>They are not necessarily exclusive options.
>I mean: (intending on) good design is necessary but, if achieved,
>it doesn't imply that logging is never necessary.
+1 agreed, regardless of the decision here.
>I'd like to recall that logging is a tool primarily for _users_:
>it helps them see ho
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Apache Commons Team is pleased to announce the release of Apache
Commons Compress 1.16.
Apache Commons Compress software defines an API for working with
compression and archive formats. These include: bzip2, gzip, pack200,
lzma, xz, Snappy, tradi
On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 10:04 PM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 10:00 PM, Dave Brosius wrote:
>
>> Given the lack of impetus around doing anything more grand with
>> beanutils, can we put out the current state of beanutils as 2.0 so we can
>> get rid of the old commons-collections
On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 10:00 PM, Dave Brosius wrote:
> Given the lack of impetus around doing anything more grand with beanutils,
> can we put out the current state of beanutils as 2.0 so we can get rid of
> the old commons-collections dependency, and then if folks would like, we
> can think abou
Given the lack of impetus around doing anything more grand with
beanutils, can we put out the current state of beanutils as 2.0 so we
can get rid of the old commons-collections dependency, and then if folks
would like, we can think about moving on with what's on the alternative
branch in the fu
> On Feb 5, 2018, at 3:05 PM, Gilles wrote:
>
> On Mon, 5 Feb 2018 14:27:53 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>>> On Feb 5, 2018, at 2:22 PM, Gilles wrote:
>>>
On Mon, 5 Feb 2018 14:17:18 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote:
Which should be the template multi-module project? They all have
subtl
On Mon, 5 Feb 2018 14:27:53 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote:
On Feb 5, 2018, at 2:22 PM, Gilles
wrote:
On Mon, 5 Feb 2018 14:17:18 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote:
Which should be the template multi-module project? They all have
subtle differences that lead to different nuances to the build.
Which diff
Hi all
with +1s by
Gary Gregory
Oliver Heger
Stefan Bodewig
and no other votes the votes has passed. I'll proceed with publishing
the artifacts and give the mirrors a few hours time before announcing
the release.
Many thanks to those who took the time to evaluate the release
Stefan
-
> On Feb 5, 2018, at 2:22 PM, Gilles wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 5 Feb 2018 14:17:18 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>> Which should be the template multi-module project? They all have
>> subtle differences that lead to different nuances to the build.
>
> Which differences did you spot?
Nothing of any par
On Mon, 5 Feb 2018 14:17:18 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote:
Which should be the template multi-module project? They all have
subtle differences that lead to different nuances to the build.
Which differences did you spot?
Gilles
I
figure we pick one and make that the standard multi-module build
pa
Which should be the template multi-module project? They all have subtle
differences that lead to different nuances to the build. I figure we pick one
and make that the standard multi-module build paradigm and fit the others into
it.
-Rob
Hi.
I noticed that commons-parent pom has this:
${scmBranch}@r${buildNumber}; ${maven.build.timestamp}
and it is used as `Implementation-build:` jar manifest entry.
Is it a standard or a tradition? Is it for svn only? What about git?
-
On Mon, 5 Feb 2018 04:41:20 -0800, Otto Fowler wrote:
Maybe Debug should be an interface ( perhaps with the current class
as the
default implementation ) and be passed in optionally?
On February 5, 2018 at 07:21:11, Bruno P. Kinoshita (
brunodepau...@yahoo.com.br.invalid) wrote:
Hello,
If me
Maybe Debug should be an interface ( perhaps with the current class as the
default implementation ) and be passed in optionally?
On February 5, 2018 at 07:21:11, Bruno P. Kinoshita (
brunodepau...@yahoo.com.br.invalid) wrote:
Hello,
If memory serves me well, some time ago we had a discussion ar
Hello,
If memory serves me well, some time ago we had a discussion around sanselan &
commons-imaging 1.0. One of the issues with commons-imaging 1.0 was the Debug
class.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMAGING-154
I finished the pull request, but Gilles raised an important point, about
Github user kinow commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-imaging/pull/35
`changes.xml` updated. Last commit contains the word-trick to close the
pull request. Once merged, everything should be correct, just need to update
JIRA.
---
---
GitHub user kinow opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/commons-imaging/pull/35
IMAGING-154 Removed Debug class
Removed the `Debug` and `ImageDump` classes. Also removed methods with the
`verbose` parameter, as well as any `System.out.println`'s. Tried to keep the
change
17 matches
Mail list logo
