project commons-ognl: Error during page generation: Error rendering Maven report: Failed

Re: svn commit: r1102580 - /incubator/ognl/trunk/pom.xml

2011-05-13 Thread sebb
On 13 May 2011 08:30, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote: Hello, I wonder if we could move most of those reporting plugins to a profile called reporting. When working on documentation, the site generation is long for only a typo fix :-). I use the following command: mvn site -DskipTests

Re: [OGNL] unable to instantiate TabCharacter

2011-05-13 Thread sebb
On 13 May 2011 10:55, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote: Hi all guys, while fixing the reporting, re-enabling the commented report plugins, I got this error: [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-site-plugin:3.0-beta-3:site (default-site) on project

Re: [OGNL] unable to instantiate TabCharacter

2011-05-13 Thread Simone Tripodi
didn't try it yet, going it now! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:58 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 13 May 2011 10:55, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote: Hi all guys, while fixing the reporting, re-enabling the

Re: [OGNL] unable to instantiate TabCharacter

2011-05-13 Thread Simone Tripodi
yes, it fails also using maven2: [INFO] Error during page generation Embedded error: Error rendering Maven report: error while invoking generate Unable to instantiate TabCharacterCheck any hint? many thanks in advance! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On

Re: [OGNL] unable to instantiate TabCharacter

2011-05-13 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2011/5/13 Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org: Hi all guys, while fixing the reporting, re-enabling the commented report plugins, I got this error: [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-site-plugin:3.0-beta-3:site (default-site) on project commons-ognl: Error

Re: [OGNL] unable to instantiate TabCharacter

2011-05-13 Thread Antonio Petrelli
2011/5/13 Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org Hi all guys, while fixing the reporting, re-enabling the commented report plugins, I got this error: [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-site-plugin:3.0-beta-3:site (default-site) on project commons-ognl: Error

Re: [jci] preparing for jci 1.1 release

2011-05-13 Thread Torsten Curdt
We really need to drop the javac support. It was a hack. But releasing it as is will be a bit of a pain as it depends on an old jvm to just pass the tests. Is it really not possible to implement javac support with a more recent JVM? It is - that is the jsr199 compiler that needs to be

Re: svn commit: r1102638 - /incubator/ognl/trunk/pom.xml

2011-05-13 Thread Simone Tripodi
Bonjour Olivier! I don't even know what this plugin does :) feel free to drop it in favor of something closer to our needs! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote: Hello, I wonder why we need

Re: [pool] GKOP test failures

2011-05-13 Thread Mark Thomas
On 13/05/2011 07:25, ma...@apache.org wrote: Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: I saw this Failed tests: testMaxTotalInvariant(org.apache.commons.pool2.impl.TestGenericKeyedObjectPool): Thread failed: 2 java.lang.IllegalStateException: Returned object not currently part of this

Re: [jci] preparing for jci 1.1 release

2011-05-13 Thread sebb
On 13 May 2011 11:09, Torsten Curdt tcu...@vafer.org wrote: We really need to drop the javac support. It was a hack. But releasing it as is will be a bit of a pain as it depends on an old jvm to just pass the tests. Is it really not possible to implement javac support with a more recent JVM?

[OGNL] description should treat OGNL as an adjective

2011-05-13 Thread sebb
For trademark purposes, component names need to be used as adjectives, not nouns. So I suggest: descriptionApache Commons OGNL is a Java development framework ... is changed to something like: descriptionThe Apache Commons OGNL library is a Java development framework ...

Re: [pool] GKOP test failures

2011-05-13 Thread Mark Thomas
On 13/05/2011 11:20, Mark Thomas wrote: On 13/05/2011 07:25, ma...@apache.org wrote: Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: I saw this Failed tests: testMaxTotalInvariant(org.apache.commons.pool2.impl.TestGenericKeyedObjectPool): Thread failed: 2 java.lang.IllegalStateException:

[POOL] Javadoc errors

2011-05-13 Thread sebb
Eclipse reports quite a lot of Javadoc errors, for example Javadoc: WHEN_EXHAUSTED_BLOCK cannot be resolved or is not a field This is because the field is now an enum. Likewise in LinkedBlockingDeque Javadoc: Unexpected tag is generated for all the Javadoc of the form: * @throws

Re: [OGNL] description should treat OGNL as an adjective

2011-05-13 Thread Simone Tripodi
done, thanks for reviewing! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 12:29 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: For trademark purposes, component names need to be used as adjectives, not nouns. So I suggest: descriptionApache Commons OGNL

Re: [OGNL] description should treat OGNL as an adjective

2011-05-13 Thread sebb
On 13 May 2011 11:42, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote: done, thanks for reviewing! You seem to have left out the noun library from both fixes, so OGNL is still being used as an adjective. library is the noun which turns OGNL into an adjective. c.f. La bella La bella ragazza ;-)

Re: [OGNL] description should treat OGNL as an adjective

2011-05-13 Thread Simone Tripodi
Sorry, overlooked the noun :P Nice example, good Italian! :D Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 12:49 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 13 May 2011 11:42, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote: done, thanks for reviewing!

Re: [jci] preparing for jci 1.1 release

2011-05-13 Thread Torsten Curdt
It is - that is the jsr199 compiler that needs to be finished. It would be great to finish that and not look back. Although I made some progress I don't think I have the time. AFAICT, JSR199 also requires Java 1.6? Indeed. But I am quite positive very few people (if any) use the javac hack

Re: svn commit: r1102580 - /incubator/ognl/trunk/pom.xml

2011-05-13 Thread Olivier Lamy
I have committed something more 'fingers saving :-) mvn site -DskipReports btw as some reports are declared in commons-parent some are still used. 2011/5/13 sebb seb...@gmail.com: On 13 May 2011 08:30, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote: Hello, I wonder if we could move most of those

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons NET 3.0` based on RC1

2011-05-13 Thread sebb
On 10 May 2011 15:13, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: This is a vote to release Apache Commons NET 3.0 based on RC1. [X] +1 release it [ ] +0 go ahead I don't care [ ] -1 no, do not release it because... tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/net/tags/NET_3_0_RC1/ (r1101459)

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons NET 3.0` based on RC1

2011-05-13 Thread Jörg Schaible
sebb wrote: On 10 May 2011 15:13, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: This is a vote to release Apache Commons NET 3.0 based on RC1. [X] +1 release it [ ] +0 go ahead I don't care [ ] -1 no, do not release it because... tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/net/tags/NET_3_0_RC1/

Re: [pool] GKOP test failures

2011-05-13 Thread Phil Steitz
On 5/13/11 3:20 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: On 13/05/2011 07:25, ma...@apache.org wrote: Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: I saw this Failed tests: testMaxTotalInvariant(org.apache.commons.pool2.impl.TestGenericKeyedObjectPool): Thread failed: 2 java.lang.IllegalStateException: Returned

[math] change FieldMatrix.preMultipy(Fieldvector) to FieldVector.multiply(FieldMatrix)

2011-05-13 Thread Arne Ploese
Hi, IMHO it would be cleaner code to write v.multipy(m).someotherCalculations() instead (the current implementation) m.preMultiply(v)..someotherCalculations(). The execution order goes now strict from left to right... Arne -

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons NET 3.0` based on RC1

2011-05-13 Thread Phil Steitz
On 5/13/11 6:50 AM, Jörg Schaible wrote: sebb wrote: On 10 May 2011 15:13, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: This is a vote to release Apache Commons NET 3.0 based on RC1. [X] +1 release it [ ] +0 go ahead I don't care [ ] -1 no, do not release it because... tag:

[pool] numActive

2011-05-13 Thread Phil Steitz
I see this now in GOP javadoc for numActive. * The combined count of the currently active objects and those in the * process of being created. Under load, it may exceed {@link #_maxActive} * but there will never be more than {@link #_maxActive} created at any one * time.

[VOTE][RESULT] Release Commons NET 3.0` based on RC1

2011-05-13 Thread sebb
Thanks very much to all who voted! The voting was as follows: Luc Maisonobe +1 (*) Gary Gregory +1 (*) Oliver Heger +1 (*) Sebastian Bazley +1 (*) Joerg Schaible +1 (*) Phil Steitz +1 (*) There were 5 +1 votes (all binding) and no others, so the vote passes.

Re: svn commit: r1102928 - /incubator/ognl/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/ognl/OgnlContext.java

2011-05-13 Thread sebb
On 14 May 2011 00:55, simonetrip...@apache.org wrote: Author: simonetripodi Date: Fri May 13 23:55:05 2011 New Revision: 1102928 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1102928view=rev Log: HashSet is more than enough to check reserved words Modified:    

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-scxml-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2011-05-13 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This