Re: [Result][VFS] Switch to Git

On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Bernd Eckenfels > wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> There was no objection to switching VFS project to Git as the primary >> source control. Here are the people

Re: [VOTE] Apache Commons BeanUtils 1.9.3 RC1

Am 03.06.2016 um 22:16 schrieb Gary Gregory: > On Jun 3, 2016 12:53 PM, "Oliver Heger" > wrote: >> >> Build works fine with Java 1.6 on Windows 10. Artifacts and site look > good. >> >> The site cannot be built with Java 8, and the release notes are missing >>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Commons BeanUtils 1.9.3 RC1

On Jun 3, 2016 12:53 PM, "Oliver Heger" wrote: > > Build works fine with Java 1.6 on Windows 10. Artifacts and site look good. > > The site cannot be built with Java 8, and the release notes are missing > BEANUTILS-477, but this is not blocking. > > I ran the tests

Re: [VOTE] Apache Commons BeanUtils 1.9.3 RC1

Build works fine with Java 1.6 on Windows 10. Artifacts and site look good. The site cannot be built with Java 8, and the release notes are missing BEANUTILS-477, but this is not blocking. I ran the tests for [configuration] with the new jar and got a single test failure which seems to be caused

Re: [Result][VFS] Switch to Git

On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > Hello, > > There was no objection to switching VFS project to Git as the primary > source control. Here are the people participated (I also vote +1): > > Bernd Eckenfels > Gary Gregory > Dave Brosius > Woonsan Ko >

[Result][VFS] Switch to Git

Hello, There was no objection to switching VFS project to Git as the primary source control. Here are the people participated (I also vote +1): Bernd Eckenfels Gary Gregory Dave Brosius Woonsan Ko Josh Elser Ralph Goers Jochen Wiedmann Christopher How to proceed? Open an Infra ticket? Gruss

Re: [bcel] Deprecated InstructionConstants

Yeah, that rings a bell. Gary On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 6:43 AM, Matt Sicker wrote: > Isn't it the clirr plugin that's failing with bcel? > > On 2 June 2016 at 17:07, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > > > Gary Gregory schrieb am Fr., 3. Juni

Re: [ALL] About binary compatibility

On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 11:36 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > I don't understand what's wrong with semantic versioning and keeping > the same maven coordinates. No sane person should be using RELEASE or > LATEST. The real problem is, IMO, not the versioning scheme, but the

Re: [ALL] About binary compatibility

On Thu, 02 Jun 2016 21:35:45 +, Benedikt Ritter wrote: Emmanuel Bourg schrieb am Do., 2. Juni 2016 um 23:26 Uhr: Le 2/06/2016 à 22:42, Benedikt Ritter a écrit : > - since our components are depended upon by a lot of projects, we need to > take special care regarding

Re: [bcel] Deprecated InstructionConstants

Isn't it the clirr plugin that's failing with bcel? On 2 June 2016 at 17:07, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Gary Gregory schrieb am Fr., 3. Juni 2016 um > 00:06 Uhr: > > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Jörg Schaible > > wrote: > >

Re: [BCEL] Binary compatibility - approaches to solving the interface changes

Le 3/06/2016 à 11:13, sebb a écrit : > I found the Clirr report I did on BCEL: > > http://home.apache.org/~sebb/BCEL/clirr-report.html > > This compares BCEL trunk with 5.2. > [The 5.2 code was shaded to align the package names.] > > As can be seen, the main changes are additions to the Visitor

[BCEL] Binary compatibility - approaches to solving the interface changes

I found the Clirr report I did on BCEL: http://home.apache.org/~sebb/BCEL/clirr-report.html This compares BCEL trunk with 5.2. [The 5.2 code was shaded to align the package names.] As can be seen, the main changes are additions to the Visitor interface. There are several approaches to fix

Re: [Poll][VFS] Switch to Git

ping? Gary On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 3:46 PM, James Carman wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 4:43 PM Bernd Eckenfels > wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I would like to be able to use Git with the Apache Commons VFS repo. As > > we agreed upon

Re: [all] Automatic site update

On 2 June 2016 at 23:15, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > >> Emmanuel Bourg schrieb am Do., 2. Juni 2016 um >> 23:39 Uhr: >> >> > Hi all, >> > >> > A part of the release process is to

Re: [ALL] About binary compatibility

On 2 June 2016 at 21:42, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hi, > > we do seem to have different opinions when it comes to binary compatibility > and how it should be handled. Usually we would say "this should be decided > on a component basis". However this discussion is coming up

Re: [ALL] About binary compatibility

Hi Benson, Benson Margulies wrote: > Just to cite a fact: > > If you write: > > > > > ... > x > ... > > You will get x. Even if transitive dependencies ask for x+10. I only > learned this recently. Yes, but you dropped the significant part here:

AW: [all] Automatic site update

> > A part of the release process is to update the web site. I wonder if > > this could be simplified with a Jenkins job watching for the release > > tags and building/uploading the new site automatically. That would > > make one less thing to think about when releasing new versions. I > > suspect

RE: US Export classification & ECCN registration for encryption in commons?

Thanks Stian, Dapeng and folks! For Commons Crypto, do we still have to wait for other process to finish or we now can go forward with the first release process? Regards, Haifeng -Original Message- From: Stian Soiland-Reyes [mailto:st...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2016 10:36