Re: [lang] preparing for 3.8

2018-08-14 Thread Bruno P. Kinoshita
Sounds good to me. I feel like trying RM'ing some myself once I find time, just to play with this new release plug-in and compare with what we had to do before (which would be a great post for blogs.apache.org btw)! ThanksBruno From: Rob Tompkins To: Commons Developers List Sent:

Re: [lang] preparing for 3.8

2018-08-14 Thread Rob Tompkins
> On Aug 14, 2018, at 7:13 AM, Bruno P. Kinoshita > wrote: > > Hi Rob! > > Thanks for RM'ing lang 3.8! > > > I think it would be good to fix for LANG-1339, as we get closer to supporting > Java 9 someday... > > I believe the summary from the last comments in the discussion in the

Re: [imaging] IMAGING-154 remove Debug class

2018-08-14 Thread Matt Sicker
Depends on how complicated your log messages are. Parameterized logging and automatic level-checking guards aren't available, but it's workable. If you use Java 8 at least, they added a lambda version of log messages so you don't even need to worry about string formatting having a performance

Re: [lang] preparing for 3.8

2018-08-14 Thread Pascal Schumacher
Am 14.08.2018 um 14:15 schrieb Gary Gregory: Not a blocker IMO. We can release 3.8 and work on this for 3.9. +1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [rng] In JIRA unable to create 1.2 release for tagging issues

2018-08-14 Thread Rob Tompkins
> On Aug 14, 2018, at 11:04 AM, Gilles wrote: > > On Tue, 14 Aug 2018 09:43:45 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote: >> It looks like RNG’s Jira space has a different permission profile >> than [LANG] in which I could create a new version if I wanted. Does >> anyone know what might be going on here? >

Re: [rng] In JIRA unable to create 1.2 release for tagging issues

2018-08-14 Thread Gilles
On Tue, 14 Aug 2018 09:43:45 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote: It looks like RNG’s Jira space has a different permission profile than [LANG] in which I could create a new version if I wanted. Does anyone know what might be going on here? No. [I filled in the new state.] Best regards, Gilles -Rob

Re: [all] Sebb's bulk JIRA issue transition don't send email no longer works

2018-08-14 Thread Gilles
On Tue, 14 Aug 2018 15:07:15 +0100, sebb wrote: No idea, please ask Infra On 14 August 2018 at 14:50, Rob Tompkins wrote: @Sebb with this new version of Jira, I couldn’t find your checkbox to not send email notifications on the bulk transition. Do you know if it still exists? -Rob It's

Re: [VOTE] Release Compress 1.18 based on RC1

2018-08-14 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2018-08-14, Rob Tompkins wrote: >> On Aug 14, 2018, at 12:26 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: >>> On 2018-08-14, Rob Tompkins wrote: >>> Must fix during artifact promotion: >>> (1) Signature files contain more than the correct signatures (note the >>> contents below): >> This is the well known

[jira] bulk issue transition don't send email (was: [all] Sebb's bulk JIRA issue transition don't send email no longer works)

2018-08-14 Thread Rob Tompkins
Hello infra, It looks like in JIRA version 7.6.3 we lost the ability to toggle off sending emails for an update because of a change in the way admin permissions are granted. Its not entirely clear to me if you can grant this level of permissions to project admins, but here’s a discussion on

Re: [all] Sebb's bulk JIRA issue transition don't send email no longer works

2018-08-14 Thread Rob Tompkins
> On Aug 14, 2018, at 10:07 AM, sebb wrote: > > No idea, please ask Infra Sounds good. -Rob > > On 14 August 2018 at 14:50, Rob Tompkins wrote: >> @Sebb with this new version of Jira, I couldn’t find your checkbox to not >> send email notifications on the bulk transition. Do you know if

Re: [all] Sebb's bulk JIRA issue transition don't send email no longer works

2018-08-14 Thread sebb
No idea, please ask Infra On 14 August 2018 at 14:50, Rob Tompkins wrote: > @Sebb with this new version of Jira, I couldn’t find your checkbox to not > send email notifications on the bulk transition. Do you know if it still > exists? > > -Rob >

[all] Sebb's bulk JIRA issue transition don't send email no longer works

2018-08-14 Thread Rob Tompkins
@Sebb with this new version of Jira, I couldn’t find your checkbox to not send email notifications on the bulk transition. Do you know if it still exists? -Rob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For

[rng] In JIRA unable to create 1.2 release for tagging issues

2018-08-14 Thread Rob Tompkins
It looks like RNG’s Jira space has a different permission profile than [LANG] in which I could create a new version if I wanted. Does anyone know what might be going on here? -Rob - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

[RNG] Skipped tests (Was: [VOTE] Release [...] 1.1 based on RC7)

2018-08-14 Thread Gilles
Hi Bruno. On Tue, 14 Aug 2018 12:17:55 + (UTC), Bruno P. Kinoshita wrote: [ X ] +0 OK, but... some issues with RAT in local project site (more below). Or a +1 if not an issue. Build passing successfully from git commit on Apache Maven 3.5.2 (138edd61fd100ec658bfa2d307c43b76940a5d7d;

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Commons RNG 1.1 based on RC7

2018-08-14 Thread Gilles
On Tue, 14 Aug 2018 07:58:46 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote: This vote passes with +1’s from the following (in order of appearance): Gilles, Gary Gregory, and Rob Tompkins. Many thanks for all of the patience with me on this RC, as it is the first multi module component to consume the

Re: [lang] preparing for 3.8

2018-08-14 Thread Gilles
On Tue, 14 Aug 2018 11:44:44 + (UTC), Bruno P. Kinoshita wrote: Hi Gilles, The parts that I think would take a bit more of time would be making sure it is thread safe The suggestion does not change anything on this issue wrt an implementation using "java.util.Observable". and to write

Re: [lang] preparing for 3.8

2018-08-14 Thread Bruno P. Kinoshita
OK for me, RERO after all Cheers Bruno From: Gary Gregory To: Commons Developers List ; Bruno P. Kinoshita Sent: Wednesday, 15 August 2018 12:15 AM Subject: Re: [lang] preparing for 3.8 Not a blocker IMO. We can release 3.8 and work on this for 3.9. Gary

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons RNG 1.1 based on RC7

2018-08-14 Thread Bruno P. Kinoshita
[ X ] +0 OK, but... some issues with RAT in local project site (more below). Or a +1 if not an issue. Build passing successfully from git commit on Apache Maven 3.5.2 (138edd61fd100ec658bfa2d307c43b76940a5d7d; 2017-10-18T20:58:13+13:00) Maven home: /opt/apache-maven-3.5.2 Java version:

Re: [lang] preparing for 3.8

2018-08-14 Thread Gary Gregory
Not a blocker IMO. We can release 3.8 and work on this for 3.9. Gary On Tue, Aug 14, 2018, 05:13 Bruno P. Kinoshita wrote: > Hi Rob! > > Thanks for RM'ing lang 3.8! > > > I think it would be good to fix for LANG-1339, as we get closer to > supporting Java 9 someday... > > I believe the summary

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Commons RNG 1.1 based on RC7

2018-08-14 Thread Rob Tompkins
This vote passes with +1’s from the following (in order of appearance): Gilles, Gary Gregory, and Rob Tompkins. Many thanks for all of the patience with me on this RC, as it is the first multi module component to consume the release-plugin. I will perform the promotions over the next day or

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons RNG 1.1 based on RC7

2018-08-14 Thread Rob Tompkins
Here’s my +1 for this RC. -Rob > On Aug 10, 2018, at 9:52 PM, Rob Tompkins wrote: > > We have added some significant enhancements since Apache Commons RNG 1.0 was > released, so I would like to release Apache Commons RNG 1.1. > > Apache Commons RNG 1.1 RC7 is available for review here: >

Re: [lang] preparing for 3.8

2018-08-14 Thread Bruno P. Kinoshita
Hi Gilles, The parts that I think would take a bit more of time would be making sure it is thread safe and to write the unit tests, send a pull request, and get some reviews to make sure it doesn't have any design flaws that would require deprecating these classes yet again. Bruno

Re: [VOTE] Release Compress 1.18 based on RC1

2018-08-14 Thread Bruno P. Kinoshita
[ X ] +1 Release these artifacts Building fine on Apache Maven 3.5.2 (138edd61fd100ec658bfa2d307c43b76940a5d7d; 2017-10-18T20:58:13+13:00) Maven home: /opt/apache-maven-3.5.2 Java version: 1.8.0_181, vendor: Oracle Corporation Java home: /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/jre Default locale:

Re: [lang] preparing for 3.8

2018-08-14 Thread Gilles
Hi. On Tue, 14 Aug 2018 11:13:48 + (UTC), Bruno P. Kinoshita wrote: Hi Rob! Thanks for RM'ing lang 3.8! I think it would be good to fix for LANG-1339, as we get closer to supporting Java 9 someday... I believe the summary from the last comments in the discussion in the mailing list is

Re: [VOTE] Release Compress 1.18 based on RC1

2018-08-14 Thread Rob Tompkins
> On Aug 14, 2018, at 12:26 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > >> On 2018-08-14, Rob Tompkins wrote: >> >> Must fix during artifact promotion: > >> (1) Signature files contain more than the correct signatures (note the >> contents below): > > This is the well known default format of GNU

Re: [lang] preparing for 3.8

2018-08-14 Thread Bruno P. Kinoshita
Hi Rob! Thanks for RM'ing lang 3.8! I think it would be good to fix for LANG-1339, as we get closer to supporting Java 9 someday... I believe the summary from the last comments in the discussion in the mailing list is that looks like Observable/Observable won't be removed from the JDK, but

Re: [imaging] IMAGING-154 remove Debug class

2018-08-14 Thread sebb
On 13 August 2018 at 20:01, Matt Sicker wrote: > As an end user of JUL in other projects, let me warn you that you'll miss a > lot of abstractions that log4j2 and slf4j provide. :) But do they matter in this context? Or is JUL (+ adapter) good enough? > On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 at 09:50, Gary

Re: [lang] preparing for 3.8

2018-08-14 Thread Pascal Schumacher
Yes, a new lang release would be great. :-) Thanks, Pascal Am 14.08.2018 um 03:31 schrieb Gary Gregory: Go for it! :-) Gary On Mon, Aug 13, 2018, 18:36 Rob Tompkins wrote: Hello all, I’m planning on working on 3.8 for lang later this week. Does anyone want to get any specific jira's in?