Note: Commons Collections 4.2 is out and git master is now set to Java 8.
Gary
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 12:04 PM Gary Gregory
wrote:
> That is not what we normally consider BC at Commons but I understand your
> point.
>
> Gary
>
> On Sun, Jul 15, 2018, 11:45 Claude Warren wrote:
>
>> It would
Unless someone else (on the PMC) beasts me to it, my plan is to create a
release candidate (RC) soon and then the community can vote. Please see
https://commons.apache.org/releases/index.html.
Gary
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 3:59 PM Aleksander Ściborek <
aleksanderscibo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes
Yes I think it's a good idea :)
But it should be voted or something like that? I l'm asking because I
joined yo this community recently so I don´t know to much yet ;)
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018, 23:52 Gary Gregory wrote:
> Not a new branch, the plan I am in mind:
> - Release 3.8 now pretty much as is
The Apache Commons DBCP team is pleased to announce the release of Apache
Apache Commons DBCP 2.5.0-SNAPSHOT.
Apache Commons DBCP software implements Database Connection Pooling.
This is a minor release, including bug fixes and enhancements and requires
Java 8 to support JDBC 4.2.
Changes in
Not a new branch, the plan I am in mind:
- Release 3.8 now pretty much as is out of git master. This is for Java 7.
If need be we can create a 3.8.x branch for additional patches for Java 7.
- Update git master to require Java 8
- Let people provide PRs.
Gary
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 3:35 PM
You mean creating a new branch on git for new Lang release or what, because
I'm not sure if I understand ?
On 15 July 2018 at 23:26, Pascal Schumacher
wrote:
> Am 15.07.2018 um 22:09 schrieb Gary Gregory:
>
>> Let's cut a Lang release and then update to Java 8.
>>
>
> +1
>
>
>
>What about introducing our own state listener interface? The original
>interface from the beans package was used just for convenience because
>it already existed. But it would of course be possible to have a simple
>functional interface to notify listeners about state changes.
Hmmm, that's an
Am 16.07.2018 um 13:40 schrieb Bruno P. Kinoshita:
Saw some recent activity around lang 3.8, and remembered about this issue, and
then looked for this thread.
Gilles' point is really good! Here's the Java 9 docs with the deprecation
warning, copied below as well
On 16 July 2018 at 15:42, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 8:00 AM Rob Tompkins wrote:
>
>> Just wanted to make note of this. But, automating validation is mildly
>> sketchy IMO.
>>
>
> There is a checklist called "Things To Look For When Inspecting A Release
> Candidate" on
Am 16.07.2018 um 13:40 schrieb Bruno P. Kinoshita:
> Saw some recent activity around lang 3.8, and remembered about this issue,
> and then looked for this thread.
>
> Gilles' point is really good! Here's the Java 9 docs with the deprecation
> warning, copied below as well
>
Am 16.07.2018 um 02:17 schrieb Gary Gregory:
> Thank you for your review; more below.
> '
> On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 12:20 PM Oliver Heger
> wrote:
>
>> Build works fine on Windows 10 with Java 8. Artifacts and site look good.
>>
>> +1
>>
>> I noticed the following things:
>> * In the first
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 8:00 AM Rob Tompkins wrote:
> Just wanted to make note of this. But, automating validation is mildly
> sketchy IMO.
>
There is a checklist called "Things To Look For When Inspecting A Release
Candidate" on https://commons.apache.org/releases/prepare.html
but it is
If one can successfully automate validation, then surely it becomes
redundant, as the checks can presumably be added to the RC production?
On 16 July 2018 at 15:00, Rob Tompkins wrote:
> Just wanted to make note of this. But, automating validation is mildly
> sketchy IMO.
>
> -Rob
>
Just wanted to make note of this. But, automating validation is mildly sketchy
IMO.
-Rob
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> On Jul 13, 2018, at 7:40 PM, Gilles wrote:
>
> On Fri, 13 Jul 2018 15:07:30 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>> I just pulled your user guide changes in to my 1.1 branch. Will that
>> cover it?
>
> It's the one occurrence which I found of the moved module;
> but, as I wrote, I still can't make
Saw some recent activity around lang 3.8, and remembered about this issue, and
then looked for this thread.
Gilles' point is really good! Here's the Java 9 docs with the deprecation
warning, copied below as well
https://docs.oracle.com/javase/9/docs/api/index.html?java/util/Observable.html
16 matches
Mail list logo
