[collections] a list class with fast indexOf(Object) and contains(Object)

On the Apache POI project (Java library to read and write Microsoft Office files), we are using a List to store the fonts (XSSFFont) used in an Excel workbook's style table (XSSFWorkbook.getStylesSource() -> StyleTable) [1]. To avoid bloating the style table with duplicate fonts, we check if the

Re: [rng] Cleanup of "topic" branches

I've deleted these branches. Best regards, Artem Barger. On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 11:13 PM, Dave Brosius wrote: > i'm not sure what the value of dead branch labels hanging around is. They > just clutter things up and confuse new people coming it as to

Re: [VOTE][RC1] Release Commons Rng 1.0

On Sun, 11 Sep 2016 11:21:20 -0700, Gary Gregory wrote: Same comment for the Javadoc title IMO "Rng" -> "RNG" Kudos on getting high coverage as reported by JaCoCo. Thanks! Tools like this https://coveralls.io/github/apache/commons-rng create addiction. ;-) Gilles Gary On Sun, Sep 11,

Re: [VOTE][RC1] Release Commons Rng 1.0

On Sun, 11 Sep 2016 11:19:18 -0700, Gary Gregory wrote: The site should be as it would be for 1.0: https://home.apache.org/~erans/commons-rng-1.0-RC1-site/index.html *"There isn't any release yet.* Work is currently performed actively towards release 1.0: See our issue-tracking system.

Re: [rng] Cleanup of "topic" branches

i'm not sure what the value of dead branch labels hanging around is. They just clutter things up and confuse new people coming it as to what to use. I'm +1 for deleting them. On 09/11/2016 02:26 PM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Gary Gregory

Re: Apache Commons Report Due

That sounds like it sums it up to date. On 11 September 2016 at 10:45, Gary Gregory wrote: > Is there anything specific you'd like noted WRT Commons Math and Commons > RNG? > > Otherwise I'll keep it simple: The Commons community has decided to bring > forth and maintain

Re: [rng] Cleanup of "topic" branches

On Sun, 11 Sep 2016 20:26:03 +0200, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: Once a branch has been merged into master, I think it is OK to remove it. Otherwise, IMO it's on a case by case basis: Does the author of the branch need

Re: [rng] Cleanup of "topic" branches

On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > Once a branch has been merged into master, I think it is OK to remove it. > Otherwise, IMO it's on a case by case basis: Does the author of the branch > need it? Whats the point? I'd rather see us create something

Re: [VOTE][RC1] Release Commons Rng 1.0

Same comment for the Javadoc title IMO "Rng" -> "RNG" Kudos on getting high coverage as reported by JaCoCo. Gary On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > The site should be as it would be for 1.0: https://home.apache.org/~ >

Re: [VOTE][RC1] Release Commons Rng 1.0

The site should be as it would be for 1.0: https://home.apache.org/~erans/commons-rng-1.0-RC1-site/index.html *"There isn't any release yet.* Work is currently performed actively towards release 1.0: See our issue-tracking system. " That's not right.

Re: [ALL] JDK 9 Version String

I ran into that while taking a look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1197 http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/223 specifies the new versioning string schema, but I was not sure how add this to the current implementation (without breaking anything). Am 11.09.2016 um 18:31 schrieb

Re: [LANG] Towards 3.5

On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hello again, > > Benedikt Ritter schrieb am So., 11. Sep. 2016 um > 15:44 Uhr: > > > Hi, > > > > please share your thoughts about LANG-1134 [1]. I argue that it is not > > ready to be shipped with

Re: [rng] Cleanup of "topic" branches

+1 for removal. > On Sep 11, 2016, at 11:32 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Once a branch has been merged into master, I think it is OK to remove it. > Otherwise, IMO it's on a case by case basis: Does the author of the branch > need it? > > Gary > > On Sun, Sep 11, 2016

Re: [VOTE][RC1] Release Commons Rng 1.0

Build works fine with Java 1.6 and 1.8 on Windows 10. Artifacts and site look good. +1 Oliver Am 11.09.2016 um 16:55 schrieb Gilles: > Hi. > > This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons Rng 1.0 (from RC1). > > Tag name: > RNG_1_0_RC1 (signature can be checked from git using 'git tag -v')

Re: [LANG] Towards 3.5

Hello again, Benedikt Ritter schrieb am So., 11. Sep. 2016 um 15:44 Uhr: > Hi, > > please share your thoughts about LANG-1134 [1]. I argue that it is not > ready to be shipped with 3.5. > Furthermore we need to fix LANG-1264 [2] IMHO. Benedikt [2]

Re: [ALL] JDK 9 Version String

Hello, I've created LANG-1264 [1] to address this for Commons Lang's JavaVersion enum. Regards, Benedikt [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1264 Gary Gregory schrieb am Fr., 15. Juli 2016 um 17:34 Uhr: > Thank you for the pointers. > > Gary > > On Jul 15,

Re: [rng] Cleanup of "topic" branches

Yes, these can branches can be removed, actually I can take care of it. Отправлено с iPhone > 11 сент. 2016 г., в 18:32, Gary Gregory написал(а): > > Once a branch has been merged into master, I think it is OK to remove it. > Otherwise, IMO it's on a case by case basis:

Re: [VOTE][RC1] Release Commons Rng 1.0

+1 from me Отправлено с iPhone > 11 сент. 2016 г., в 17:55, Gilles написал(а): > > Hi. > > This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons Rng 1.0 (from RC1). > > Tag name: > RNG_1_0_RC1 (signature can be checked from git using 'git tag -v') > > Tag URL: > >

Re: [LANG] Towards 3.5

RERO! Gary On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 6:44 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hi, > > please share your thoughts about LANG-1134 [1]. I argue that it is not > ready to be shipped with 3.5. > > Regards, > Benedikt > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1134 > > Benedikt

Re: Apache Commons Report Due

Is there anything specific you'd like noted WRT Commons Math and Commons RNG? Otherwise I'll keep it simple: The Commons community has decided to bring forth and maintain a new component, Commons RNG, out of the larger Commons Math code base, which is has seen no activity in the last quarter. The

Re: Apache Commons Report Due

On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 5:18 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > Commons FileUpload 1.3.3 > We have a bit of a mess here: - Commons FileUpload-1.3.2 was released on Wed May 25 2016 and was recorded in the _previous_ Commons report. - The download area shows 1.3.2:

Re: [rng] Cleanup of "topic" branches

Once a branch has been merged into master, I think it is OK to remove it. Otherwise, IMO it's on a case by case basis: Does the author of the branch need it? Gary On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 4:23 AM, Gilles wrote: > Hi. > > If they are not used anymore, can we remove

Re: [VOTE][RC1] Release Commons Rng 1.0

+1 > On Sep 11, 2016, at 10:55 AM, Gilles wrote: > > Hi. > > This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons Rng 1.0 (from RC1). > > Tag name: > RNG_1_0_RC1 (signature can be checked from git using 'git tag -v') > > Tag URL: > >

[VOTE][RC1] Release Commons Rng 1.0

Hi. This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons Rng 1.0 (from RC1). Tag name: RNG_1_0_RC1 (signature can be checked from git using 'git tag -v') Tag URL: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=commons-rng.git;a=commit;h=f8d23082607b9f2c7be7f489eb09627722440ee5 Commit ID the tag

Jenkins build is back to normal : Commons-Lang #30

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Jenkins build is back to normal : Commons-Lang » Apache Commons Lang #30

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [LANG] Towards 3.5

Hi, please share your thoughts about LANG-1134 [1]. I argue that it is not ready to be shipped with 3.5. Regards, Benedikt [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1134 Benedikt Ritter schrieb am Sa., 10. Sep. 2016 um 20:59 Uhr: > Hi, > > I'm going to start

Re: [math] Creating a class of number theory tools

Hi Benedikt. On Sun, 11 Sep 2016 12:32:36 +, Benedikt Ritter wrote: Gilles schrieb am So., 11. Sep. 2016 um 13:33 Uhr: Hello. On Sat, 10 Sep 2016 19:18:32 -0600, Shane S wrote: > Hi Gilles, > > Thank you for your response. These methods are used primarily

Build failed in Jenkins: Commons-Lang #29

See Changes: [beneritter] The behavior for empty arrays is documented in the @return JavaDoc tag [beneritter] Revert "[LANG-1201] Add a TimeUnit-like classes for base 2 and base 10 [beneritter] Correct issue number for LANG-1120 in

Build failed in Jenkins: Commons-Lang » Apache Commons Lang #29

See Changes: [beneritter] The behavior for empty arrays is documented in the @return JavaDoc tag [beneritter] Revert "[LANG-1201] Add a TimeUnit-like classes for base 2 and base 10 [beneritter] Correct

Re: [LANG] Towards 3.5

Hello Pascal, Pascal Schumacher schrieb am So., 11. Sep. 2016 um 10:31 Uhr: > Great news. :) Thanks a lot! > > What about the these two issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1201 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1227 > > The code was

Re: [math] Creating a class of number theory tools

Gilles schrieb am So., 11. Sep. 2016 um 13:33 Uhr: > Hello. > > On Sat, 10 Sep 2016 19:18:32 -0600, Shane S wrote: > > Hi Gilles, > > > > Thank you for your response. These methods are used primarily in > > computational number theory applications. I myself came

Re: Apache Commons Report Due

Commons FileUpload 1.3.3 On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 8:40 PM, Matt Sicker wrote: > * The commons math evolution. > * Commons crypto 1.0 > > I don't think anything else too exciting has happened other than normal > releases. > > On 10 September 2016 at 13:21, Gary Gregory

[rng] Cleanup of "topic" branches

Hi. If they are not used anymore, can we remove the following branches: RNG-7 RNG-7a checkstyle ? Thanks, Gilles - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [math] Creating a class of number theory tools

Hello. On Sat, 10 Sep 2016 19:18:32 -0600, Shane S wrote: Hi Gilles, Thank you for your response. These methods are used primarily in computational number theory applications. I myself came across the need for these algorithms when studying and implementing traditional and proposed variants

Re: [LANG] Towards 3.5

Great news. :) Thanks a lot! What about the these two issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1201 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1227 The code was checked in, but in the discussion people disagreed wether it was ready to ship. Am 10.09.2016 um 20:59 schrieb Benedikt

Could you please checkout this PR?

Hi fellows, I've addressed all the comments regarding this PR: https://github.com/apache/commons-io/pull/17 Could you please kindly merge it or let me know if there's anything else remaining that I should address before it can be merged? -- Best regards, Behrang Saeedzadeh