[lang] Merge PR for new StopWatch (StackWatch) from LANG-1373

Hi, See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1373 for the ticket history, and https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/311 for the pull request review & discussion. I'm happy with the current design. It builds on top of the existing StopWatch, giving users the ability to have

Re: [RNG] Towards v1.1

> On Feb 20, 2018, at 6:28 PM, Gilles wrote: > >> On Tue, 20 Feb 2018 10:22:11 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote: >> Re. Towards 1.1 I’m not sure I’ll be able to get the [release-plugin] >> working with rng before hand because I’d like to make some pom >> changes. > >

Re: [RNG] Towards v1.1

On Tue, 20 Feb 2018 07:41:51 -0700, Gary Gregory wrote: I do not think so. I like to download a zip that has all I need, including examples I know where presumably built to match the main code. OK. Note that the target is not the same: main code -> 1.6 examples -> 1.8 or 1.9 Gilles Gary

Re: [RNG] Towards v1.1

On Tue, 20 Feb 2018 10:22:11 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote: Re. Towards 1.1 I’m not sure I’ll be able to get the [release-plugin] working with rng before hand because I’d like to make some pom changes. RNG's POM? But, I don’t want to get in your way of releasing 1.1. Perhaps better create a

Re: [RDF] Fluent parser API?

On Tue, 20 Feb 2018 16:49:23 +, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > ajs6f and others who like talking about immutability and fluent APIs: > I'll come back to the alternative ParserBuilder interface > which guides the client caller step by step straight into a parsed

[RDF] Fluent parser API?

ajs6f and others who like talking about immutability and fluent APIs: Stuck on a train with no WiFi I plundered a bit further with the idea of a fluent Parser (& writer) API for Commons RDF. I have committed this idea to the fluent-parser branch for now:

Re: commons-csv git commit: CSV-216: Avoid Arrays.copyOf()

On Fri, 16 Feb 2018 20:11:11 +0100, Gilles wrote: > Bottom-line: Don't use clone except to copy arrays. > So I'd rephrase my comment on the commit: let "clone()" in place > but with the comment that it's the only acceptable use of it. OK, I've added such comments :)

Re: [RNG] Towards v1.1

Re. Towards 1.1 I’m not sure I’ll be able to get the [release-plugin] working with rng before hand because I’d like to make some pom changes. But, I don’t want to get in your way of releasing 1.1. So I’ll do that after you send it up and out. -Rob > On Feb 20, 2018, at 9:41 AM, Gary Gregory

Re: [RNG] Towards v1.1

I do not think so. I like to download a zip that has all I need, including examples I know where presumably built to match the main code. Gary On Feb 20, 2018 07:06, "Gilles" wrote: Hi. Does it make sense to exclude the commons-rng-examples module from the

Save the date: ApacheCon North America, September 24-27 in Montréal

Dear Apache Enthusiast, (You’re receiving this message because you’re subscribed to a user@ or dev@ list of one or more Apache Software Foundation projects.) We’re pleased to announce the upcoming ApacheCon [1] in Montréal, September 24-27. This event is all about you — the Apache project

Re: [RNG] Towards v1.1

Hi. Does it make sense to exclude the commons-rng-examples module from the distribution? Gilles On Thu, 15 Feb 2018 20:45:41 +0100, Gilles wrote: On Thu, 08 Feb 2018 17:18:44 +0100, Gilles wrote: Ping? ... On Fri, 26 Jan 2018 16:06:10 +0100, Gilles wrote: Hello. I propose to release

Re: [VFS] HttpClient version 3, 4 and 5

On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 9:21 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > - Create a new package org.apache.commons.vfs2.provider.http4, or > - Break BC on the classes in org.apache.commons.vfs2.provider.http Break BC, and do it right: Don't expose HttpClient in the API. Emphasis being on

[IO] Missing tag for 2.6? (was: Fw: [jira] [Created] (IO-569) Incorrect documentation for cloning repository)

Hello, I couldn't find the tag 2.6 [1], as reported in IO-569 below. Maybe we skipped some step from "4 Create SCM Tag for the Final Release" in [2] ? Not too sure if that's really OK just to create manually the tag now, or if I've missed something here. Any thoughts? Cheers Bruno [1]