Re: [DBCP] Working on 2.2 RC1

Matt, Did you massage Maven just so? Please see https://www.apache.org/dev/publishing-maven-artifacts.html#settings Also, when I do a mvn deploy, I have to do -Dgpg.passphrase=MY_PASSWORD Gary On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 6:14 PM, Matt Sicker wrote: > Got this error when

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: commons-dbcp #5

Jenkins must have some busted setups :-( Log a ticket with infra? Gary On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Matt Sicker wrote: > Oh wow, we just had this same error in log4j a little while ago. > > On 28 July 2016 at 20:11, Apache Jenkins Server > >

Re: [dbcp] Migrate to git?

Fine with me but not critical. Gary On Jul 28, 2016 5:38 PM, "Matt Sicker" wrote: > Can we have this project migrated next after 2.2 is released? I forgot how > painful using svn is after years of git. ;) > > -- > Matt Sicker >

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: commons-dbcp #5

Oh wow, we just had this same error in log4j a little while ago. On 28 July 2016 at 20:11, Apache Jenkins Server wrote: > See > > Changes: > > [mattsicker] Update version to snapshot in trunk > >

Re: [DBCP] Working on 2.2 RC1

Got this error when executing mvn deploy (tried both the command from dbcp-RC.sh along with the command given on the docs page: "mvn deploy -Prelease -Duser.name=mattsicker -Pjava-1.7"): [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-deploy-plugin:2.8.2:deploy (default-deploy) on

Build failed in Jenkins: commons-dbcp #5

See Changes: [mattsicker] Update version to snapshot in trunk -- Started by an SCM change [EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables. Building remotely on H10 (docker Ubuntu ubuntu yahoo-not-h2)

[dbcp] Migrate to git?

Can we have this project migrated next after 2.2 is released? I forgot how painful using svn is after years of git. ;) -- Matt Sicker

Re: [DBCP] Working on 2.2 RC1

Oh wait, I just tried typing in "2.3" and it let me create a new version. False alarm! On 28 July 2016 at 19:14, Matt Sicker wrote: > I have jira karma, but adding versions to a project requires project admin > permissions or something like that. > > On 28 July 2016 at 18:28,

Re: svn commit: r1754208 - in /commons/proper/dbcp/tags/DBCP_2_2_RC1: ./ doc/ src/

Would it be ok to just manually update the pom after doing an svn cp? Subversion does allow updating tags. Otherwise, I could try to get it right in RC2. On 27 July 2016 at 10:44, Matt Sicker wrote: > There's a commons.release.version in the pom that looks like it's manually >

Re: [DBCP] Working on 2.2 RC1

I have jira karma, but adding versions to a project requires project admin permissions or something like that. On 28 July 2016 at 18:28, Gary Gregory wrote: > Hi Matt: > > I thought you had Jira karma now? Is that not the case? > > Gary > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 4:18

Re: [DBCP] Working on 2.2 RC1

Hi Matt: I thought you had Jira karma now? Is that not the case? Gary On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Matt Sicker wrote: > I also need version 2.2.1 or 2.3 added to jira so I can update fix versions > properly. Looks like version 2.1.2 can be deleted from jira, too, as

Re: [DBCP] Working on 2.2 RC1

I also need version 2.2.1 or 2.3 added to jira so I can update fix versions properly. Looks like version 2.1.2 can be deleted from jira, too, as we're going straight to 2.2. On 28 July 2016 at 12:31, Gary Gregory wrote: > YW, good luck! > > Gary > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2016

Re: [VOTE] Release CRYPTO 1.0.0 based on RC1

+1 On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 5:25 AM, Sun, Dapeng wrote: > Hi all, > > > > Apache Commons CRYPTO was established at May 9, 2016, There are presently > numbers of resolved issues fix in CRYPTO. We also fix the legal issue. > > > > Apache Commons CRYPTO 1.0.0 is available for

Re: [VOTE] Release CRYPTO 1.0.0 based on RC1

Hi, I am building crypto with my compiler zoo on Gentoo Linux with OpenSSL 1.02h installed. Even compiling with Java 9 works, tests fail only because of a missing jce. Running the tests I get always those two warnings: %< == Running

[CANCELED][VOTE] Release Configuration 2.1 based on RC1

This vote is canceled because of a problem with the build under Java 1.6. I will create another RC soon. Thanks for the reviews. Oliver Am 24.07.2016 um 22:31 schrieb Oliver Heger: > Hi all, > > there have been a number of bug fixes and also some new features for > [configuration] since

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.1 based on RC1

Hi Benedikt, Am 28.07.2016 um 08:30 schrieb Benedikt Ritter: > Hello Oliver, > > Oliver Heger schrieb am Mi., 27. Juli 2016 > um 21:30 Uhr: > >> Thanks for the reviews so far. >> >> I tested with the Java 1.6 compatibility profile, and here a mvn clean >> install

Re: [DBCP] Working on 2.2 RC1

YW, good luck! Gary On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 7:54 AM, Matt Sicker wrote: > That looks like the error I had. I'll try uploading the artifacts to > staging again tonight. If that works, I can finish making RC1. Thanks for > the assistance! > > On 27 July 2016 at 22:08, Gary

Re: [DBCP] Working on 2.2 RC1

That looks like the error I had. I'll try uploading the artifacts to staging again tonight. If that works, I can finish making RC1. Thanks for the assistance! On 27 July 2016 at 22:08, Gary Gregory wrote: > Matt, > > I've added you as a Commons committer. > > Gary > > On

[LANG] LANG-1252 - NumberUtils.isNumber and NumberUtils.createNumber resolve inconsistently

In short, I’m trying to generalize LANG-1060, LANG-1040, LANG-1038, and LANG-992 with a single issue that actually hits all the bases here with NumberUtils.isNumber. Bug (1): System.out.println(lang.math.NumberUtils.isNumber(“+2”)); > false while

[GitHub] commons-bcel pull request #10: BCEL-276 LocalVariableTypeTable is not update...

GitHub user KyongSik-Yoon opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/commons-bcel/pull/10 BCEL-276 LocalVariableTypeTable is not updated when use MethodGen. If a method for BCI have at least one generic type of argument JVM throw java.lang.ClassFormatError due to not updated

[GitHub] commons-bcel pull request #9: BCEL-277 Resolve constant to a string represen...

GitHub user KyongSik-Yoon opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/commons-bcel/pull/9 BCEL-277 Resolve constant to a string representation occur NoSuchElementException in case CONSTANT_NameAndType constant. A method that constantToString of ConstantPool class always occur

[GitHub] commons-collections pull request #17: small improvements for collectionUtils

GitHub user izebit opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/commons-collections/pull/17 small improvements for collectionUtils You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/izebit/commons-collections trunk

Re: [All] Please don't commit while repos are moving

On 2016-07-28, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hello Jochen, > Jochen Wiedmann schrieb am Do., 28. Juli 2016 > um 11:06 Uhr: >> Hi, >> please don't commit to repositories, while they are moving to Git. >> AFAIK, this currently covers [io], and [fileupload], but possibly >>

Re: [All] Please don't commit while repos are moving

On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > because the old source tree in SVN has to be moved to a new location. I failed to do that for fileupload and asked Sebb, and Stefan, to do that for me, 5 minutes ago. (They did that for other components in the

Re: [All] Please don't commit while repos are moving

Hello Jochen, Jochen Wiedmann schrieb am Do., 28. Juli 2016 um 11:06 Uhr: > Hi, > > please don't commit to repositories, while they are moving to Git. > AFAIK, this currently covers [io], and [fileupload], but possibly > others as well. > > We might interfer with

[All] Please don't commit while repos are moving

Hi, please don't commit to repositories, while they are moving to Git. AFAIK, this currently covers [io], and [fileupload], but possibly others as well. We might interfer with Infra otherwise. And, as you possibly are aware: They are understaffed, and slow, anyways. Thanks, Jochen -- The

Re: [BCEL] Potential IP problem at GitHub

On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 9:14 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > I need some advice on how to handle this pull request at GitHub [1]. It > looks like it has been copied without notice from the ASM project. The > files added contain a license header mentioning INRIA, France Telecom.

[BCEL] Potential IP problem at GitHub

Hello, I need some advice on how to handle this pull request at GitHub [1]. It looks like it has been copied without notice from the ASM project. The files added contain a license header mentioning INRIA, France Telecom. For now I've just asked the contributor to sign an ICLA. But that is not

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.1 based on RC1

Dennis Kieselhorst schrieb am Do., 28. Juli 2016 um 08:56 Uhr: > > > Any proposals which version of the checkstyle plugin would be > > compatible? Or why does the checkstyle plugin becomes active for a mvn > > clean install at all? > > > Sorry, I simply changed it to latest

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.1 based on RC1

> Any proposals which version of the checkstyle plugin would be > compatible? Or why does the checkstyle plugin becomes active for a mvn > clean install at all? > Sorry, I simply changed it to latest version without noticing that Java 7 is now required. According to

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.1 based on RC1

Hello Oliver, Oliver Heger schrieb am Mi., 27. Juli 2016 um 21:30 Uhr: > Thanks for the reviews so far. > > I tested with the Java 1.6 compatibility profile, and here a mvn clean > install is successful (using Maven 3.3.9). > do you use the profile defined in