I am canceling this VOTE. Need to re-roll another release candidate to fix the
file signatures, following the new requirements. Will roll a new RC this week.
Thanks
Bruno
From: Gary Gregory
To: Commons Developers List ; Bruno P. Kinoshita
Sent: Monday,
Will cancel the vote tonight, thanks for spotting that @Gary.
@Rob, thanks a lot for all the great work on the new plugin. I might be able to
roll a new RC tonight, or during this week. Would you have a pointer to the
some page with the commands I have to run to properly use the plugin and
Building from tag works fine with `mvn clean test site` on
Apache Maven 3.5.2 (138edd61fd100ec658bfa2d307c43b76940a5d7d;
2017-10-18T20:58:13+13:00)
Maven home: /opt/apache-maven-3.5.2
Java version: 1.8.0_172, vendor: Oracle Corporation
Java home: /opt/jdk1.8.0_172/jre
Default locale: en_NZ,
Just post a message here.
Gary
On Sun, Oct 28, 2018, 15:07 Aleksander Ściborek <
aleksanderscibo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, so if I want to suggest that common-io should be bumped who I should
> contant with?
>
>
> On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 at 19:07, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > We are all
That mail was enough, all People with time on their Hands read the dev list.
Gruss
Bernd
--
http://bernd.eckenfels.net
Von: Aleksander Ściborek
Gesendet: Sonntag, 28. Oktober 2018 22:07
An: Commons Developers List
Betreff: Re: commons-io Java version
Hi, so if I want to suggest that common-io
Hi, so if I want to suggest that common-io should be bumped who I should
contant with?
On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 at 19:07, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are all volunteers here, so it's up to a PMC member to step up and
> volunteer.
>
> Gary
>
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 11:01 AM Aleksander
Hi All:
It would be nice to release parent 48 soon which includes:
org.jacoco:jacoco-maven-plugin 0.8.1 -> 0.8.2 (Java 11)
This let's us use JaCoCo on Java 11.
Gary
I updated from EasyMock 3.6 to 4.0, but now there is a different, problem,
see the same https://github.com/easymock/easymock/issues/230
Gary
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 1:57 PM Gary Gregory wrote:
> Feel free to comment here: https://github.com/easymock/easymock/issues/230
>
> On Fri, Oct 26,
Perhaps a path forward would be:
1) Release 2.6.1 now as is.
2) Update to Java 8 for 2.7.
I am OK with jumping to 2) over 1)
That would be up to the RM volunteering for this ;-)
Gary
On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 7:36 AM Gary Gregory wrote:
> +1 for Java 8.
>
> Gary
>
> On Sun, Oct 28, 2018, 06:13
May at least one more PMC member review this release candidate please?
Gary
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 8:10 PM Rob Tompkins wrote:
> We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements
> since Apache Commons Configuration 2.3 was released, so I would like to
> release Apache
I am canceling this VOTE. It is stale and I've not taken the time to look
into the tagging issue. Furthermore, there are additional fixes that have
just come in.
Gary
On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 7:39 AM Gary Gregory wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 1:14 PM Benedikt Ritter
> wrote:
>
>> Hi
This is mildly on me for not updating the release docs recently. I’ll put that
on my docket for the week.
PS. @Bruno solid work and many thanks for rolling the RC.
Cheers,
-Rob
> On Oct 28, 2018, at 9:35 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Hello Bruno,
>
> Thank you for preparing the RC.
>
> MD5
+1 for Java 8.
Gary
On Sun, Oct 28, 2018, 06:13 Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
> +1 to move to java 8, java 7 is more than outdated today even for legacy
> systems
>
> Le dim. 28 oct. 2018 12:10, Mark Struberg a
> écrit :
>
> > Hi folks!
> > I've worked through the open POOL tickets and found a
Hello Bruno,
Thank you for preparing the RC.
MD5 and SHA1 are no longer acceptable per Apache for our dist server.
Please use SHA256 or SHA512. Our Commons release plugin will create those
for you. Nexus has different requirements and that is fine for now.
Gary
On Sun, Oct 28, 2018, 04:58
+1 to move to java 8, java 7 is more than outdated today even for legacy
systems
Le dim. 28 oct. 2018 12:10, Mark Struberg a
écrit :
> Hi folks!
> I've worked through the open POOL tickets and found a few tickets which
> would like to enhance a few of our interfaces.
> E.g. in POOL-355 we have
Hi folks!
I've worked through the open POOL tickets and found a few tickets which would
like to enhance a few of our interfaces.
E.g. in POOL-355 we have a request to add a new method getMaxNumActive() to the
ObjectPool interface.
Now this would of course be a backward compatibility breaking
We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements since
Sanselan 0.97-incubator was released,
so I would like to release Apache Commons Imaging 1.0-alpha1.
This will be the first release after the project was renamed from Sanselan to
Apache Commons Imaging. This is an alpha
Thanks Gary. Had a bit of spare time today, so tried preparing a new release as
alpha1.
Still have a few questions from last e-mail pending, but will call the vote
anyway and just re-roll a rc2 later if necessary.
>- RELEASE-NOTES.txt is still saying 1.0... should it be 1.0-alpha?
>- What
As the author of the blog and term VALJO, here are some comments on Fraction:
You should use `of()` (overloading allowed) when the factory normally succeeds.
You should use `from` (overloading allowed) when the factory methods
are performing a conversion and have a reasonable chance of failure.
GitHub user graben opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/commons-pool/pull/16
POOL-355: Add maxNumActive flag to pool implementations
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/graben/commons-pool POOL-355
20 matches
Mail list logo
