> Could this new component be the start of an 'API + Implementation'
> component where we could plugin Java RE and these others?
Sound like an interesting idea.
But, at these projects around 2 (reb4j) and 6 (pattern-builder) years no
activity.
Naomi could be a new start for this idea.
mit
Hi Uwe,
for such small components Apache incubator is sort of overkill - setup can be
daunting and Naomi is unlikely to attract a large community. That’s the reason
why small potential ASF projects are looking for an umbrella project and Apache
Commons is designed to be such an umbrella
Hi Siegfried,
Thanks for your clarification.
It's really commonly use to bypass the incubator for small projects to become
Apache Commons subproject status?
I’m a contributor and not deeply involved to assimilate new projects in ASF.
Thats is, why I vote with zero.
mit freundlichen Grüßen
[x] -0 OK, but…
… on going over Incubator instead.
It gives the chance to grow up a community and re-invite the code and
documentation.
I’m with Benedikt pointing to the rock-star-thing and people behind the ASF.
Why not use the Incubator as described by the ASF[1]?
[1]
Hi Uwe,
I would not say commonly used but this is an option for smaller projects to
find a home - and Apache Commons Sandbox IS the incubator of Apache Commons.
To make the things clearer
* checkout commons-email or commons-exec (Disclaimer - I contributed to both
projects)
* commons-email
On 2015-10-30, Roger Whitcomb wrote:
> Any thoughts? Anyone who might be interested in helping with such a
> project?
TBH, I hate doing GUI stuff. :-)
I can easily see that a GUI for Compress would be nice, though. If
people want to work on a GUI and need help dealing with the Compress
I could possibly come up with some time over the next several weeks to work on
the UI. What technology were you thinking Swing, JavaFX??? I am not really that
familiar with compress so I may need some help with the library itself.
From:"Stefan Bodewig"
Date:Sat, Oct 31,
Hello Phil,
2015-10-30 1:42 GMT+01:00 Phil Steitz :
> This is a VOTE to accept the code discussed in [1] and available for
> review using the git commands below. All are welcome to vote, votes
> from PMC members are binding. Assuming a positive vote, we will
> execute a
On 10/31/15 3:35 AM, Uwe Barthel wrote:
> Hi Siegfried,
>
> Thanks for your clarification.
>
> It's really commonly use to bypass the incubator for small projects to become
> Apache Commons subproject status?
Apache Commons is one project - we don't have subprojects. We have
accepted code
On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 10/31/15 3:35 AM, Uwe Barthel wrote:
> > Hi Siegfried,
> >
> > Thanks for your clarification.
> >
> > It's really commonly use to bypass the incubator for small projects to
> become Apache Commons subproject status?
10 matches
Mail list logo