On 08.11.2014 21:51, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
Le 8 nov. 2014 19:51, Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de a écrit
:
Hi Jochen,
do you intend to position this framework for specific use cases? In
which way is it different or special from other implementations?
Just as one example: In
IMHO this belongs into your global .gitignore.
2014-11-07 13:47 GMT+01:00 ebo...@apache.org:
Repository: commons-math
Updated Branches:
refs/heads/master 596ccd59a - 5584c3060
Ignore the IntelliJ project files
Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-math/repo
Commit:
Hi Gary,
with IBM JDK 6 and 7 I have a failing test:
% =
Tests run: 17, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.023 sec
FAILURE! - in org.apache.commons.codec.binary.StringUtilsTest
INFRA issue is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-8595
2014-11-07 16:17 GMT+01:00 Siegfried Goeschl siegfried.goes...@it20one.com
:
+1
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
On 07 Nov 2014, at 09:47, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
as disucssed, we'd like to create
Le 9 nov. 2014 11:45, Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de a écrit
:
On 08.11.2014 21:51, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
Le 8 nov. 2014 19:51, Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de a
écrit
:
Hi Jochen,
do you intend to position this framework for specific use cases? In
which way
I'm not sure this is correct. We could have a git based sandbox instead of svn.
The Sandbox is one big pile, not individual repos. If commons text graduates,
then it can be moved to its own repo.
Gary
div Original message /divdivFrom: Benedikt Ritter
brit...@apache.org
2014-11-09 13:03 GMT+01:00 Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com:
I'm not sure this is correct. We could have a git based sandbox instead of
svn.
The Sandbox is one big pile, not individual repos. If commons text
graduates, then it can be moved to its own repo.
This is not a good idea, since
Hi all
Gump builds commons-collection's 3.x branch since it is a dependency of
Forrest and the XML Graphics projects that still enjoy using Gump.
After we've switched to using Java8 we found Collections 3.x cannot be
built on Java8 because of some addition to the Map interface.
default boolean
On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 7:12 AM, Benedikt Ritter benerit...@gmail.com
wrote:
2014-11-09 13:03 GMT+01:00 Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com:
I'm not sure this is correct. We could have a git based sandbox instead
of
svn.
The Sandbox is one big pile, not individual repos. If commons text
Fixed in trunk.
2014-11-07 11:39 GMT+01:00 Jan Matèrne (jhm) apa...@materne.de:
All the Lang developers are quite active on the mailing list, so you
can assume we've read your earlier email. However, we are busy people
with lives outside Apache Commons (the horror!), so it may take us a
Hi Stefan,
I've thought about pushing out one last service release for 3.x, since I
expect a lot of people are still using collections 3.x. However, I don't
see myself having the time to do that soon... :-(
br,
Benedikt
2014-11-09 13:41 GMT+01:00 Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org:
Hi all
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/34
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
On 11/09/2014 01:41 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi all
Gump builds commons-collection's 3.x branch since it is a dependency of
Forrest and the XML Graphics projects that still enjoy using Gump.
After we've switched to using Java8 we found Collections 3.x cannot be
built on Java8 because of
On 9 November 2014 12:58, Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/09/2014 01:41 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi all
Gump builds commons-collection's 3.x branch since it is a dependency of
Forrest and the XML Graphics projects that still enjoy using Gump.
After we've switched to
Hi.
I've committed the NTP implementation to the net-commons project many years ago.
The TimeStamp junit test was far from complete so added a few more tests to
cover the bases.
Here's the patch:
Index: src/test/java/org/apache/commons/net/ntp/TimeStampTest.java
Le 09/11/2014 13:43, Gary Gregory a écrit :
How would you know that commons-text is a sandbox component? You would not
if it is git, unless the URL has 'sandbox' in it.
It's a sandbox component because its site will state so. I still think
using a special directory layout or naming scheme for
Fixed in trunk.
Thanks.
Jan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
Le 09/11/2014 12:28, Benedikt Ritter a écrit :
IMHO this belongs into your global .gitignore.
This was just a bogus commit to test the mail notifications. .gitignore
already contains the Eclipse project files and I thought it was fair to
add IntelliJ ones too. Feel free to rollback the changes
This is all reasonable but I do not think this is what our site documents. So
let's make sure we either follow our current charter or document a new system.
Gary
div Original message /divdivFrom: Emmanuel Bourg
ebo...@apache.org /divdivDate:11/09/2014 08:23 (GMT-05:00)
The VOTE to release Commons Codec 1.10-RC2 passes with the following 5
binding votes:
- Luc Maisonobe
- Thomas Neidhart
- Brent Worden
- Jörg Schaible
- Gary Gregory
No other votes where cast.
See http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#commons-pmc
Thank you,
Gary Gregory
--
2014-11-09 14:36 GMT+01:00 Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org:
Le 09/11/2014 12:28, Benedikt Ritter a écrit :
IMHO this belongs into your global .gitignore.
This was just a bogus commit to test the mail notifications. .gitignore
already contains the Eclipse project files and I thought it was
Hi,
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-8595 has already been
resolved... Sorry, I messed that one up. Are you okay if we start using the
commons-text repo and decide how we want to handle git repos for any new
sandbox repos?
Benedikt
2014-11-09 14:53 GMT+01:00 Gary Gregory
22 matches
Mail list logo