So is the idea to provide wrappers on Sets or a Set implementation?
Gary
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 3:54 PM Stian Soiland-Reyes
wrote:
> I certainly got thinking about streams for those methods using the ancy
> integrators yes. Commons Collection is already on JDK8, so if that is
> sufficient, go
I've published the report. Thank you all for your feedback.
Gary
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 3:54 PM Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 3:49 PM sebb wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 at 20:26, Gary Gregory
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 3:15 PM sebb wrote:
>> >
>> > > On
We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements since
Apache Commons Parent 48 was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons
Parent 49.
Apache Commons Parent 49 RC2 is available for review here:
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 11:06 AM Claude Warren wrote:
> First it is important to remember that Bloom filters tell you where things
> are NOT. Second it is important to understand that Bloom filters can give
> false positives but never false negatives. Seems kind of pointless I know
> but
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 3:49 PM sebb wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 at 20:26, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 3:15 PM sebb wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 at 19:42, Gary Gregory
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi All:
> > > > Here is the draft for the board report. Any
I certainly got thinking about streams for those methods using the ancy
integrators yes. Commons Collection is already on JDK8, so if that is
sufficient, go for it!
We would need to do IP clearance to bring in the code formally to ASF. It
should be easy if it is just you who made it under Apache
On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 at 20:26, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 3:15 PM sebb wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 at 19:42, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi All:
> > > Here is the draft for the board report. Any feedback welcome:
> > > --
> > > ## Description:
> > > The mission of
I don't think I'm a committer, though I've used the commit bit.
On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 at 14:26, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 3:15 PM sebb wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 at 19:42, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi All:
> > > Here is the draft for the board report. Any
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 3:15 PM sebb wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 at 19:42, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >
> > Hi All:
> > Here is the draft for the board report. Any feedback welcome:
> > --
> > ## Description:
> > The mission of Apache Commons is the creation and maintenance of Java
> > focused
> >
Yeah, I was kind of expecting the committer-to-PMC ratio to be
infinity or close to it.
On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 at 14:15, sebb wrote:
>
> On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 at 19:42, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >
> > Hi All:
> > Here is the draft for the board report. Any feedback welcome:
> > --
> > ## Description:
>
On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 at 19:42, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Hi All:
> Here is the draft for the board report. Any feedback welcome:
> --
> ## Description:
> The mission of Apache Commons is the creation and maintenance of Java
> focused
> reusable libraries and components
>
> ## Issues:
> There are no
That looks like the highest committer to PMC ratio I've seen so far,
but I haven't paid that close attention yet. What a massive list of
committers!
On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 at 13:42, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Hi All:
> Here is the draft for the board report. Any feedback welcome:
> --
> ##
Hi All:
Here is the draft for the board report. Any feedback welcome:
--
## Description:
The mission of Apache Commons is the creation and maintenance of Java
focused
reusable libraries and components
## Issues:
There are no issues requiring board attention.
## Membership Data:
Apache Commons
@stain. You have correctly identified the code in my repository. The code
could be refactored to use streams or we could bring the jena iterator
extensions into commons. I had suggested that at one time but there were
concerns about conflicts with existing code. Duplication with of
On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 18:12:24 +0200, Gilles Sadowski
wrote:
> > The long and short of this is that there is no good unencumbered open
> > source library available at the current time. Myself and several others,
> > in conversation here at ApacheCon, have expressed interest in creating such
> > a
Hi All,
If all goes well with PR 34 [1] for CONFIGURATION-756 [2] (I don't see a
problem there but I wrote it ;-) I plan on merging it and cutting an RC
ASAP. Feel free to review.
[1] https://github.com/apache/commons-configuration/pull/34
[2]
Hi.
Le mer. 11 sept. 2019 à 17:06, Claude Warren a écrit :
>
> [...]
>
> The long and short of this is that there is no good unencumbered open
> source library available at the current time. Myself and several others,
> in conversation here at ApacheCon, have expressed interest in creating such
As another note, we have had discussions here at ApacheCon about developing
a method to exchange bloom filter hashing algorithms to make it easier for
systems to publish interfaces where bloom filters are passed as the search
parameters.
Also, bloom filters are good for looking for "and"ed
First it is important to remember that Bloom filters tell you where things
are NOT. Second it is important to understand that Bloom filters can give
false positives but never false negatives. Seems kind of pointless I know
but consider the case where you have 10K buckets that may contain the
Im cancelling this vote and will re-build later today.
-Rob
> On Sep 11, 2019, at 7:45 AM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 at 14:40, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 7:10 AM Alex Herbert
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>>
>>> Tested using:
>>>
>>> mvn -V
>>> Apache Maven
> On Sep 11, 2019, at 7:45 AM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 at 14:40, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 7:10 AM Alex Herbert
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>>
>>> Tested using:
>>>
>>> mvn -V
>>> Apache Maven 3.6.0 (97c98ec64a1fdfee7767ce5ffb20918da4f719f3;
>>>
On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 at 12:36, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> I would like to know more. I am curious since looking up whether an element
> is in a set is done via a hash code. How do you do better than that?
Wikipedia has a good explanation:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloom_filter
Basically
On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 at 14:40, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 7:10 AM Alex Herbert
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> >
> > Tested using:
> >
> > mvn -V
> > Apache Maven 3.6.0 (97c98ec64a1fdfee7767ce5ffb20918da4f719f3;
> > 2018-10-24T19:41:47+01:00)
> > Maven home:
On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 at 15:15, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 10:12 AM Gilles Sadowski
> wrote:
>
> > Hello.
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Le mer. 11 sept. 2019 à 15:54, Gary Gregory a
> > écrit :
> > >
> > > Hi All:
> > >
> > > I only hope that this will not turn into a bike shedding
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 10:12 AM Gilles Sadowski
wrote:
> Hello.
>
> +1
>
> Le mer. 11 sept. 2019 à 15:54, Gary Gregory a
> écrit :
> >
> > Hi All:
> >
> > I only hope that this will not turn into a bike shedding thread...
>
> A uniform coding style (for all components); that *seems* obvious
Hello.
+1
Le mer. 11 sept. 2019 à 15:54, Gary Gregory a écrit :
>
> Hi All:
>
> I only hope that this will not turn into a bike shedding thread...
A uniform coding style (for all components); that *seems* obvious (too)...
Gilles
>
> Commons Configuration is one of the few components we have
Hi All:
I only hope that this will not turn into a bike shedding thread...
Commons Configuration is one of the few components we have that uses the
formatting rule (enforced by Checkstyle) where braces must be on separate
lines. In the age of lambdas, this is, IMO, lame (a technical term ;-) for
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 7:10 AM Alex Herbert
wrote:
> +1
>
>
> Tested using:
>
> mvn -V
> Apache Maven 3.6.0 (97c98ec64a1fdfee7767ce5ffb20918da4f719f3;
> 2018-10-24T19:41:47+01:00)
> Maven home: /usr/local/apache-maven-3.6.0
> Java version: 1.8.0_222, vendor: Private Build, runtime:
>
I would like to know more. I am curious since looking up whether an element
is in a set is done via a hash code. How do you do better than that?
Gary
On Tue, Sep 10, 2019, 16:51 Bruno P. Kinoshita wrote:
> +1 Collections sounds like a good place for a bloom filter.
>
> Bruno
>
> On
+1
Tested using:
mvn -V
Apache Maven 3.6.0 (97c98ec64a1fdfee7767ce5ffb20918da4f719f3;
2018-10-24T19:41:47+01:00)
Maven home: /usr/local/apache-maven-3.6.0
Java version: 1.8.0_222, vendor: Private Build, runtime:
/usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/jre
Default locale: en_GB, platform
30 matches
Mail list logo
