On 22 August 2015 at 05:44, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
I've seen commit fly by about moving assemblies to the std location.
I did some of the components I have worked on.
But, in a project like commons-daemon, in the POM, the old locations are
still used.
Am I missing
+1
On 08/22/2015 03:29 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi all
more thann half a year ago I promised to call for a vote for migrating
to git as soon as 1.10 has been released. Well that took longer than
expected :-)
Anyway, here is the vote:
+1 Move to git
-1 Stick with svn
vote will be open for
+1
Gary
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all
more thann half a year ago I promised to call for a vote for migrating
to git as soon as 1.10 has been released. Well that took longer than
expected :-)
Anyway, here is the vote:
+1 Move to git
+1 from me
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 9:29 PM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all
more thann half a year ago I promised to call for a vote for migrating
to git as soon as 1.10 has been released. Well that took longer than
expected :-)
Anyway, here is the vote:
+1 Move to git
+1
Oliver
Am 22.08.2015 um 21:29 schrieb Stefan Bodewig:
Hi all
more thann half a year ago I promised to call for a vote for migrating
to git as soon as 1.10 has been released. Well that took longer than
expected :-)
Anyway, here is the vote:
+1 Move to git
-1 Stick with svn
Dear devs,
Chi-squared test takes degrees of freedom to be one fewer than the sample
count.
https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-math/apidocs/src-html/org/apache/commons/math3/stat/inference/ChiSquareTest.html#line.154
Should be two fewer, right?
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 4:24 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22 August 2015 at 05:44, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
I've seen commit fly by about moving assemblies to the std location.
I did some of the components I have worked on.
But, in a project like commons-daemon,
