Le 26/11/2013 08:43, Benedikt Ritter a écrit :
I propose [1] as branching model. It looks very complicated at first, but
I've found it very useful to always have a release ready version of the
code in master.
[1] http://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/
It looks complicated
Hi Damjan,
Le 26/11/2013 06:31, Damjan Jovanovic a écrit :
Firstly, we discussed several options before for the 1.0 release, and
agreed that the contents of trunk would be quickly pushed out as 1.0
with minimal changes (many/most users are using 1.0-SNAPSHOT), and
then the big API redesign
On 25/11/2013 23:30, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 11/25/13, 3:17 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
Are we getting a 2.0.1 for this fix?
GKOP still needs to be fixed to resolve this and the GOP fix needs
the TR part of CTR done carefully ;).
The GOP fix looks OK to me.
Good catch with invalidateObject(). I
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 3:52 AM, Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org wrote:
Le 26/11/2013 08:43, Benedikt Ritter a écrit :
I propose [1] as branching model. It looks very complicated at first, but
I've found it very useful to always have a release ready version of the
code in master.
[1]
2013/11/26 Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 3:52 AM, Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org wrote:
Le 26/11/2013 08:43, Benedikt Ritter a écrit :
I propose [1] as branching model. It looks very complicated at first,
but
I've found it very useful to always have a
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:31 AM, Damjan Jovanovic dam...@apache.orgwrote:
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org wrote:
[Snip]
- The PixelParser classes in
org.apache.commons.imaging.formats.bmp.pixelparsers seems to be used
only internally by
Le 26/11/2013 14:42, Benedikt Ritter a écrit :
What's the point of using git then?
To provide a better collaboration tool for the external contributors,
and thus increasing the external contributions?
Emmanuel Bourg
-
To
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 4:05 AM, Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Damjan,
Le 26/11/2013 06:31, Damjan Jovanovic a écrit :
Firstly, we discussed several options before for the 1.0 release, and
agreed that the contents of trunk would be quickly pushed out as 1.0
with minimal
In the site's Latest Sanselan Release section, this link is broken:
https://people.apache.org/~damjan/imaging-1.0-RC7/release-history.html
It should be https://people.apache.org/~damjan/imaging-1.0-RC7/history.html
Gary
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Damjan Jovanovic dam...@apache.orgwrote:
On Tue, 26 Nov 2013 14:47:09 +0100, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 26/11/2013 14:42, Benedikt Ritter a écrit :
What's the point of using git then?
To provide a better collaboration tool for the external contributors,
and thus increasing the external contributions?
Unless I missed some of the
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:31 AM, Damjan Jovanovic dam...@apache.orgwrote:
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Damjan,
Hi Emmanuel
I reviewed the API, here are my observations:
Thank you.
Firstly, we discussed several options before for the 1.0
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 8:50 AM, Damjan Jovanovic dam...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 4:05 AM, Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org
wrote:
Hi Damjan,
Le 26/11/2013 06:31, Damjan Jovanovic a écrit :
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 8:56 AM, Gilles gil...@harfang.homelinux.orgwrote:
On Tue, 26 Nov 2013 14:47:09 +0100, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 26/11/2013 14:42, Benedikt Ritter a écrit :
What's the point of using git then?
To provide a better collaboration tool for the external contributors,
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:31 AM, Damjan Jovanovic dam...@apache.orgwrote:
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Damjan,
Hi Emmanuel
I reviewed the API, here are my observations:
Thank you.
Firstly, we discussed several options before for the 1.0
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:31 AM, Damjan Jovanovic dam...@apache.orgwrote:
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Damjan,
Hi Emmanuel
I reviewed the API, here are my
On 11/26/13, 4:09 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 25/11/2013 23:30, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 11/25/13, 3:17 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
Are we getting a 2.0.1 for this fix?
GKOP still needs to be fixed to resolve this and the GOP fix needs
the TR part of CTR done carefully ;).
The GOP fix looks OK to me.
Trying hard not to get sucked into the git debate again but I am almost
offended to be offered this ridiculously simplified argument:
For reminder, the argument was that it is quite easy to provide a
contribution with Subversion:
$ svn co URL
$ cd trunk
$ mvn test
$ svn diff
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 6:18 PM, ebo...@apache.org wrote:
Author: ebourg
Date: Tue Nov 26 16:18:58 2013
New Revision: 1545710
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1545710
Log:
Adjust PMD rules
Copied: commons/proper/imaging/trunk/src/conf/pmd-ruleset.xml (from r1545174,
Le 26/11/2013 17:48, Damjan Jovanovic a écrit :
Why are we excluding those? Final variables are a good thing.
Yes but final everywhere is a bit extreme and makes the code too verbose.
Emmanuel Bourg
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org wrote:
Le 26/11/2013 17:48, Damjan Jovanovic a écrit :
Why are we excluding those? Final variables are a good thing.
Yes but final everywhere is a bit extreme and makes the code too verbose.
I disagree, final everywhere is
Le 26/11/2013 19:18, Gary Gregory a écrit :
I disagree, final everywhere is a good thing, please see
http://garygregory.wordpress.com/2013/01/26/the-final-kiss-in-java/
Well, I guess we agree to disagree then :) Final everywhere is absurd
imho, there are many cases where it's useless and
Am 26.11.2013 08:40, schrieb Benedikt Ritter:
2013/11/25 Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de
Any updates here? Also, I would like to hear what others think about
BEANUTILS-454 [1].
Sorry Oliver, I'm busy at the moment. I will not have time much time until
mid december. And then
On 26/11/2013 16:17, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 11/26/13, 4:09 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 25/11/2013 23:30, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 11/25/13, 3:17 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
Are we getting a 2.0.1 for this fix?
GKOP still needs to be fixed to resolve this and the GOP fix needs
the TR part of CTR done
On 11/26/13, 12:40 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 26/11/2013 16:17, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 11/26/13, 4:09 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 25/11/2013 23:30, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 11/25/13, 3:17 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
Are we getting a 2.0.1 for this fix?
GKOP still needs to be fixed to resolve this and
Should we cut a 2.0.1 now just to patch POOL-240?
Phil
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
I would. Release early, release often! :)
Gary
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
Should we cut a 2.0.1 now just to patch POOL-240?
Phil
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org wrote:
Le 26/11/2013 19:18, Gary Gregory a écrit :
I disagree, final everywhere is a good thing, please see
http://garygregory.wordpress.com/2013/01/26/the-final-kiss-in-java/
Well, I guess we agree to disagree then :)
27 matches
Mail list logo
