Hi Yonik,
The issue is not the fork, that's perfectly fine and your help is
really appreciated. The issue is that it was released without renaming
the package, leading to classpath conflicts when Commons CSV is released
officially.
I opened an issue for Solr:
Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
This is actually a bad joke for all of us binary compatibility lovers.
I
just noticed that Solr forked Commons CSV and released it as a separate
artifact, but kept the org.apache.commons.csv package unchanged :(
Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org wrote:
Le 06/03/2012 08:52, Jörg Schaible a écrit :
All that we can do now is to put a big red warning at commons-cvs
homepage:
== % ==
CAUTION: If you use Apache Solr you run implicitly an incompatible
version
of commons-csv that may affect
ma...@apache.org wrote:
Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org wrote:
Le 06/03/2012 08:52, Jörg Schaible a écrit :
All that we can do now is to put a big red warning at commons-cvs
homepage:
== % ==
CAUTION: If you use Apache Solr you run implicitly an incompatible
version
of
Hi Emmanuel,
Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 06/03/2012 08:52, Jörg Schaible a écrit :
All that we can do now is to put a big red warning at commons-cvs
homepage:
== % ==
CAUTION: If you use Apache Solr you run implicitly an incompatible
version of commons-csv that may affect
Le 06/03/2012 10:26, ma...@apache.org a écrit :
The right way for solr to do this would be to package rename csv the same way
Tomcat does for encode.
Yes that's what I suggested. How do you do this in Tomcat? Did you copy
and rename the packages manually, or do you have a tool that
Hi Emmanuel,
Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 06/03/2012 10:26, ma...@apache.org a écrit :
The right way for solr to do this would be to package rename csv the same
way Tomcat does for encode.
Yes that's what I suggested. How do you do this in Tomcat? Did you copy
and rename the packages
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 12:15:20AM +0100, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
I ran Cobertura and uploaded the result here:
http://people.apache.org/~ebourg/math/cobertura
It took more than 4 hours to complete on my Core 2 Duo, ouch!
Thanks for the effort! :-)
At the
end JavaNCSS complained about the
The errors are occuring because some testCases are leaving an item in
the registry.
If the next test is one that checks for an empty registry at the end,
it will fail.
It's very easy to check that the registry is always left empty by
adding an @After method - I tried this and the code then fails
On Mar 6, 2012, at 6:47, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
The errors are occuring because some testCases are leaving an item in
the registry.
If the next test is one that checks for an empty registry at the end,
it will fail.
It's very easy to check that the registry is always left empty by
The Solr team isn't listening, the issue was closed as Won't Fix,
*sighs*...
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3204
Emmanuel Bourg
Le 06/03/2012 02:12, Emmanuel Bourg a écrit :
Hi,
This is actually a bad joke for all of us binary compatibility lovers. I
just noticed that Solr
I don't recall if a board report is required or not, but I would send one even
if it isn't required. Obviously, the Solr team doesn't understand what they
have done. However, if Solr considers CSV good enough to use in their
application then it is definitely time to do a release of CSV.
Ralph
Added my thought to this issue. MIght be better than here where they
are not reading.
Let's hope they come around.
cheers,
Torsten
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
On 6 March 2012 14:33, Torsten Curdt tcu...@vafer.org wrote:
Added my thought to this issue. MIght be better than here where they
are not reading.
Let's hope they come around.
I think we should consider changing the package name/Maven id for the
first official release of CSV.
This would force
On 6 March 2012 12:52, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 6, 2012, at 6:47, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
The errors are occuring because some testCases are leaving an item in
the registry.
If the next test is one that checks for an empty registry at the end,
it will fail.
On 6 March 2012 09:15, simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Author: simonetripodi
Date: Tue Mar 6 09:15:10 2012
New Revision: 1297393
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1297393view=rev
Log:
explicit use of the surefire-report plugin to aggregate test results
Modified:
Commons CSV is approaching a releasable state. Considering the general
interest in this component I think it's time to promote it to Commons
proper.
There are a few points I'd like to address before a release:
- Handle CSV headers, a CSV API looks incomplete to me without this
- Examine the
I'm not an committer, but I've been monitoring the CSV project for a
couple of years and I'm really happy to see it trying to emerge from
the sandbox. If it does go to release, I will be dropping OpenCsv and
switching to it for my projects both personal and professional.
Please accept my virtual
+1
On Mar 6, 2012, at 6:42 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Commons CSV is approaching a releasable state. Considering the general
interest in this component I think it's time to promote it to Commons proper.
There are a few points I'd like to address before a release:
- Handle CSV headers, a
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org wrote:
Commons CSV is approaching a releasable state. Considering the general
interest in this component I think it's time to promote it to Commons
proper.
There are a few points I'd like to address before a release:
- Handle
On 03/06/2012 06:42 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Commons CSV is approaching a releasable state. Considering the general
interest in this component I think it's time to promote it to Commons
proper.
There are a few points I'd like to address before a release:
- Handle CSV headers, a CSV API
Hi,
CODEC-95 talked about these issues, too (in this case with Base64).
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-95
Personally, I would prefer to see some new strict classes defined,
and to preserve the garbage-in/garbage-out behaviour on the current
existing classes.
Here are the new
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Commons Wiki for
change notification.
The MathWishList page has been changed by SebastienBrisard:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/MathWishList?action=diffrev1=72rev2=73
= Commons-Math Wish List =
A list of feature
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Commons Wiki for
change notification.
The MathWishList page has been changed by SebastienBrisard:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/MathWishList?action=diffrev1=73rev2=74
= Commons-Math Wish List =
A list of feature
What about passing in a boolean strict to the constructor of the codecs?
Gary
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Julius Davies juliusdav...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
CODEC-95 talked about these issues, too (in this case with Base64).
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-95
Personally, I
+1
On 2012-03-06 18:42, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Commons CSV is approaching a releasable state. Considering the general
interest in this component I think it's time to promote it to Commons
proper.
There are a few points I'd like to address before a release:
- Handle CSV headers, a CSV API
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Commons Wiki for
change notification.
The LinearPackageInterfaceSimplification page has been changed by
SebastienBrisard:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/LinearPackageInterfaceSimplification
New page:
= Simplification of
Le 06/03/2012 15:01, Ralph Goers a écrit :
I don't recall if a board report is required or not, but I would send one
even if it isn't required. Obviously, the Solr team doesn't understand what
they have done. However, if Solr considers CSV good enough to use in their
application then it is
On 6 March 2012 19:33, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
What about passing in a boolean strict to the constructor of the codecs?
What does strict mean? See my comment:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-95#comment-12986951
If we do add another parameter (which is not popular
+1
On 6 March 2012 19:35, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote:
+1
On 2012-03-06 18:42, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Commons CSV is approaching a releasable state. Considering the general
interest in this component I think it's time to promote it to Commons
proper.
There are a few points I'd
Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Commons CSV is approaching a releasable state. Considering the general
interest in this component I think it's time to promote it to Commons
proper.
There are a few points I'd like to address before a release:
- Handle CSV headers, a CSV API looks incomplete to me
Could you please open a ticket in our bug tracking system [1], so that
this report does not get lost?
BTW: Please note that iss...@commons.apache.org is used only for
automatically generated mail notifications. The mailing list you should
use for postings like this is dev@commons.apache.org.
Le 06/03/2012 22:09, Gary Gregory a écrit :
Let's not hesitate to go to Java 6 if it helps.
Gary
I do consider Java 6. I'm pondering if Commons CSV can be plugged with
JAXB to implement the bean parsing.
Emmanuel Bourg
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
On Tuesday, March 06, 2012 at 3:20 AM, Sébastien Brisard
sebastien.bris...@m4x.org wrote:
Thanks for your suggestion ! I Downloaded the sources and i will
check them soon. If I am correct , Maxima is implemented in Lisp
(or CLisp) but I guess it could be feasible , once they had been
Thanks for your suggestion ! I Downloaded the sources and i will
check them soon. If I am correct , Maxima is implemented in Lisp
(or
CLisp) but I guess it could be feasible , once they had been
analyzed
and studied , to translate those algorithms into Java.
Maxima is GPL licensed. We
On 6 March 2012 21:50, ggreg...@apache.org wrote:
Author: ggregory
Date: Tue Mar 6 21:50:04 2012
New Revision: 1297741
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1297741view=rev
Log:
Add JIRA report for all versions so you can see what has been fixed no matter
what version you are updating
On 6 March 2012 22:35, ggreg...@apache.org wrote:
Author: ggregory
Date: Tue Mar 6 22:35:30 2012
New Revision: 1297767
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1297767view=rev
Log:
Set the 1.4 release date. I should have done this before the release.
Surely we don't normally put release
Hello Leandro.
Thanks for your suggestion ! I Downloaded the sources and i will
check them soon. If I am correct , Maxima is implemented in Lisp
(or CLisp) but I guess it could be feasible , once they had been
analyzed and studied , to translate those algorithms into Java.
That's
That's not the right conclusion.
If there had been arguments against including some feature, you
would have
gotten a response. :-)
You are totally right Gilles , I apologize for jumping to that conclusion.
The central point is: It's is not primarily other people that have
to be
interested in
+1
Niall
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org wrote:
Commons CSV is approaching a releasable state. Considering the general
interest in this component I think it's time to promote it to Commons
proper.
There are a few points I'd like to address before a release:
I still think it should be renamed, but I think I lost that battle.
It's not just for comma-separated values. I'd rather us come up with
a more generic name. I'm +1 for moving it out of the sandbox. It
needs a bit of polish before a release, though, IMHO.
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 12:42 PM,
On 7 March 2012 01:43, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
I still think it should be renamed, but I think I lost that battle.
Given the release by Solr, perhaps now would be a good time to
revisit that discussion.
It would solve any package name clashes without needing to call it
Let's start a separate thread for naming then.
Gary
On Mar 6, 2012, at 20:43, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
I still think it should be renamed, but I think I lost that battle.
It's not just for comma-separated values. I'd rather us come up with
a more generic name. I'm +1
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-digester3 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-lang3-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
Maybe time to add a Base64(int mode) constructor! Yay, room for 32
true/false bitwise fields!
Sorry I can't respond inline to the email like a normal person. Bad habit.
yours,
Julius
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 11:40 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6 March 2012 19:33, Gary Gregory
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Commons Wiki for
change notification.
The LinearPackageInterfaceSimplification page has been changed by
SebastienBrisard:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/LinearPackageInterfaceSimplification?action=diffrev1=1rev2=2
=
On Mar 6, 2012, at 8:51 PM, sebb wrote:
On 7 March 2012 01:43, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
I still think it should be renamed, but I think I lost that battle.
Given the release by Solr, perhaps now would be a good time to
revisit that discussion.
It would solve any
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Commons Wiki for
change notification.
The LinearPackageInterfaceSimplification page has been changed by
SebastienBrisard:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/LinearPackageInterfaceSimplification?action=diffrev1=2rev2=3
===
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Commons Wiki for
change notification.
The LinearPackageInterfaceSimplification page has been changed by
SebastienBrisard:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/LinearPackageInterfaceSimplification?action=diffrev1=3rev2=4
=
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Commons Wiki for
change notification.
The LinearPackageInterfaceSimplification page has been changed by
SebastienBrisard:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/LinearPackageInterfaceSimplification?action=diffrev1=4rev2=5
==
Hi Seb!
+
+ surefire.version2.12/surefire.version
Commons Parent 23 has
commons.surefire.version2.9/commons.surefire.version
Would it work to override this instead?
yeah! didn't notice it, it does!
+ artifactIdmaven-surefire-report-plugin/artifactId
+
53 matches
Mail list logo
