[VOTE] Release Apache Commons Configuration 2.6 based on RC1

We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache Commons Configuration 2.5 was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons Configuration 2.6. Apache Commons Configuration 2.6 RC1 is available for review here:

Re: [RNG] Duplicated blocks?

>>> [...] > > Could you check that you can declare issues as "solved”? > > I can sign in with GitHub and it links my Apache credentials. This allows me > to comment on issues and ‘confirm’ them which I could not do when not logged > in. > > However I do not see options to mark false positives

Re: [RNG] Duplicated blocks?

> On 13 Sep 2019, at 22:10, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Hi. > > Le ven. 13 sept. 2019 à 22:34, Alex Herbert > a écrit : >> >> >> >>> On 13 Sep 2019, at 15:27, Gilles Sadowski wrote: >>> >>> Hello. >>> >>> SonarQube reports "duplicated blocks": >>> >>>

Re: [RNG] Duplicated blocks?

Hi. Le ven. 13 sept. 2019 à 22:34, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > > > On 13 Sep 2019, at 15:27, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > > Hello. > > > > SonarQube reports "duplicated blocks": > > > > https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=commons-rng=duplicated_blocks=list > > > > Does it report

Re: [RNG] Duplicated blocks?

> On 13 Sep 2019, at 15:27, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Hello. > > SonarQube reports "duplicated blocks": > > https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=commons-rng=duplicated_blocks=list > > Does it report about the license header? No. If you click though to the source code (from a

[RNG] Duplicated blocks?

Hello. SonarQube reports "duplicated blocks": https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=commons-rng=duplicated_blocks=list Does it report about the license header? If so, how to deactivate that spurious report? Regards, Gilles

RE: [CONFIGURATION] Formatting braces

That's exactly what we do with all our projects here at UW/PLSE. Mark -Original Message- From: James Ring [mailto:s...@jdns.org] Sent: Friday, September 13, 2019 6:44 AM To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [CONFIGURATION] Formatting braces What about

Re: [CONFIGURATION] Formatting braces

What about https://github.com/google/google-java-format ? Just require that it be run on check-in, all these style questions go away (as a bonus, it looks nice too). On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 6:54 AM Gary Gregory wrote: > > Hi All: > > I only hope that this will not turn into a bike shedding

Re: [CONFIGURATION] Formatting braces

On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 1:11 PM Thomas Vandahl wrote: > On 11.09.19 15:53, Gary Gregory wrote: > > public static final ConfigurationConsumer > > DEFAULT_INCLUDE_LISTENER = e -> { throw e; }; > > > > public static final ConfigurationConsumer > > NOOP_INCLUDE_LISTENER = e -> { /* noop */

Re: New Sub-project Proposal.

> > [...] > > Gilles, > > Take a look at the PR, I added comments to allow the PR to have 0 deps. > > Gary > > IMO, the package should be named "bloomfilter" (without "s"). Naming seems inconsistent in [Collections]: Some (package) names are singular, other plural. * Indent must be 4 spaces. *

Re: New Sub-project Proposal.

Hi. > > [...] > > > > Gilles, > > Take a look at the PR, I added comments to allow the PR to have 0 deps. How about creating a branch on the Apache repository, so that we can commit examples of what needs to be modified in order to comply with the project's style and requirements? Gilles