Re: [DISCUSS] Scala at Commons

2017-02-12 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hi, I’m very happy to see to much positive feedback on this idea! Let’s wait a little longer to give others a chance to chime in. We can then discuss the details (e.g. which build tool to use) Regards, Benedikt > Am 12.02.2017 um 22:34 schrieb Dave Brosius : > > +1 to

Re: [DAEMON] Feedback on my improvements and new features

2017-02-12 Thread Gary Gregory
Hi All: This components needs some attention indeed and I am glad it has some traction out there. I use it at work and for customers and I've not run into serious issues but I know there are some bug fix requests pending. For me, I would be more concerned with addressing the bug backlog than new

Re: [VOTE] Commons-net 3.6 based on RC1

2017-02-12 Thread Gary Gregory
+1 >From src zip: ASC, MD5, SHA1 OK. RAT check OK CLIRR check OK Building 'mvn clean site' OK Using: Apache Maven 3.0.5 (r01de14724cdef164cd33c7c8c2fe155faf9602da; 2013-02-19 05:51:28-0800) Maven home: C:\Java\apache-maven-3.0.5 Java version: 1.7.0_80, vendor: Oracle Corporation Java home:

Re: [VALIDATOR] Release 1.5.2?

2017-02-12 Thread sebb
On 12 February 2017 at 18:01, sebb wrote: > On 12 February 2017 at 15:54, Benedikt Ritter wrote: >> Hello Sebb, >> >> Are you about to create an RC for 1.5.2? If not, please let me know when >> you’re finished with your latest changes. I’d like to push out

Re: [DISCUSS] Scala at Commons

2017-02-12 Thread Dave Brosius
+1 to adding scala (or other) language support. I'd just rather stay away from mixing languages in projects. On 02/12/2017 03:36 PM, Oliver Heger wrote: As we already host some C-code in Commons, I see no reason to reject Scala or other JVM languages. I have done some experiments with Scala

Re: [DISCUSS] Scala at Commons

2017-02-12 Thread Matt Sicker
We're using Maven in Log4j 2 for our Scala API and it seems to work fine, but it's not exactly a large submodule (just a few classes). This is the plugin we're using: . As for using SBT, I have one friend who loves it, and I have a couple other friends

Re: [DISCUSS] Scala at Commons

2017-02-12 Thread Oliver Heger
As we already host some C-code in Commons, I see no reason to reject Scala or other JVM languages. I have done some experiments with Scala myself and am very impressed by this language. I might even have a small library which could become a component. One question: Which build tool would we use?

Re: Add StringUtils#isAllEmpty(CharSequence...) and isAllBlank(CharSequence...)?

2017-02-12 Thread Bruno P. Kinoshita
Hello, I'm 0 on that one. Agree that users can simply use the negation operator, and also that it can be handy to have a method to avoid typos or simplify their code. Cheers Bruno - Original Message - From: Pascal Schumacher To: Commons Developers List

Re: [DISCUSS] Scala at Commons

2017-02-12 Thread Bruno P. Kinoshita
+1 Started learning Scala some time ago, but there is still a lot to learn. So definitely willing to help with small issues in Scala projects at Commons. Cheers Bruno - Original Message - From: Benedikt Ritter To: Commons Developers List

Re: [DISCUSS] Scala at Commons

2017-02-12 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2017-02-12, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Commons mission has always been to provide a home for common _Java_ > libraries. Since my personal and professional interests are slowly > shifting from Java towards Scala, I’m looking for ways to contribute > to Open Source with Scala. For this reason I’d

Re: [DISCUSS] Scala at Commons

2017-02-12 Thread Rob Tompkins
> On Feb 12, 2017, at 10:52 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > > Hello, > > Commons mission has always been to provide a home for common _Java_ libraries. It's seemed slightly odd to me that there weren't more supported languages represented in Commons. Scala seems like a

Re: [VALIDATOR] Release 1.5.2?

2017-02-12 Thread sebb
On 12 February 2017 at 15:54, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hello Sebb, > > Are you about to create an RC for 1.5.2? If not, please let me know when > you’re finished with your latest changes. I’d like to push out a new release > soon. I'm working towards getting it ready for a

Re: [DISCUSS] Scala at Commons

2017-02-12 Thread Gary Gregory
I'm all for it. Gary On Feb 12, 2017 7:53 AM, "Benedikt Ritter" wrote: > Hello, > > Commons mission has always been to provide a home for common _Java_ > libraries. Since my personal and professional interests are slowly shifting > from Java towards Scala, I’m looking for

Add StringUtils#isAllEmpty(CharSequence...) and isAllBlank(CharSequence...)?

2017-02-12 Thread Pascal Schumacher
Hello everybody, a few months ago StringUtils#isAnyNotEmpty(CharSequence...) and StringUtils#isAnyNotBlank(CharSequence...) were added (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1270). Now there is a pull request which purposes adding the inverse of these methods named

[VALIDATOR] Release 1.5.2?

2017-02-12 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hello Sebb, Are you about to create an RC for 1.5.2? If not, please let me know when you’re finished with your latest changes. I’d like to push out a new release soon. Thank you! Benedikt - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

[DISCUSS] Scala at Commons

2017-02-12 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hello, Commons mission has always been to provide a home for common _Java_ libraries. Since my personal and professional interests are slowly shifting from Java towards Scala, I’m looking for ways to contribute to Open Source with Scala. For this reason I’d like to discuss whether Commons

Re: Immutable builder pattern for parsers?

2017-02-12 Thread Andy Seaborne
On 09/02/17 04:02, Peter Ansell wrote: Not all fluent configuration APIs are "builder patterns". By that I mean that you can have a "return this" convention for the builder with mutable fields without it building or cloning new objects. A builder pattern is characterised by a terminal method