Makes sense for me t dro serialization support for 1.0. If users really
demand it, it can be added afterwards.
Benedikt
2013/10/31 Bruno P. Kinoshita brunodepau...@yahoo.com.br
Hi all,
I posted it in the mailing list some time ago and now I will have time to
work on this during the next
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Commons Wiki for
change notification.
The ContributorsGroup page has been changed by sebbapache:
https://wiki.apache.org/commons/ContributorsGroup?action=diffrev1=6rev2=7
* AdminGroup
* ArchanaAcharya
* AteDouma
+
Hello,
please add me (user AxelSchwolow) to the Contributors Group
https://wiki.apache.org/commons/ContributorsGroup so that I can
edit the Commons Wiki pages. Thanks!
Done
On 31 October 2013 08:03, Axel Schwolow axel.schwo...@gmx.de wrote:
Hello,
please add me (user AxelSchwolow) to the Contributors Group
https://wiki.apache.org/commons/ContributorsGroup so that I can
edit the Commons Wiki pages. Thanks!
On 30/10/2013 19:52, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
On my machine the tests take forever to run, about 5 minutes for mvn test.
I guess this is normal? (haven't looked into the tests in detail)
Yes, that is normal. A number of the tests check various timeouts
(eviction, abandoned objects etc.) so they
On 30/10/2013 21:36, sebb wrote:
On 30 October 2013 19:31, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 30/10/2013 17:52, Mark Thomas wrote:
snip/
Please review the release candidate and vote.
This vote will close no sooner that 72 hours from now
[ ] +1 Release these artifacts
[ ] +0
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Commons Wiki for
change notification.
The VFS page has been changed by AxelSchwolow:
https://wiki.apache.org/commons/VFS?action=diffrev1=16rev2=17
* [[http://sourceforge.net/projects/loopy/|Loopy]] - Loopy is ISO9660
On 31/10/2013 12:10, s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: sebb
Date: Thu Oct 31 12:10:34 2013
New Revision: 1537461
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1537461
Log:
Apache branding
Any more changes for Pool in the pipeline or is it safe for me to go
ahead and roll Pool 2.0 RC2?
Mark
On 31 October 2013 12:20, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 31/10/2013 12:10, s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: sebb
Date: Thu Oct 31 12:10:34 2013
New Revision: 1537461
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1537461
Log:
Apache branding
Any more changes for Pool in the pipeline or is it safe for
On 31 October 2013 12:51, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 31 October 2013 12:20, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 31/10/2013 12:10, s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: sebb
Date: Thu Oct 31 12:10:34 2013
New Revision: 1537461
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1537461
Log:
Apache branding
Any
Hi Benedikt,
On 28.10.13 12:53, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
Trunk already contains 2.0-SNAPSHOT so it looks like someone intended to
roll out a new major release.
Yep, that was me. And yes, this is my intention. The said issue must be
fixed first, however. And I'm planning to add some JMX
Hello.
Are there criteria about filling the due-to attribute of an issue
record in the changes.xml file?
Current practice seems that reporting an issue does not by itself
warrants such an attribution.
Indeed, as I understand it, the attribute is a place-holder for when
an issue is fixed by a
On 31 October 2013 13:26, Gilles gil...@harfang.homelinux.org wrote:
Hello.
Are there criteria about filling the due-to attribute of an issue
record in the changes.xml file?
Current practice seems that reporting an issue does not by itself
warrants such an attribution.
Indeed, as I
On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 13:37:02 +, sebb wrote:
On 31 October 2013 13:26, Gilles gil...@harfang.homelinux.org
wrote:
Hello.
Are there criteria about filling the due-to attribute of an issue
record in the changes.xml file?
Current practice seems that reporting an issue does not by itself
On 31 October 2013 13:44, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 31/10/2013 12:59, sebb wrote:
On 31 October 2013 12:51, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 31 October 2013 12:20, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 31/10/2013 12:10, s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: sebb
Date: Thu Oct 31
On 31 October 2013 14:36, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 31 October 2013 13:44, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 31/10/2013 12:59, sebb wrote:
On 31 October 2013 12:51, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 31 October 2013 12:20, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 31/10/2013 12:10,
Development on Pool 2 is complete and a review of the remaining DBCP
bugs has not highlighted any that are likely to trigger significant API
changes in Pool so it is time for a release.
The Pool 2.0 RC2 is available for review here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/pool/ (r3386)
Sure, go ahead. :)
Matt
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 1:25 AM, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org wrote:
Makes sense for me t dro serialization support for 1.0. If users really
demand it, it can be added afterwards.
Benedikt
2013/10/31 Bruno P. Kinoshita brunodepau...@yahoo.com.br
Hi all,
On 31/10/2013 15:13, s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: sebb
Date: Thu Oct 31 15:13:47 2013
New Revision: 1537525
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1537525
Log:
Document that CCE is handled OK; there is no unchecked warning happening
here
Why did you make this change? It undoes a recent commit
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Gilles gil...@harfang.homelinux.orgwrote:
The person who raised the bug still took the trouble to do so.
My question is still: is it sufficient?
Without filing a bug report, the reporter is harming himself.
Also, some reports are only feature requests. I
On 31 October 2013 15:26, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 31/10/2013 15:13, s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: sebb
Date: Thu Oct 31 15:13:47 2013
New Revision: 1537525
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1537525
Log:
Document that CCE is handled OK; there is no unchecked warning happening
On 31/10/2013 15:36, sebb wrote:
On 31 October 2013 15:26, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 31/10/2013 15:13, s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: sebb
Date: Thu Oct 31 15:13:47 2013
New Revision: 1537525
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1537525
Log:
Document that CCE is handled OK; there is
On 31 October 2013 14:24, Gilles gil...@harfang.homelinux.org wrote:
On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 13:37:02 +, sebb wrote:
On 31 October 2013 13:26, Gilles gil...@harfang.homelinux.org wrote:
Hello.
Are there criteria about filling the due-to attribute of an issue
record in the changes.xml file?
On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:30:16 -0400, Ted Dunning wrote:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Gilles
gil...@harfang.homelinux.orgwrote:
The person who raised the bug still took the trouble to do so.
My question is still: is it sufficient?
Without filing a bug report, the reporter is harming
On 31 October 2013 15:51, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 31/10/2013 15:36, sebb wrote:
On 31 October 2013 15:26, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 31/10/2013 15:13, s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: sebb
Date: Thu Oct 31 15:13:47 2013
New Revision: 1537525
URL:
On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 15:53:29 +, sebb wrote:
On 31 October 2013 14:24, Gilles gil...@harfang.homelinux.org
wrote:
On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 13:37:02 +, sebb wrote:
On 31 October 2013 13:26, Gilles gil...@harfang.homelinux.org
wrote:
Hello.
Are there criteria about filling the due-to
On 10/31/2013 05:18 PM, Gilles wrote:
On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 15:53:29 +, sebb wrote:
On 31 October 2013 14:24, Gilles gil...@harfang.homelinux.org wrote:
On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 13:37:02 +, sebb wrote:
On 31 October 2013 13:26, Gilles gil...@harfang.homelinux.org wrote:
Hello.
Are there
On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 17:35:50 +0100, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
On 10/31/2013 05:18 PM, Gilles wrote:
On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 15:53:29 +, sebb wrote:
On 31 October 2013 14:24, Gilles gil...@harfang.homelinux.org
wrote:
On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 13:37:02 +, sebb wrote:
On 31 October 2013 13:26,
GitHub user anilbharadia opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/12
added the new JsonToStringStyle
a simple ToStringStyle which outputs the String representation of the
object in json format.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by
On 10/14/2013 08:39 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
Can someone add my wiki name (AteDouma) to the Contributors Group page [1]?
Thanks, Ate
[1] https://wiki.apache.org/commons/ContributorsGroup
Could somebody please add me to some group so that I can change some
pages on the wiki? My wiki name is
On 10/30/2013 12:37 AM, Matt Adereth wrote:
I'm not impatient, just following the instructions from the developer guide
which says to nudge if a patch goes unnoticed for a few days...
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-814
Hi Matt,
thanks for the patch and nudge. Your patch is
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Commons Wiki for
change notification.
The ContributorsGroup page has been changed by sebbapache:
https://wiki.apache.org/commons/ContributorsGroup?action=diffrev1=7rev2=8
* PhilSteitz
* SebastienBrisard
*
done
On 31 October 2013 22:54, Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/14/2013 08:39 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
Can someone add my wiki name (AteDouma) to the Contributors Group page [1]?
Thanks, Ate
[1] https://wiki.apache.org/commons/ContributorsGroup
Could somebody please add
33 matches
Mail list logo
