To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-id has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-vfs2-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
Hello,
it would be nice to have an interpreter for mathematical expressions so that
functions may be defined at runtime.
Example for f(x):
ExpInter ei = new ExpInter();
ei.setFunction(ln(3*sin(2*x)+3));
// Plot the function:
for (double x=0.0;x3.0;x+=0.1) {
y = ei(x);
// ... do
2012/3/27 Detlef Günther detlef.guent...@gmx.net
Hello,
it would be nice to have an interpreter for mathematical expressions so
that functions may be defined at runtime.
Example for f(x):
ExpInter ei = new ExpInter();
ei.setFunction(ln(3*sin(2*x)+3));
// Plot the function:
for
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com
wrote:
2012/3/27 Detlef Günther detlef.guent...@gmx.net
Hello,
it would be nice to have an interpreter for mathematical expressions so
that functions may be defined at runtime.
[snip]
ah something else I have
2012/3/27 Detlef Günther detlef.guent...@gmx.net:
Hello,
it would be nice to have an interpreter for mathematical expressions so that
functions may be defined at runtime.
Example for f(x):
ExpInter ei = new ExpInter();
ei.setFunction(ln(3*sin(2*x)+3));
// Plot the function:
for
Hello.
it would be nice to have an interpreter for mathematical expressions so that
functions may be defined at runtime.
Example for f(x):
ExpInter ei = new ExpInter();
ei.setFunction(ln(3*sin(2*x)+3));
// Plot the function:
for (double x=0.0;x3.0;x+=0.1) {
y = ei(x);
Hi
I am a newbie to this dev list. I was going through the ArrayStack.java
in Collections and couldn't understand the difference between remove and
pop methods. Can someone let me know about it ?
thanks
Shiva
Hi Thomas,
congrace may be used by writing a wrapper Expression to UnivarteFunction:
import org.apache.commons.math3.analysis.UnivariateFunction;
import de.congrace.exp4j.Calculable;
import de.congrace.exp4j.ExpressionBuilder;
public class Expression implements UnivariateFunction {
Hi to you!
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 16:09:01 +0530
Von: Shiva Krishnan shiva.s...@gmail.com
An: dev@commons.apache.org
Betreff: [Collections] Difference between pop and remove
Hi
--
NEU: FreePhone 3-fach-Flat mit kostenlosem Smartphone!
Hi Shiva,
both seem to do the same: remove and return the top element of the stack. Since
it is a stack the pop op should be the correct one.
Regards Detlef
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 16:11:16 +0530
Von: Shiva Krishnan shiva.s...@gmail.com
An:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 12:53:25PM +0200, Detlef Günther wrote:
Hi Thomas,
congrace may be used by writing a wrapper Expression to UnivarteFunction:
import org.apache.commons.math3.analysis.UnivariateFunction;
import de.congrace.exp4j.Calculable;
import
On Mar 27, 2012, at 5:55 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
Hello.
it would be nice to have an interpreter for mathematical expressions so that
functions may be defined at runtime.
Example for f(x):
ExpInter ei = new ExpInter();
ei.setFunction(ln(3*sin(2*x)+3));
// Plot the function:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Gilles Sadowski
gil...@harfang.homelinux.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 12:53:25PM +0200, Detlef Günther wrote:
Hi Thomas,
congrace may be used by writing a wrapper Expression to
UnivarteFunction:
import
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 5:50 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/3/27 Detlef Günther detlef.guent...@gmx.net:
Hello,
it would be nice to have an interpreter for mathematical expressions so
that functions may be defined at runtime.
Example for f(x):
ExpInter ei = new ExpInter();
Hello.
[...]
But one question I would like to ask is what is the process for
arranging for a new release of Commons-Math. I ask because we have
6-month release schedule for our mathematical and utility library, which
makes use of Commons Math, and we would like to see whether we can
On 27 March 2012 13:18, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 5:50 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/3/27 Detlef Günther detlef.guent...@gmx.net:
Hello,
it would be nice to have an interpreter for mathematical expressions so
that functions may be defined
Curious, @Sebb is a new RC to change the release notes a must for you for a
+ 1?
Gary
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 2:03 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 March 2012 16:38, Gary Gregory ggreg...@apache.org wrote:
Hello All:
This is a VOTE to release Commons IO 2.2-RC4
The changes from
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
I am -1 to publishing any sort of release schedule to which we would
be held accountable.
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 8:33 AM, Gilles Sadowski
gil...@harfang.homelinux.org wrote:
Hello.
[...]
But one question I would like to ask is what is the process for
arranging for a new release of
Hi.
I am -1 to publishing any sort of release schedule to which we would
be held accountable.
I was speaking for Commons Math. IMHO, it is a disservice to the project to
have releases more than 12 months apart, as it has just been the case.
This gives the feeling that the code is stable and in
As opposed to calendar-based release scheduling, I would suggest
perhaps using a more feature-based approach. For transparency, use
JIRA's target version (or whatever it's called) to schedule which
releases will contain fixes for which issues. The reason I'm hesitant
to put something on the
+1
Gary Gregory wrote:
Hello All:
This is a VOTE to release Commons IO 2.2-RC4
The changes from RC3 are:
- IO-313: Add IOUTils.toBufferedReader(Reader)
- IO-308: Allow applications to provide buffer (or size) for copyLarge
methods.
- IO-311: IOUtils.read(InputStream/Reader) ignores
My +1,
Gary
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Gary Gregory ggreg...@apache.org wrote:
Hello All:
This is a VOTE to release Commons IO 2.2-RC4
The changes from RC3 are:
- IO-313: Add IOUTils.toBufferedReader(Reader)
- IO-308: Allow applications to provide buffer (or size) for copyLarge
Still getting the strange test failure with the ant build I reported for
one of the previous RCs, but if nobody else sees this, it may well
depend on my specific configuration.
Otherwise, everything looks good, so +1
Oliver
Am 26.03.2012 17:38, schrieb Gary Gregory:
Hello All:
This is a
Hello,
maybe we could mix both approaches.
Following James, releases could be feature-based, using the JIRA
system. If after 3 months, the goal is reached, we could release.
However, as Gilles suggested we could at least do our best to at least
try and release twice a year. This means that about
I don't have a problem saying something like we will attempt to
release at least twice per year. I don't think it would be wise to
say, we will have a release on 1/1 and 7/1 every year.
Release early! Release often! Have 12 releases a year if you want.
Just don't promise them.
On Tue, Mar 27,
I have to agree with James here. However, if the mysterious
team-who-wishes-to-contribute is dead set on 6 month release cycles,
it is certainly within their power to make sure 4.5 months ahead of
time that every open JIRA issue has a patch attached, and to nag the
team incessantly for the
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-io-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-graph has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-collections4-testframework has an issue affecting its community
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
Hello,
in preparation for 3.1, should we start the release notes anew?
Sébastien
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
Hi,
Le 27/03/2012 21:08, Matt Benson a écrit :
I have to agree with James here. However, if the mysterious
team-who-wishes-to-contribute is dead set on 6 month release cycles,
it is certainly within their power to make sure 4.5 months ahead of
time that every open JIRA issue has a patch
37 matches
Mail list logo
