Re: [VOTE][LAZY] Migrate Apache Commons DbUtils to git

+1 On Fri, Jun 30, 2017, 4:33 AM Carl Hall wrote: > Hi, > > I’d like to call a vote by lazy consensus for migrating the code base of > Apache Commons DbUtils to git. > > This vote is successful if nobody raises objections within the next 72 > hours, i.e. before July 02,

Re: [VOTE][LAZY] Migrate Apache Commons DbUtils to git

+1 Gary On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Carl Hall wrote: > Hi, > > I’d like to call a vote by lazy consensus for migrating the code base of > Apache Commons DbUtils to git. > > This vote is successful if nobody raises objections within the next 72 > hours, i.e. before

Re: [VOTE][LAZY] Migrate Apache Commons DbUtils to git

> On Jun 29, 2017, at 7:03 PM, Carl Hall wrote: > > Hi, > > I’d like to call a vote by lazy consensus for migrating the code base of > Apache Commons DbUtils to git. > > This vote is successful if nobody raises objections within the next 72 > hours, i.e. before July 02,

[VOTE][LAZY] Migrate Apache Commons DbUtils to git

Hi, I’d like to call a vote by lazy consensus for migrating the code base of Apache Commons DbUtils to git. This vote is successful if nobody raises objections within the next 72 hours, i.e. before July 02, 2017 23:00 UTC. Regards, Carl

Re: Commons sub project for parallel method execution

Hi All, Further building on the code generation approach, I have committed some changes which will now allow clients to specify methods as if calling them directly. The client API is highly simplified now and is almost equivalent to direct invocation. Argument types and return types are all

[Daemon] needs love (and a release)

Hi All, We have not had any work done on Daemon in a while. Does anyone here have any cycles to show this quite useful component some love? It seems Mr. Turk -- it's once shepherd (?) -- is long gone from these parts. Gary

[All] GitBox

Hi All, I noticed the following announced in our 2017 fiscal news roundup: New "Gitbox" service launched to allow communities to host their read/write Git repositories on GitHub; Should we try this with one of our components? Gary

Re: [text] - using RandomStringGenerator for alpha numeric

On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 5:31 PM, Gilles wrote: > On Thu, 29 Jun 2017 11:52:30 +, Amey Jadiye wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> I'd apritiate if someone can provide valuable inputs / suggestions / >> improvements. >> >> I think this will be value added to

Re: [text] - using RandomStringGenerator for alpha numeric

On Thu, 29 Jun 2017 11:52:30 +, Amey Jadiye wrote: Hi All, I'd apritiate if someone can provide valuable inputs / suggestions / improvements. I think this will be value added to RandomStringGenerator. Regards, Amey On Tue, Jun 27, 2017, 11:40 PM Amey Jadiye wrote:

Re: [text] - using RandomStringGenerator for alpha numeric

Hi All, I'd apritiate if someone can provide valuable inputs / suggestions / improvements. I think this will be value added to RandomStringGenerator. Regards, Amey On Tue, Jun 27, 2017, 11:40 PM Amey Jadiye wrote: > Hi All, > > With below reference user asked whether he

Re: [DISCUSS] Do we need a vote for moving components to git?

On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 9:21 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > do we still need a vote for moving components to git? We have done this so > often that I think we could change the process to a simply mail announcing > intents to move a component. No harm done by starting a lazy