While the l'n'f can be easily changed - it is just a matter of assign
styles - not all strict commons customizations are not included in the
skin, since it is a general skin with the purpose to serve not only
commons.
I don't see other solution ATM than forking the skin if we intend to
apply it,
On Nov 27, 2011, at 11:42, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com wrote:
On Nov 27, 2011, at 5:54 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
Do we have a Maven Jira?
I assume you are asking if anyone has opened an issue in Maven's Jira?
Any interest in a short burst of [commons] energy from this ML to
Hello,
Le 14/11/2011 16:34, luc.maison...@free.fr a écrit :
Hi Gilles,
- Mail original -
Hi.
[...]
In this case, the new API with boundaries setting should not be
set
at
the level of the abstract class that is share by CMA-ES, Bobyqa,
Nelder-Mead and MultiDirectional.
You
Hi Erhan,
for JSR303 I suggest you adopting Apache BeanValidation[1].
HTH!
Simo
[1] http://incubator.apache.org/bval/cwiki/index.html
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at
Hi Everyone,
After a bunch of work, I was able to genericize chain into using contexts
with the signature ContextK, V as per Paul's suggestion. It took sweeping
code changes to the chain codebase. Please see the patch attached to the
issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CHAIN-58
The
Thanks for your reply.
I think that it's a project which seems to be discontinued.
The last reply on Jira is from August.
Maybe they do need some contribution support from newcomers :-)
Am 27.11.2011 um 19:39 schrieb Simone Tripodi:
Hi Erhan,
for JSR303 I suggest you adopting Apache
Dear all,
After a pretty long cycle, JEXL 2.1 is ready for review.
Here is a quick list of new features (from the release notes):
What's new in 2.1:
==
* A more thorough arithmetic (JexlArithmetic) that allows fine control over
decimals (scale and precision), a
new syntax for
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Erhan Bagdemir
erhan.bagde...@googlemail.com wrote:
Thanks for your reply.
I think that it's a project which seems to be discontinued.
The last reply on Jira is from August.
Maybe they do need some contribution support from newcomers :-)
I assure you, the Bean
I see 35 Clirr Errors that point to backwards incompatibility.
So... do we have a Commons-wide policy of changing package names and making
a major release (3.0 vs. 2.1 here) or not?
Gary
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Henri Biestro hen...@apache.org wrote:
Dear all,
After a pretty long
On 28 November 2011 01:03, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
I see 35 Clirr Errors that point to backwards incompatibility.
Many of these relate to the parser, which is not really part of the public API.
However, there are some which do look like they break binary compatibility
So...
Sorry, I missed this. I've done something like this before. Ping me
in a few days. :)
Matt
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 5:58 AM, Simone Tripodi
simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Hi James!
many thanks in advance!!! All the best,
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
I like the skin. Does it also provide syntax highlighting for Java
snippets ?
I haven't tested the skin on a wide screen, does it expand on the whole
width or is there a maximum width? The readability is usually considered
better when the lines of text aren't too long.
A new skin could be
Simo,
I love the new skin. I would love to see this instead of the old stuff
for commons. Who really is attracted by a site design like that we
have now (in times of designed computers, iphones etc)? It seems to me
many youngster contribute to the projects with the best looking sites,
not to the
Hello,
while working on MATH-711, I think I stumbled upon some
inconsistencies in the implementation of the Pascal distribution. In
fact, these might well be a bug, but since I'm a bit rusty on
probabilities, I would be grateful for some feedback.
Here is the thing. The header of the Javadoc
Hi,
while working on MATH-711, I noticed that the above-mentioned
distribution does not implement any of the interfaces provided. Is
there a reason for us providing only the cdf? If yes, shouldn't this
method be renamed {{cumulativeProbability}}, in order to be consistent
with other
Hi Emmanuel,
Le 28/11/2011 07:12, Emmanuel Bourg a écrit :
I like the skin. Does it also provide syntax highlighting for Java
snippets ?
I haven't tested the skin on a wide screen, does it expand on the whole
width or is there a maximum width? The readability is usually considered
better
Gary and Sebb pointed out that, per apache release rules, incompatible binaries
require new package name (i.e. jexl3).
My bad, sorry.
Henrib
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands,
Cancelled vote.
Henrib
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-commons.680414.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-JEXL-2-1-based-on-RC1-tp4113403p4114453.html
Sent from the Commons - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To
19 matches
Mail list logo
