Re: [all] Clirr or japicmp - does either work for anybody?

I am not sure Clirr is maintained at all. G On Dec 20, 2016 8:43 AM, "Matt Benson" wrote: > I used japicmp with the last [weaver] release. Also it seems more actively > maintained than Clirr so it would probably be easier to get a fix in. > > Matt > > On Tue, Dec 20, 2016

AW: interested in contributing

Starting points are also - open issues (see JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/BrowseProjects.jspa#10260) - something you missed for yourself - something another misses (see userlist) Jan > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bode...@apache.org] > Gesendet:

Re: [all] Clirr or japicmp - does either work for anybody?

I used japicmp with the last [weaver] release. Also it seems more actively maintained than Clirr so it would probably be easier to get a fix in. Matt On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > Hi > > I'm trying to figure out how to get a report on API changes

Re: Fwd: [lang] remove commons-io test dependency

it is not more verbose Am 20.12.2016 um 15:15 schrieb Gary Gregory: Why make the test code more verbose than it has to be? Gary -- Forwarded message -- From: Date: Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 1:01 AM Subject: [lang] remove commons-io test dependency To:

[all] Clirr or japicmp - does either work for anybody?

Hi I'm trying to figure out how to get a report on API changes in compress. If I enable Clirr the site build dies with a NullPointerException (I vaguely recall it might work if I used Java7, so that might by my last resort). If I enable japicmp it dies because it thinks it has found binary

Re: interested in contributing

Welcome Shan On 2016-12-20, Padmashantha Rajapakshe wrote: > I have 10+ years of Java experience, so would like to contribute for > common project at the beginner level. This sounds great. > really appreciate if guide me with initial setup. Commons isn't a whole but rather a group of

Re: Fwd: [lang] remove commons-io test dependency

Le 20/12/2016 à 15:15, Gary Gregory a écrit : > Why make the test code more verbose than it has to be? +1, extra dependencies for the tests isn't an issue. Emmanuel Bourg - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Fwd: [lang] remove commons-io test dependency

Why make the test code more verbose than it has to be? Gary -- Forwarded message -- From: Date: Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 1:01 AM Subject: [lang] remove commons-io test dependency To: comm...@commons.apache.org Repository: commons-lang Updated Branches:

interested in contributing

Hi, I have 10+ years of Java experience, so would like to contribute for common project at the beginner level. really appreciate if guide me with initial setup. thanks, Shan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: