Hi Benedikt!
don't get crazy with Assertions.* methods, they are just internal shortcuts!
OTOH I would focus the attention on public methods to invoke methods
via reflection, that would be really more useful.
Thanks for your efforts!
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
Am 26.01.2012 10:28, schrieb Simone Tripodi:
Hi Benedikt!
Hi Simo
don't get crazy with Assertions.* methods, they are just internal shortcuts!
okay, I'll just finish my general refactoring and ignore the very
special cases.
OTOH I would focus the attention on public methods to invoke
Hi Benedikt,
- we should try to get some more structure into the project. For example we
could create packages for Bean*, Class* and Argument* Interfaces and
classes.
uhm, why you think it should be helpful? ATM only interfaces and
BeanUtils class are public - which are the smaller amount of
Last mail for today :-)
Today there is a discussion on going, Tapestry vs Struts (on
tapestry-users list). Of course people are convinced of Tapestry, and
actually it is a great framework with huge benefits. And it is pretty
modern. People now say (and not only there) Struts is a dinosaur.
Well,
Guten Morgen mate,
did you intend to send the message to Struts ML? ;)
Alles gute,
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Christian Grobmeier
Oh yes, need more coffee!
Thanks for telling me
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Simone Tripodi
simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Guten Morgen mate,
did you intend to send the message to Struts ML? ;)
Alles gute,
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
you're welcome!!!
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh yes, need more coffee!
Thanks for telling me
On
Hi.
It thus becomes urgent to tackle the remaining blocking issues.
Can we please make a list of those, and of all practical matters that
prevent the preparation of the release?
MATH-621 (see also MATH-728)
* Unit test coverage: at least 6 branches of the code are not explored.
* Code
Hi all,
I am experiencing a rather annoying issue with the latest version of
commons-graph on Eclipse. Compiling with javac (maven, command line) it
works fine, but the editor still complains: e.g. line 72 of the new
FordFulkersonTestCase[1] gives a list of errors[2].
Now, I know from
P.S. for completeness:
Eclipse version: Indigo Service Release 1
Build id: 20110916-0149
OS: Mac OS X Lion
Cheers,
Claudio
On 26/01/2012 15:30, Claudio Squarcella wrote:
Hi all,
I am experiencing a rather annoying issue with the latest version of
commons-graph on Eclipse. Compiling with
Hello.
It thus becomes urgent to tackle the remaining blocking issues.
Can we please make a list of those, and of all practical matters that
prevent the preparation of the release?
Thanks and best regards,
Gilles
As far as I'm concerned, I have been concentrating recently on
Hi Claudio!!!
thanks for reporting, I have indeed the same issue - even if I thought
was just an Eclipse bug!
I honestly don't know how to fix the problem, I hope someone in the ML
can provide a solution as well - same behavior met in IntelliJ!!!
All the best,
-Simo
2012/1/26 Gilles Sadowski gil...@harfang.homelinux.org:
Hello.
It thus becomes urgent to tackle the remaining blocking issues.
Can we please make a list of those, and of all practical matters that
prevent the preparation of the release?
Thanks and best regards,
Gilles
As far as
Hello,
Hi.
It thus becomes urgent to tackle the remaining blocking issues.
Can we please make a list of those, and of all practical matters that
prevent the preparation of the release?
MATH-621 (see also MATH-728)
* Unit test coverage: at least 6 branches of the code are not explored.
Whew... I hope you guys love me. :P I decided to take a look just
because I've had to play with Eclipse before on issues like this.
What I typically find is that Eclipse has a sane reason for
complaining where it does. This time I *really* thought Eclipse was
wrong... but check this out:
In
On 26 January 2012 14:39, Gilles Sadowski gil...@harfang.homelinux.org wrote:
Hello.
It thus becomes urgent to tackle the remaining blocking issues.
Can we please make a list of those, and of all practical matters that
prevent the preparation of the release?
Thanks and best regards,
Terrific feedbacks - like always! - Matt, thanks a lot, very appreciated!!!
We do - at least, I - love you! :D
on. I can only surmise that the Oracle (?) compiler may take the
subsequent method calls into account when trying to infer type
parameters from arguments, perhaps.
I am using the
FIXED
Emanuele Lombardi, a former colleague of mine, simply did
-public static V extends Vertex, W, WE extends WeightedEdgeW, G
extends GraphV, WE SpanningTreeSourceSelectorV, W, WE, G
minimumSpanningTree( G graph )
+public static V extends Vertex, WE extends WeightedEdgeW, W, G
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Simone Tripodi
simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
FIXED
Emanuele Lombardi, a former colleague of mine, simply did
- public static V extends Vertex, W, WE extends WeightedEdgeW, G
extends GraphV, WE SpanningTreeSourceSelectorV, W, WE, G
ouch :( :(
I suspect the trick just works on IntelliJ... ;(
thanks for the feedbacks!!!
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Matt Benson
On 26/01/2012 18:05, Matt Benson wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Simone Tripodi
simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
FIXED
Emanuele Lombardi, a former colleague of mine, simply did
-public staticV extends Vertex, W, WE extends WeightedEdgeW, G
extends GraphV, WE
On 1/26/2012 6:59 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Benedikt Ritter
b...@systemoutprintln.de wrote:
But i found only discussions about durationjoda-time dated 2004.
Hi,
Le 25/01/2012 21:17, Benedikt Ritter a écrit :
Am 25.01.2012 21:02, schrieb Taras Ledkov:
I'm very sorry if this problem has been solved in some way.
No need to be sorry, as everybody can see, you did some research on this
topic ;-)
But i found only discussions about duration
Le 26/01/2012 15:39, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
Hello.
It thus becomes urgent to tackle the remaining blocking issues.
Can we please make a list of those, and of all practical matters that
prevent the preparation of the release?
Thanks and best regards,
Gilles
As far as I'm concerned, I
Le 26/01/2012 15:52, Sébastien Brisard a écrit :
Hello,
Hi.
It thus becomes urgent to tackle the remaining blocking issues.
Can we please make a list of those, and of all practical matters that
prevent the preparation of the release?
MATH-621 (see also MATH-728)
* Unit test coverage:
On Jan 26, 2012, at 10:47, Adrian Crum
adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com wrote:
On 1/26/2012 6:59 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Benedikt Ritter
b...@systemoutprintln.de wrote:
But
On Jan 26, 2012, at 3:35 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
Just to clarify: Joda is not entering the JDK. JSR-310 has been proposed and
might make it into the JDK, but JSR-310 is not Joda.
http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=310
Is this jsr dead? What's the next step?
See
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-digester3 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
30 matches
Mail list logo
