Re: [All] japicmp (parent 46)

2018-04-21 Thread Rob Tompkins
> On Apr 21, 2018, at 7:18 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > >> On Sat, Apr 21, 2018, 16:29 Gilles wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 21 Apr 2018 14:15:08 +, Gary Gregory wrote: >>> I see commons-geometry-core below. >>> >>> Gary >>> On Sat, Apr

Re: [All] japicmp (parent 46)

2018-04-21 Thread Gary Gregory
On Sat, Apr 21, 2018, 16:29 Gilles wrote: > On Sat, 21 Apr 2018 14:15:08 +, Gary Gregory wrote: > > I see commons-geometry-core below. > > > > Gary > > > > On Sat, Apr 21, 2018, 06:22 Rob Tompkins wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> > On Apr 19, 2018,

Re: [All] japicmp (parent 46)

2018-04-21 Thread Gilles
On Sat, 21 Apr 2018 14:15:08 +, Gary Gregory wrote: I see commons-geometry-core below. Gary On Sat, Apr 21, 2018, 06:22 Rob Tompkins wrote: > On Apr 19, 2018, at 7:42 PM, Gilles wrote: > > For what it's worth: > > $ mvn site

Re: Discuss [VOTE] Migrate Commons Weaver to Git

2018-04-21 Thread Matt Sicker
I opened an infra ticket [1] to find out our options here. My preferred option would be to migrate all of Commons over to gitbox for consistency. [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-16413 On 21 April 2018 at 12:23, Matt Benson wrote: > On Sat, Apr 21, 2018,

Re: Discuss [VOTE] Migrate Commons Weaver to Git

2018-04-21 Thread Matt Benson
On Sat, Apr 21, 2018, 11:20 AM Rob Tompkins wrote: > > > > On Apr 21, 2018, at 10:20 AM, Oliver Heger > wrote: > > > > > > > > Am 20.04.2018 um 19:08 schrieb Matt Sicker: > >> Wow, us "legacy" projects really need to keep up to date with these >

Re: Discuss [VOTE] Migrate Commons Weaver to Git

2018-04-21 Thread Rob Tompkins
> On Apr 21, 2018, at 10:20 AM, Oliver Heger > wrote: > > > > Am 20.04.2018 um 19:08 schrieb Matt Sicker: >> Wow, us "legacy" projects really need to keep up to date with these >> requirements. GitBox, no CMS (I think we're using svnpubsub everywhere, but >>

Re: Discuss [VOTE] Migrate Commons Weaver to Git

2018-04-21 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 20.04.2018 um 19:08 schrieb Matt Sicker: > Wow, us "legacy" projects really need to keep up to date with these > requirements. GitBox, no CMS (I think we're using svnpubsub everywhere, but > this could also use gitpubsub with an asf-site branch), etc. Would it reduce overhead if we converted

Re: [All] japicmp (parent 46)

2018-04-21 Thread Gary Gregory
I see commons-geometry-core below. Gary On Sat, Apr 21, 2018, 06:22 Rob Tompkins wrote: > > > > On Apr 19, 2018, at 7:42 PM, Gilles > wrote: > > > > For what it's worth: > > > > $ mvn site site:stage > > Curious what project you’re working in?

Re: [All] japicmp (parent 46)

2018-04-21 Thread Rob Tompkins
> On Apr 19, 2018, at 7:42 PM, Gilles wrote: > > For what it's worth: > > $ mvn site site:stage Curious what project you’re working in? I would bet that it’s probably one that’s multimode as japicmp doesn’t do well with pom modules. > > * succeeds with CP 43