Re: [rng] Documenting JumpableUniformRandomProvider

2019-09-20 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hello. 2019-09-20 18:45 UTC+02:00, Alex Herbert : > I have added some new sections to the user guide for new additions to > the library. > > Currently the section on JumpableUniformRandomProvider gives an example: > > RandomSource source = RandomSource.XO_RO_SHI_RO_128_SS; // Known to be >

[VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL 6.4.0 based on RC2

2019-09-20 Thread Gary Gregory
We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache Commons BCEL 6.3.1 was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons BCEL 6.4.0. Apache Commons BCEL 6.4.0 RC2 is available for review here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/bcel/6.4.0-RC2 (svn

[rng] Documenting JumpableUniformRandomProvider

2019-09-20 Thread Alex Herbert
I have added some new sections to the user guide for new additions to the library. Currently the section on JumpableUniformRandomProvider gives an example: RandomSource source = RandomSource.XO_RO_SHI_RO_128_SS; // Known to be jumpable. JumpableUniformRandomProvider master =

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Commons IO 2.6 based on RC3

2019-09-20 Thread Gary Gregory
So is it safe to add a rel/ tag for the same commit as 2.6 RC3? Will you do that or shall I? Gary On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 8:37 AM sebb wrote: > On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 at 13:30, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > > Based on the "I’ll publish the release tomorrow." below it looks like he > > did publish it

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Commons IO 2.6 based on RC3

2019-09-20 Thread sebb
On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 at 13:30, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Based on the "I’ll publish the release tomorrow." below it looks like he > did publish it since it is in the maven repo, on dist, and the site is up, > but seems to have not completed all the steps. > I could not find an announce email for 2.5

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Commons IO 2.6 based on RC3

2019-09-20 Thread Gary Gregory
Based on the "I’ll publish the release tomorrow." below it looks like he did publish it since it is in the maven repo, on dist, and the site is up, but seems to have not completed all the steps. I could not find an announce email for 2.5 either, could you? Gary On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 7:38 AM

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Commons IO 2.6 based on RC3

2019-09-20 Thread sebb
It looks like this was not completed: could not find an announce email, and the tag has not been created (see recent user@ email) On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 at 19:26, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > > Hello, > > > Am 15.10.2017 um 12:22 schrieb Benedikt Ritter : > > > > Hello, > > > > we have fixed quite a

Re: [Collections] Bring Abstract* tests into it's own test jar

2019-09-20 Thread Claude Warren
If you are looking for tests for interfaces take a look at contract testing (https://github.com/Claudenw/junit-contracts) On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 9:40 AM Rohan Suri wrote: > Apologies I wasn't aware the test jars are being released as well. > Adding "classifier: tests" when specifying the

[Collections] Bring Abstract* tests into it's own test jar

2019-09-20 Thread Rohan Suri
Hi, The Abstract* tests for collections seem pretty useful to be in a separate jar so that they could be reused by anyone wanting to test a new map implementation. If the idea seems fine, I'd be happy to take up the task and discuss the required changes in pom, etc. Rohan.

Re: [Collections] Bring Abstract* tests into it's own test jar

2019-09-20 Thread Rohan Suri
Apologies I wasn't aware the test jars are being released as well. Adding "classifier: tests" when specifying the dependency does the job. On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 1:05 AM Rohan Suri wrote: > Hi, > > The Abstract* tests for collections seem pretty useful to be in a separate > jar so that they