I plan on cutting a release candidate this week but I do not see this PR as
a blocker, just a nice-to-have if appropriate.
I encourage all to review PRs and Jiras.
I like RERO so if you guys can only help later, that's fine as well.
Gary
On Tue, Mar 2, 2021, 13:46 Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
>
Hello,
I do agree that we don’t need to worry about removing synchronized for the
purpose of beeing compatible with early versions of Loom (at least not for all
commons projects). This is especially true if the code gets more ugly, might
have subtle behavior changes or similar.
However I
I want to move the discussion from the PR to this mailing list,
https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/154
TY,
Gary
