Re: RDF commons testing

On 28 January 2017 at 21:08, Claude Warren wrote: > I see that RDF Commons is listed as a set of interfaces to be implemented > on top of various RDF implementations. I also see that there are abstract > tests for the interfaces. > > I would like to suggest that RDF commons

Re: [Numbers] Further work on NUMBERS-6

Hi. On Sat, 28 Jan 2017 14:38:21 -0500, Raymond DeCampo wrote: [...] Now, for the contents of the "fraction" module. (1) My main current concern is the formatting-related classes; as for "complex", I think that 1. formatting (and I/O) is out of scope, and 2. the implementation were

Re: StringUtils.isEmpty() family of methods on Objects

Agree with Benedikt here, if it's only the .toString() that is important, then "string" should appear in the method name; otherwise we need to do Commons Collections style handling of anything that can be empty or not. To support null (which isn't really "empty" but missing), perhaps just have

Re: StringUtils.isEmpty() family of methods on Objects

Like Bene, this feels a little off to me. Just for argument's sake, let's look at: Optional.ofNullable(foo).map(Object::toString).filter(StringUtils::isNotBlank).isPresent(); Assuming you're on Java 8, of course. It's a bit long, but not horrible. What about, in a Java 8-compatible version of

Re: [Numbers] Further work on NUMBERS-6 (Was: [5/5] Add maven module for fractions [...])

On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 10:48 AM, Gilles wrote: > On Sat, 28 Jan 2017 09:00:52 -0500, Raymond DeCampo wrote: > >> Thanks for the feedback Gilles. >> > > Thanks for helping with the project! > > I generally prefer to work in smaller increments so that suits me fine.

Re: StringUtils.isEmpty() family of methods on Objects

If you look at the link Matt provided, that handles arrays and collection, but not Object.toString() Gary On Jan 28, 2017 1:13 AM, "Benedikt Ritter" wrote: > Am 28.01.2017 um 02:53 schrieb Gary Gregory : > > The simplest examples I have on hand are

[Numbers] Further work on NUMBERS-6 (Was: [5/5] Add maven module for fractions [...])

On Sat, 28 Jan 2017 09:00:52 -0500, Raymond DeCampo wrote: Thanks for the feedback Gilles. Thanks for helping with the project! I generally prefer to work in smaller increments so that suits me fine. Re working on an outdated branch, I'm not sure I completely understand what you want

Re: [5/5] commons-numbers git commit: Add maven module for fractions package from commons-math Resolves pull request #4

Thanks for the feedback Gilles. I generally prefer to work in smaller increments so that suits me fine. Re working on an outdated branch, I'm not sure I completely understand what you want plus I am not a git expert by any stretch. Are you suggesting I back out the changes on the multimodule

Re: [5/5] commons-numbers git commit: Add maven module for fractions package from commons-math Resolves pull request #4

Hi Ray. On Sat, 28 Jan 2017 12:44:27 -, raydeca...@apache.org wrote: Add maven module for fractions package from commons-math Resolves pull request #4 Whenever possible, we aim at small commits (unless they are all of the same kind, and it is obvious what is being done repeatedly). In

RDF commons testing

I see that RDF Commons is listed as a set of interfaces to be implemented on top of various RDF implementations. I also see that there are abstract tests for the interfaces. I would like to suggest that RDF commons look at using Junit Contract tests (https://github.com/Claudenw/junit-contracts)

Re: StringUtils.isEmpty() family of methods on Objects

> Am 28.01.2017 um 02:53 schrieb Gary Gregory : > > The simplest examples I have on hand are instances of Path and URI which > can be built with an empty string. I want to know if these are "empty". For > the app I am now on for example, a Path or null and "" should be