Re: [lang] LANG-1144: Multiple calls of org.apache.commons.lang3.concurrent.LazyInitializer.initialize() are possible

Am 24.10.2016 um 22:35 schrieb Oliver Heger: Minor nit: As the field is now a constant, it should - according to the Sun coding conventions - be named in uppercase: NO_INIT. I thought that only applied to public constants, but I was wrong. I have changed the field name. Thanks, Pascal

Re: [lang] LANG-1144: Multiple calls of org.apache.commons.lang3.concurrent.LazyInitializer.initialize() are possible

Am 23.10.2016 um 22:18 schrieb pascalschumac...@apache.org: > Repository: commons-lang > Updated Branches: > refs/heads/master 96c8ea2fb -> dc53e49b4 > > > LANG-1144: Multiple calls of > org.apache.commons.lang3.concurrent.LazyInitializer.initialize() are possible > > minimal clean-up > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 2.0-beta-2 based on RC1

2016-10-24 21:03 GMT+02:00 Thomas Vandahl : > Hi Romain, > > On 24.10.16 12:44, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > +1, thanks Thomas > > > > Side note: the tck module has been deactivated cause of packaging=pom but > > ran it manually and all tests passed so not an issue for the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 2.0-beta-2 based on RC1

Hi Romain, On 24.10.16 12:44, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > +1, thanks Thomas > > Side note: the tck module has been deactivated cause of packaging=pom but > ran it manually and all tests passed so not an issue for the release since > we don't care of this artifact distribution, just here as a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 2.0-beta-2 based on RC1

On 21.10.16 19:42, Thomas Vandahl wrote: > [X] +1 Release these artifacts > [ ] +0 OK, but... > [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix... > [ ] -1 I oppose this release because... My own vote. Bye, Thomas - To unsubscribe,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 2.0-beta-2 based on RC1

+1 LieGrue, strub > Am 24.10.2016 um 14:36 schrieb Johannes Weberhofer > : > > > > Am 21.10.2016 um 19:42 schrieb Thomas Vandahl: >> I would like to beta-release the [jcs] component. >> >> Apache Commons JCS 2.0-beta-2 RC1 is available for review at: >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 2.0-beta-2 based on RC1

On 24 October 2016 at 07:34, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hello Thomas > > Thomas Vandahl schrieb am So., 23. Okt. 2016 um 12:16 Uhr: > >> Hi Benedikt, >> >> On 23.10.16 10:51, Benedikt Ritter wrote: >> > Hello Thomas, >> > >> > The build works with Java 8 and

Re: [lang] To Java 7

I don't think we need to keep arguing this, when we discussed this last time we said we'll do an intermediate Java 7-version - if there are too many screams (I suspect almost none) then we can be more careful before moving to Java 8 afterwards, which would give the biggest benefit (and need more

Re: [math] IIR filter library (Butterworth,Bessel,...)

On 24/10/16 14:26, Gilles wrote: Hi. [...] The next step, then (I think) is that as a committer, I can submit a proposal to get this idea established in the Incubator as a podling for a commons sub-project. I suggest to use the sandbox, within "Commons". Stupid queston: where do I find

Re: [lang] To Java 7

Keeping open a maintenance branch for 3.5 sounds like a good idea. If it really does end up taking over a year before a 3.6 release needs to be made, then Java 6 may be a moot point by then. Either way, it sounds like migrating to Java 7 for a 3.6 release isn't a bad idea unless it turns out there

Re: [lang] To Java 7

Le 23/10/2016 à 09:30, Gary Gregory a écrit : > Thoughts? If this means doing only trivial internal code changes with no benefit to the end users then I don't think it's worth it. I would either stick to Java 6 or go to Java 8 and offer some real new stuff. Emmanuel Bourg

Re: [math] IIR filter library (Butterworth,Bessel,...)

Hi. [...] The next step, then (I think) is that as a committer, I can submit a proposal to get this idea established in the Incubator as a podling for a commons sub-project. I suggest to use the sandbox, within "Commons". Thanks! The one technical question I have is whether it is okay

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 2.0-beta-2 based on RC1

Am 21.10.2016 um 19:42 schrieb Thomas Vandahl: I would like to beta-release the [jcs] component. Apache Commons JCS 2.0-beta-2 RC1 is available for review at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/jcs/ (r16621). Maven artifacts are at:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 2.0-beta-2 based on RC1

+1, thanks Thomas Side note: the tck module has been deactivated cause of packaging=pom but ran it manually and all tests passed so not an issue for the release since we don't care of this artifact distribution, just here as a runner. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau

Re: [lang] To Java 7

On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 3:42 AM, sebb wrote: > It seems that Java 6 is still supported until Dec 2018 if the user > purchases Extended Support. Given that a) We don't enforce users to upgrade. b) The decision to move to Java 7 doesn't prevent us from opening a

Re: [math] IIR filter library (Butterworth,Bessel,...)

P.S.: Just tested it with 3.0.0. There the Laguerre Root function is not yet implemented. For 3.0.0 we needed to exclude the Bessel filter. That works from 3.1.0. On 24/10/16 10:25, Eric Barnhill wrote: > Hi Bernd, sounds like we agree on basically everything there is to do. > > >> I've spent

Re: [math] IIR filter library (Butterworth,Bessel,...)

Hi Eric, On 24/10/16 10:25, Eric Barnhill wrote: > Hi Bernd, sounds like we agree on basically everything there is to do. > > >> I've spent the weekend adding maven support to the IIRJ library. So now >> a simple "mvn install" does the job. Also done the testing properly with >> "mvn test" which

Re: [math] IIR filter library (Butterworth,Bessel,...)

Opps. Link doesn't work. Do you mean the OCTAVE/MATLAB "filter" command? If you limit that to FIR coefficients then that's equivalent literally to a convolution operation which we already have. (that FIR filtering is the convolution function I have to de-bunk every year in my DSP class because in

Re: [math] IIR filter library (Butterworth,Bessel,...)

Hi Bernd, sounds like we agree on basically everything there is to do. > I've spent the weekend adding maven support to the IIRJ library. So now > a simple "mvn install" does the job. Also done the testing properly with > "mvn test" which generates all the different kinds of impulse responses >

Re: [math] IIR filter library (Butterworth,Bessel,...)

Am Samstag, den 22.10.2016, 23:25 +0100 schrieb Bernd Porr: (...) > I'm not too crazy about proper FIR filters in JAVA because even in > C++  > they are just too slow and one would need to write them as JNI calls > to  > C to make them run fast enough (for example a 50Hz notch for ECG at > 1kHz 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 2.0-beta-2 based on RC1

Hello Thomas Thomas Vandahl schrieb am So., 23. Okt. 2016 um 12:16 Uhr: > Hi Benedikt, > > On 23.10.16 10:51, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > > Hello Thomas, > > > > The build works with Java 8 and Maven 3.3.9. > > > > But the md5 and SHA1 files are missing in the dist area. > > > >