Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 2.2.1 (roll 2)

2017-10-24 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Ok, will try this week-end. Thanks for the feedback. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn 2017-10-25 6:42 GMT+02:00 Gary Gregory : > IMO, you should redo the tag and rewrite the VOTE email following the > template in

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 2.2.1 (roll 2)

2017-10-24 Thread Gary Gregory
IMO, you should redo the tag and rewrite the VOTE email following the template in http://commons.apache.org/releases/prepare.html Gary On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:40 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hmm, > > Read that page but the answer is probably hidden in the commons

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 2.2.1 (roll 2)

2017-10-24 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hmm, Read that page but the answer is probably hidden in the commons parent - rc property? - cause it is not written how a rc version ends in a not rc version for binaries on nexus with the release plugin. Will check which magic we do here later this week but anyway shouldnt block the release IMO

Re: [RDF] Commons release?

2017-10-24 Thread Gary Gregory
Maybe what is in master is enough? Gary On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:31 PM, Bruno P. Kinoshita < brunodepau...@yahoo.com.br.invalid> wrote: > Not so familiar, more familiar with Jena, but they are related. > If nobody else volunteers, I can try to spend a weekend triaging issues > and seeing if I

Re: [RDF] Commons release?

2017-10-24 Thread Bruno P. Kinoshita
Not so familiar, more familiar with Jena, but they are related. If nobody else volunteers, I can try to spend a weekend triaging issues and seeing if I can catch up with the changes since the last release and volunteer to cut a new release. CheersBruno From: Gary Gregory

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 2.2.1 (roll 2)

2017-10-24 Thread Gary Gregory
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 9:28 PM, kenneth mcfarland < kennethpmcfarl...@gmail.com> wrote: > Gary, I can't help but say great work on all of these releases. #praise > Thank you Kenneth. Gary > > On Oct 24, 2017 8:24 PM, "Gary Gregory" wrote: > > > Our process documented

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 2.2.1 (roll 2)

2017-10-24 Thread Matt Sicker
On 22 October 2017 at 16:17, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > So i just copy the mvn release tag? Sounds quite useless since the tag is > done no? > A release candidate is supposed to match the eventual release at some point; that's why it's a "candidate". Making a copy of an

Re: [LOGGING] Problems updating to lastest commons parent

2017-10-24 Thread Gary Gregory
Remove the version specifier for build-helper-maven-plugin, this will pick up the version from the parent POM, which I locally updated from 34 to 42. Then you'll run into some other error due to how this old build wants to name jars. Gary On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 2:30 AM, Benedikt Ritter

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 2.2.1 (roll 2)

2017-10-24 Thread kenneth mcfarland
Gary, I can't help but say great work on all of these releases. #praise On Oct 24, 2017 8:24 PM, "Gary Gregory" wrote: > Our process documented here http://commons.apache.org/ > releases/prepare.html > makes it pretty clear that the RC tag should be labeled as such and

Re: [RDF] Commons release?

2017-10-24 Thread Gary Gregory
Hopefully someone who is familiar with Commons RDF is reading this... Gary On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Aaron Coburn wrote: > Hello, > > I wanted to check in on the status of a 0.4.0 release of Commons RDF. It > seems that all of the open PRs have been merged. Any idea

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 2.2.1 (roll 2)

2017-10-24 Thread Gary Gregory
Our process documented here http://commons.apache.org/releases/prepare.html makes it pretty clear that the RC tag should be labeled as such and that a tag like "commons-jcs-2.2.1" should only be created after a VOTE passes. Gary On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 3:17 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau

[VOTE] Release Apache Commons Pool 2.4.3 based on RC1

2017-10-24 Thread Gary Gregory
We have fixed a few bugs since Apache Commons Pool 2.4.2 was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons Pool 2.4.3. Apache Commons Pool 2.4.3 RC1 is available for review here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/pool at revision: 22662 Get it like this: svn co

[GitHub] commons-cli pull request #21: Add module-info

2017-10-24 Thread michaelsavich
GitHub user michaelsavich opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/commons-cli/pull/21 Add module-info This should modularize commons-cli. We may have to do another commit to get maven to build modularized jars by default, but as of this build javac works perfectly. You

Re: [collections] release 4.2

2017-10-24 Thread Gary Gregory
As long as it is on your to-do list, I can focus on other tasks. Thank you! Gary On Oct 24, 2017 13:29, "Benedikt Ritter" wrote: > I‘m planning to work on it soon but I can‘t give you an ETA at the moment. > > Regards, > Benedikt > > Gary Gregory

Re: [collections] release 4.2

2017-10-24 Thread Benedikt Ritter
I‘m planning to work on it soon but I can‘t give you an ETA at the moment. Regards, Benedikt Gary Gregory schrieb am Di. 24. Okt. 2017 um 00:01: > We've had a couple of false starts here. Is the RM ready to fire off an RC? > > Gary >

Re: [pool] Java 7 and release

2017-10-24 Thread sebb
On 24 October 2017 at 15:22, Gary Gregory wrote: > I think I will: > - release pool > - update to Java 7 Might be sensible to add a note to the pom that Tomcat 8 needs Java 7+. This means that Pool 2 cannot be updated beyond Java 7 without affecting Tomcat 8. > It seems

Re: [pool] Java 7 and release

2017-10-24 Thread Gary Gregory
I think I will: - release pool - update to Java 7 It seems cleaner that way. Gary On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 8:04 AM, Matt Sicker wrote: > On 24 October 2017 at 06:44, Mark Thomas wrote: > > > On 24/10/17 05:56, Matt Sicker wrote: > > > Go for it! Though

Re: [pool] Java 7 and release

2017-10-24 Thread Matt Sicker
On 24 October 2017 at 06:44, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 24/10/17 05:56, Matt Sicker wrote: > > Go for it! Though perhaps some quick feedback from Tomcat would be good > > since they're the primary Apache project that uses the library. > > I assume we are talking about Pool 2.x. >

Re: [pool] Java 7 and release

2017-10-24 Thread Mark Thomas
On 24/10/17 05:56, Matt Sicker wrote: > Go for it! Though perhaps some quick feedback from Tomcat would be good > since they're the primary Apache project that uses the library. I assume we are talking about Pool 2.x. Pool 2.x is used by Tomcat 8 onwards and Tomcat 8 has a requirement of Java 7

Re: [pool] Java 7 and release

2017-10-24 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 12:30 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > Or the other way around. Release and update to Java 7... Sounds like a better plan to me. After two years, it could be necessary to provide another maintenance release at any time. Jochen -- The next time you