Hi,
attached to MATH-784 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-784)
is a Monte-Carlo simulation which might be used to explore this issue.
For the time being, it confirms that
* guessParametersErrors() indeed estimates the sd on the parameters,
* the sqrt of the diagonal coefficients of the
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
Hi,
Hi,
attached to MATH-784 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-784)
is a Monte-Carlo simulation which might be used to explore this issue.
For the time being, it confirms that
* guessParametersErrors() indeed estimates the sd on the parameters,
* the sqrt of the diagonal coefficients
Hi Dimitri,
I think we agree on the two different concepts (sd of the parameters,
and confidence interval), and we also agree that the terminology in CM
should be precise.
For the moment, the formula for guessParametersErrors is
sqrt(chi^2 / dof * cov[i][i])
this is I believe the formula for the
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-id has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-jmx has an issue affecting its community integration.
Since pool2 uses a new package, I intend to remove all existing @since
tags that refer to 1.x and add @since 2.0 to all public
classes,interfaces, methods, constants etc. Any objections?
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On 4 May 2012 11:16, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
Since pool2 uses a new package, I intend to remove all existing @since
tags that refer to 1.x and add @since 2.0 to all public
classes,interfaces, methods, constants etc. Any objections?
No point in adding the @since to anything but
On May 4, 2012, at 6:50, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 May 2012 11:16, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
Since pool2 uses a new package, I intend to remove all existing @since
tags that refer to 1.x and add @since 2.0 to all public
classes,interfaces, methods, constants etc. Any
Hi Dimitri,
I'm obviously missing something in my litterature review. I did a new
MC simulation, with a much smaller number of observation points
(namely 3, to fit a straight line!!!). It turns out that the formula
you are advocating for is the best estimate of the standard deviation
of the
Hello,
I put it here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-801
Best regards,
Sebastien
Original Message:
-
From: Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 12:26:21 -0400
To: dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lang] Suggestion for improvement: Util for
On 13/04/2012 22:16, ma...@apache.org wrote:
sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 April 2012 20:46, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
1. Fix all the open bugs. DONE
2. Clean up the docs. DONE
3. Release 2.0.0.M1
I think we are ready for an alpha release of POOL2. I'm leaning towards
Alpha
Hello.
I'm obviously missing something in my litterature review. I did a new
MC simulation, with a much smaller number of observation points
(namely 3, to fit a straight line!!!). It turns out that the formula
you are advocating for is the best estimate of the standard deviation
of the
2012/5/4 Gilles Sadowski gil...@harfang.homelinux.org:
Hello.
I'm obviously missing something in my litterature review. I did a new
MC simulation, with a much smaller number of observation points
(namely 3, to fit a straight line!!!). It turns out that the formula
you are advocating for is
[...]
For clarity's sake (design-wise), I propose to remove the
guessParametersErrors method, and add a getSigma (as syntactic sugar).
I'm OK with that. As a first step, we deprecate it, and stipulate in
the javadoc that getSigma() should be used instead. We emphasize that
both methods
I think it would be useful to try and specify upfront which public
classes / methods etc are intended to form part of the public API, to
distinguish them from items that are public merely to allow internal
access between packages.
If changes are later needed to public classes that are documented
Hi,
I would like to call a vote from commons-email-1.3 based on RC3
Changes in this version include:
New features:
o Update the current trunk to be binary compatible with the
commons-email-1.2 release. Issue: EMAIL-111. Thanks to Florian Pirchner.
o Added unit test to ensure that parsing
Making the public api mostly interfaces (with a few immutable value
transfer classes) helps this delineation.
Chas
On 5/4/12 8:14 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
I think it would be useful to try and specify upfront which public
classes / methods etc are intended to form part of the public
On 4 May 2012 14:06, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 13/04/2012 22:16, ma...@apache.org wrote:
sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 April 2012 20:46, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
1. Fix all the open bugs. DONE
2. Clean up the docs. DONE
3. Release 2.0.0.M1
I think we are ready
In order to move classscan forward, I think we need a commons community
repository. Is any PMC willing to create one?
Thanks,
chas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 May 2012 14:06, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 13/04/2012 22:16, ma...@apache.org wrote:
sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 April 2012 20:46, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
1. Fix all the open bugs. DONE
2. Clean up the docs. DONE
3. Release
sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
I think it would be useful to try and specify upfront which public
classes / methods etc are intended to form part of the public API, to
distinguish them from items that are public merely to allow internal
access between packages.
I'd prefer to move things between
On 4 May 2012 17:11, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 May 2012 14:06, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 13/04/2012 22:16, ma...@apache.org wrote:
sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 April 2012 20:46, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
1. Fix all
Putting the internal stuff in specially-named packages would also help in
OSGi-land. The felix bundle plugin will not export anything in the impl
or internal packages.
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
I think it would be
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 12:05 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
BTW, I'm seeing test errors on Win XP:
Yeah, but who runs Win XP? ;)
I'm just having a bit of fun on Star Wars Day, not trying to start a flame war.
-
To
On 4 May 2012 18:26, s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: sebb
Date: Fri May 4 17:26:46 2012
New Revision: 1334070
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1334070view=rev
Log:
Wrong place to check for null; returning prevents any entries from being
created
This fixes the first two test
The following change to the GKOP ctor seems to fix the problem:
if (factory == null) {
this.close(); // = close the parent
throw new IllegalArgumentException(factory may not be null);
}
Not 100% sure if that is the correct fix - perhaps
Hi Gilles,
Before closing the issue, I'd like to commit the test I've attached to
MATH-784. It's not really a unit test (as it doesn't assert anything
yet) but it shows the meaning of sigma.
I've ended the class name with the string TestValidation so that it does
not run by default with the
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=21817projectId=98
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Sat 5 May 2012 01:20:25 +
Finished at: Sat 5 May 2012 01:24:50 +
Total time: 4m 24s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=21819projectId=98
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Sat 5 May 2012 02:20:19 +
Finished at: Sat 5 May 2012 02:24:40 +
Total time: 4m 20s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Hi,
Before closing the issue, I'd like to commit the test I've attached to
MATH-784. It's not really a unit test (as it doesn't assert anything
yet) but it shows the meaning of sigma.
I've ended the class name with the string TestValidation so that it does
not run by default with the test
32 matches
Mail list logo
