Re: Whatever happened to commons-io 2.5?

On Mon, 11 Apr 2016, Benson Margulies wrote: A patch: Key added in r13138 Nick - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [COLLECTIONS] [DISCUSS] Possible candidate for inclusion in Commons-Collections: OrderedSet (provides composite-key based ordering of a set of values)

Thanks to all those providing feedback on *OrderedSet*. Based on your comments I've made revisions to the introductory paragraphs in both the README text and the Javadocs , with an eye toward explaining more effectively up front

Re: Whatever happened to commons-io 2.5?

Weird, I'm having trouble applying the patch (my own ineptitude no doubt) Can someone else give it a go SVP? Gary On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 4:10 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > A patch: > > Index: KEYS > === >

Git not suitable for dist repo (was: Whatever happened to commons-io 2.5?)

On 11 April 2016 at 23:44, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 3:41 PM, sebb wrote: > >> On 11 April 2016 at 22:56, Benson Margulies wrote: >> > I'm assuming this code hasn't been moved to git, based on the lack of >> >

Re: Whatever happened to commons-io 2.5?

A patch: Index: KEYS === --- KEYS (revision 13132) +++ KEYS (working copy) @@ -5463,3 +5463,60 @@ 6fqEt2OSFSkWiApqq6lxMRluTiq33bSquTxSomKfQQ== =PImz -END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- + +pub 4096R/98B1CC53 2010-10-23 +uid

Re: Whatever happened to commons-io 2.5?

On 11 April 2016 at 23:57, Benson Margulies wrote: > I volunteered here because I (mis?) remembered that commons had > decided to activate the 'univeral commit bit', so that I would already > have commit access. The dist repo is not the same as the commons repo; they don't

Re: Whatever happened to commons-io 2.5?

I volunteered here because I (mis?) remembered that commons had decided to activate the 'univeral commit bit', so that I would already have commit access. Are you willing to add me to the group? On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 6:44 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016

Re: Whatever happened to commons-io 2.5?

On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 3:41 PM, sebb wrote: > On 11 April 2016 at 22:56, Benson Margulies wrote: > > I'm assuming this code hasn't been moved to git, based on the lack of > > discussion of same on the relevant web page. > > > > AIUI the dist/ tree will

Re: Whatever happened to commons-io 2.5?

On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > So, there's a tag for 2.5-RC3. > > And there are recent commits. > > I propose to move the version on trunk back to 2.5-SNAPSHOT, and then > tee up a 2.5-RC4 release from the current state of trunk, rather than >

Re: Whatever happened to commons-io 2.5?

On 11 April 2016 at 22:56, Benson Margulies wrote: > I'm assuming this code hasn't been moved to git, based on the lack of > discussion of same on the relevant web page. > AIUI the dist/ tree will never be moved to Git because it has so much data in it, and it's not

Re: Whatever happened to commons-io 2.5?

I'm assuming this code hasn't been moved to git, based on the lack of discussion of same on the relevant web page. On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 5:52 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > First Karma issue: > > SendingKEYS > Transmitting file data .svn: E195023: Commit failed

Re: Whatever happened to commons-io 2.5?

First Karma issue: SendingKEYS Transmitting file data .svn: E195023: Commit failed (details follow): svn: E195023: Changing file '/Users/benson/asf/commons/KEYS' is forbidden by the server svn: E175013: Access to '/repos/dist/!svn/txr/13132-b9c/release/commons/KEYS' forbidden svn:

Re: Whatever happened to commons-io 2.5?

So, there's a tag for 2.5-RC3. And there are recent commits. I propose to move the version on trunk back to 2.5-SNAPSHOT, and then tee up a 2.5-RC4 release from the current state of trunk, rather than leave all the changes since the RC waiting for another day. Is there a reason not to do that?

Re: Whatever happened to commons-io 2.5?

There might be a speed bump when it is time to publish to Nexus. That might require PMC karma. Same for copying files for pub/sub. That would be a good thing to doc on the wiki/site. G On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 11/04/2016 18:30, Benson

Re: Whatever happened to commons-io 2.5?

On 11/04/2016 18:30, Benson Margulies wrote: > Well, here we are. I'm willing to help, but you'd have to give me > enough permission. Benson, Willing volunteers are always welcome. As an ASF committer, you already have commit to Commons. As an ASF Member, you know what is expected. Crack on

Re: Whatever happened to commons-io 2.5?

Well, here we are. I'm willing to help, but you'd have to give me enough permission. On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 1:27 PM, wrote: > Sorry, let me re-phrase: I don't think someone with commit rights can be a > RM, I think additional JIRA permissions are required. > > > -

Re: Whatever happened to commons-io 2.5?

Sorry, let me re-phrase: I don't think someone with commit rights can be a RM, I think additional JIRA permissions are required. - Original Message - From: dlmar...@comcast.net To: "Commons Developers List" Sent: Monday, April 11, 2016 1:09:14 PM Subject:

Re: Whatever happened to commons-io 2.5?

I don't think a non-committer can be a RM as I don't believe JIRA permissions have been opened up as well. Please correct me if I am wrong, as I have been waiting a long time for a VFS 2.1 release. - Original Message - From: "Benson Margulies" To: "Commons

Re: Whatever happened to commons-io 2.5?

I was never a member of the commons PMC, or a voted committer, I just had commit access (I thought) due to the decision to give a wide group of people access. On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 12:46 PM, James Carman wrote: > I don't think we take away karma, just membership to

Re: Whatever happened to commons-io 2.5?

I don't think we take away karma, just membership to the PMC. On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 12:45 PM Benson Margulies wrote: > I'm a member emeritus. Can I do it without being voted as something else? > > > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Gary Gregory

Re: Whatever happened to commons-io 2.5?

I'm a member emeritus. Can I do it without being voted as something else? On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > I think we got started and staled a while back. We just need an RM to step > up or step back in. > > Gary > > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 9:30

Re: Whatever happened to commons-io 2.5?

I think we got started and staled a while back. We just need an RM to step up or step back in. Gary On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: > There are bugs marked fixed for years awaiting this release. > >

Whatever happened to commons-io 2.5?

There are bugs marked fixed for years awaiting this release. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [Math] Feature development model: pull request?

Hello. On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 08:04:54 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote: All, I was thinking about this some over the weekend. How many of the contributors (those without commit access to the apache repository), do you think, will be accessing and submitting code via GitHub pull request? I ask because

Re: [Math] Feature development model: pull request?

All, I was thinking about this some over the weekend. How many of the contributors (those without commit access to the apache repository), do you think, will be accessing and submitting code via GitHub pull request? I ask because GitHub offers a template mechanism for pull requests.

Re: [jira] [Apache Infrastructure] Grant write access to Apache Commons git repositories to all ASF committers

Hi Benedikt, On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 6:31 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hi, > > this issue has been fixed. All ASF committers should now be able to write > to our git repositories. Sergio, can you give it a try and commit something > to the commons-lang git repo? > Tested