Re: [net] Build broken by commit "Prevent serialization"

2021-12-31 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hello. Le sam. 1 janv. 2022 à 03:04, Gary Gregory a écrit : > > Hi All & Sebb, > > Git bisect tells me the commit below broke the build and it's been broken > ever since. Please run a local build before you commit. > > 991b775f2052e150c4c16d1c1cd2073021d40c2e is the first bad commit > commit

[net] Build broken by commit "Prevent serialization"

2021-12-31 Thread Gary Gregory
Hi All & Sebb, Git bisect tells me the commit below broke the build and it's been broken ever since. Please run a local build before you commit. 991b775f2052e150c4c16d1c1cd2073021d40c2e is the first bad commit commit 991b775f2052e150c4c16d1c1cd2073021d40c2e Author: Sebb Date: Wed Dec 15

Re: [IMPORTANT] - ci.apache.org and CMS Shutdown end of January 2022

2021-12-31 Thread Gary Gregory
On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 8:22 PM Gilles Sadowski wrote: > Le ven. 31 déc. 2021 à 14:17, Gary Gregory a > écrit : > > > > WRT Commons, CI is handled by GitHub actions > > Whatever "handled" means here, is the sentence true for > *all* components? > > I thought that "GH actions" was replacing

Re: [IMPORTANT] - ci.apache.org and CMS Shutdown end of January 2022

2021-12-31 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Le ven. 31 déc. 2021 à 14:17, Gary Gregory a écrit : > > WRT Commons, CI is handled by GitHub actions Whatever "handled" means here, is the sentence true for *all* components? I thought that "GH actions" was replacing Travis (for some components). > these days so I am not worried > about

Re: [commons-vfs] Failure in bump ftpserver-core from 1.1.1 to 1.1.2

2021-12-31 Thread Xeno Amess
ftpserver updated. pr at https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/235 details/investigations at https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/231 Xeno Amess 于2022年1月1日周六 02:12写道: > migrating sshd to 2.8.0 now. > > Gary Gregory 于2022年1月1日周六 02:04写道: > >> Hi Xeno, >> >> Correct, I don't care

Re: [commons-vfs] Failure in bump ftpserver-core from 1.1.1 to 1.1.2

2021-12-31 Thread Xeno Amess
migrating sshd to 2.8.0 now. Gary Gregory 于2022年1月1日周六 02:04写道: > Hi Xeno, > > Correct, I don't care about slf4j in this thread. Thank you for helping out > :-) > > Gary > > > On Fri, Dec 31, 2021, 12:52 Xeno Amess wrote: > > > > Help also needed for

Re: [commons-vfs] Failure in bump ftpserver-core from 1.1.1 to 1.1.2

2021-12-31 Thread Gary Gregory
Hi Xeno, Correct, I don't care about slf4j in this thread. Thank you for helping out :-) Gary On Fri, Dec 31, 2021, 12:52 Xeno Amess wrote: > > Help also needed for https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/225 > > I thought you wanna talk about all dependabot failures in vfs in the same >

Re: [commons-vfs] Failure in bump ftpserver-core from 1.1.1 to 1.1.2

2021-12-31 Thread Xeno Amess
> Help also needed for https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/225 I thought you wanna talk about all dependabot failures in vfs in the same thread. So this email thread is only focused on sshd and ftpserver? Gary Gregory 于2022年1月1日周六 01:47写道: > On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 12:16 PM Xeno Amess

Re: [commons-vfs] Failure in bump ftpserver-core from 1.1.1 to 1.1.2

2021-12-31 Thread Gary Gregory
On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 12:16 PM Xeno Amess wrote: > @Gary Gregory > well at least you can have this from me > https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/233 > seems it can work, but don't merge until all cis are done. > Let's keep this email thread focused please. Gary > > Rob Spoor

Re: [commons-vfs] Failure in bump ftpserver-core from 1.1.1 to 1.1.2

2021-12-31 Thread Gary Gregory
On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 11:50 AM Xeno Amess wrote: > @Gary Gregory > Alright I woke up. > Hard to fall asleep when thinking my ex-fiancée should be happing with her > new boyfriend... > (sigh.) > I will help you upgrade slf4j first, as I think it should be easier. then > one by one.. > What

Re: [commons-vfs] Failure in bump ftpserver-core from 1.1.1 to 1.1.2

2021-12-31 Thread Xeno Amess
@Rob Spoor I will have a try to upgrade it directly to 2.8.0 good luck to me... Xeno Amess 于2022年1月1日周六 01:15写道: > @Gary Gregory > well at least you can have this from me > https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/233 > seems it can work, but don't merge until all cis are done. > > Rob Spoor

Re: [commons-vfs] Failure in bump ftpserver-core from 1.1.1 to 1.1.2

2021-12-31 Thread Xeno Amess
@Gary Gregory well at least you can have this from me https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/233 seems it can work, but don't merge until all cis are done. Rob Spoor 于2022年1月1日周六 01:10写道: > A quick check shows that some more dependencies are needed, for code > split off from sshd-core. I

Re: [commons-vfs] Failure in bump ftpserver-core from 1.1.1 to 1.1.2

2021-12-31 Thread Rob Spoor
A quick check shows that some more dependencies are needed, for code split off from sshd-core. I found some: * https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.sshd/sshd-sftp * https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.sshd/sshd-scp However, even after adding these two I was still missing

Re: [commons-vfs] Failure in bump ftpserver-core from 1.1.1 to 1.1.2

2021-12-31 Thread John Patrick
oh, didn't thinking about that resource depletion. probably a useful feature that github actions should thinking about adding; - if pro account allow - if account previously approved for project allow i added '.tmp', then committed, then removed '.tmp', then committed, the pushed to my fork, so

Re: [commons-vfs] Failure in bump ftpserver-core from 1.1.1 to 1.1.2

2021-12-31 Thread Xeno Amess
@Gary Gregory Alright I woke up. Hard to fall asleep when thinking my ex-fiancée should be happing with her new boyfriend... (sigh.) I will help you upgrade slf4j first, as I think it should be easier. then one by one.. Xeno Amess 于2022年1月1日周六 00:43写道: > btw, I didn't get what you changed

Re: [commons-vfs] Failure in bump ftpserver-core from 1.1.1 to 1.1.2

2021-12-31 Thread Xeno Amess
btw, I didn't get what you changed comparing to the original pr... If a re-trigger can work, then it is quite amazing, as several actions all died but they all die because of just false failed build? Not very likely IMO... Xeno Amess 于2022年1月1日周六 00:42写道: > > any reason pr's have to be manually

Re: [commons-vfs] Failure in bump ftpserver-core from 1.1.1 to 1.1.2

2021-12-31 Thread Xeno Amess
> any reason pr's have to be manually approved before the ci jobs execute? 2 reasons. 1. github actions is free but only under some rate liminition. So if there is no such rule, some bad guys can create 100 accounts and drain every open-source repo's github actions account. 2. some repos

Re: [commons-vfs] Failure in bump ftpserver-core from 1.1.1 to 1.1.2

2021-12-31 Thread Gary Gregory
On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 11:27 AM John Patrick wrote: > so wanted to try and help out but unable to as pr won't build until it's > approved by maintainer. > from what i can tell it should have worked. tried that branch and master > and both pass locally > What is your config? 'mvn -version'?

Re: [commons-vfs] Failure in bump ftpserver-core from 1.1.1 to 1.1.2

2021-12-31 Thread Gary Gregory
Help also needed for https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/225 :-) Gary On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 8:28 AM Gary Gregory wrote: > Does anyone have any free time to look at this failure? > > I'm still dealing with Log4j fallout... > > Gary > > -- Forwarded message - > From:

Re: [commons-vfs] Failure in bump ftpserver-core from 1.1.1 to 1.1.2

2021-12-31 Thread John Patrick
so wanted to try and help out but unable to as pr won't build until it's approved by maintainer. from what i can tell it should have worked. tried that branch and master and both pass locally tried to kick off another build to see if just false failed build, so created new branch but it linked to

Re: [commons-vfs] Failure in bump ftpserver-core from 1.1.1 to 1.1.2

2021-12-31 Thread Xeno Amess
need sleep now,will have a look 10 hours later XenoAmess From: Gary Gregory Sent: Friday, December 31, 2021 9:28:36 PM To: Commons Developers List Subject: [commons-vfs] Failure in bump ftpserver-core from 1.1.1 to 1.1.2 Does anyone have any free time to look

[commons-vfs] Failure in bump ftpserver-core from 1.1.1 to 1.1.2

2021-12-31 Thread Gary Gregory
Does anyone have any free time to look at this failure? I'm still dealing with Log4j fallout... Gary -- Forwarded message - From: GitBox Date: Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 6:05 AM Subject: [GitHub] [commons-vfs] dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request #231: Bump ftpserver-core from

Re: [IMPORTANT] - ci.apache.org and CMS Shutdown end of January 2022

2021-12-31 Thread Gary Gregory
WRT Commons, CI is handled by GitHub actions these days so I am not worried about losing ci.a.o. TY Gary On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 6:38 AM Gavin McDonald wrote: > Hi All, > > (This email is BCC many (19) lists, please reply to bui...@apache.org > only) > > Infra has set a FINAL date of January

Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.1 based on RC1

2021-12-31 Thread Gary Gregory
On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 4:25 AM Thomas Vandahl wrote: > > Am 23.12.2021 um 19:20 schrieb Thomas Vandahl : > > > > Hi folks, > > > > We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements > since Apache Commons JCS 3.0 was released, so I would like to release > Apache Commons JCS

[IMPORTANT] - ci.apache.org and CMS Shutdown end of January 2022

2021-12-31 Thread Gavin McDonald
Hi All, (This email is BCC many (19) lists, please reply to bui...@apache.org only) Infra has set a FINAL date of January 31st 2022 for the turn off of ci.apache.org. This includes all of its nodes , of which the CMS node is one. Therefore the CMS is also going to be gone on the 31st January

[CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.1 based on RC1

2021-12-31 Thread Thomas Vandahl
> Am 23.12.2021 um 19:20 schrieb Thomas Vandahl : > > Hi folks, > > We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements since > Apache Commons JCS 3.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache > Commons JCS 3.1. Thanks to Bruno we were able to find an issue that could